Company car insurance & young drivers
Company car insurance & young drivers
Author
Discussion

fwaggie

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

224 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
I've just been reading another thread that mentioned the "fronting" insurance fraud.

And this thought popped into my mind.

If Dad sets up a limited company (one off charge of £80, annual charges of £0 if you're good with numbers, or maybe £150 for an accountant once a year).

Then employed the son/daughter to work for that company.

And provided them with a company car.

So the son/daughter would obviously be covered by the company car insurance.

Pay them the equivalent amount to what the benefits in kind to be paid on the car are.

A company doesn't *have* to do anything, so long as it's records and returns are done correctly and upto date.

And so long as the CC tax is correctly worked out on the private miles done "outside" business hours is done correctly, that should be fine too?


So, would doing that work out cheaper than the son/daughter having to sell their internal organs to pay for their own private insurance? With a family of one child? And the more kids in the family that are driving, the cheaper it'd get. Is there an age limit normally set by CC insurers?

I suppose mum and dad can sell their cars to the company too, and also be in the CC insurance scheme.


So, is this viable? Or is company car insurance just as expensive?

Golaboots

369 posts

172 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
Legal? Not sure.
Moral? Defiantly not
Worth it? No

marshalla

15,902 posts

225 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
How is the company generating income to cover its debts, or what assets are available to cover its debts ?

If the answers are "it has no income" and "none" respectively, then it is an insolvent company and trading illegally.

Greengecko

594 posts

171 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
The cost to a company of owning a car are pretty steep if you look into it. I guess this could be done, however the insurers would want to know what sort of 'business' use the cars were being used for, and well there is no business.

Overall this would end up probably costing the same if not more than the normal route.

Greengecko

594 posts

171 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
marshalla said:
How is the company generating income to cover its debts, or what assets are available to cover its debts ?

If the answers are "it has no income" and "none" respectively, then it is an insolvent company and trading illegally.
The company would have no debts, effectively dormant. It cannot be insolvent if it isn't trading in the first place..

marshalla

15,902 posts

225 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
Greengecko said:
The company would have no debts, effectively dormant. It cannot be insolvent if it isn't trading in the first place..
It has to cover employee salary and company car insurance, according to the OP's "cunning plan".

jamoor

14,506 posts

239 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
Fleet insurance policies sometimes have age restrictions too.

fwaggie

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

224 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
marshalla said:
Greengecko said:
The company would have no debts, effectively dormant. It cannot be insolvent if it isn't trading in the first place..
It has to cover employee salary and company car insurance, according to the OP's "cunning plan".
I can think of umpteen ways to do that very easily.

Gardening services. (husband does the gardening for his family and gets "paid"), Property Maintenance, Financial Advice, etc, etc.

Any intangible thing would do. Anything already being done that can be done by an outside company would do.


I've never heard of anyone doing it, and I bet someone else has thought of it before now, so I'm wondering where the problem is.

My guess is that the cost of the CC insurance is prohibitive when compared to even a new drivers private insurance, but I'm curious, hence asking.

(if you're wondering, I'm single and no kids, this is purely a hypothetical scenario)

bencollins4

1,226 posts

230 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
Most fleet insurance policies I deal with want to know about anyone under 25 and will probably impose either an additional premium for them or a huge excess.

Insurers are getting pretty wise to these sort of games these days so probably not worth the hassle!

fwaggie

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

224 months

Monday 4th June 2012
quotequote all
Greengecko said:
The cost to a company of owning a car are pretty steep if you look into it. I guess this could be done, however the insurers would want to know what sort of 'business' use the cars were being used for, and well there is no business.

Overall this would end up probably costing the same if not more than the normal route.
I'm just about to get a new car on a personal 3 year PCP.

I notice that the business deals are about 2/3rds the price of private deals (IIRC they're not called PCP as the P is personal or private, but still 3 year deal), which is a lot more than 20% VAT.

I know that having a company car is expensive, when it's used purely for company business, and if it's used for private use as well, the cost goes up a lot IIRC.

But seeing some of these ludicrous quotes for new drivers has me wondering if doing it this way would work our cheaper for the first year (or two, or three).