Most Incorrect Use of the Word "Stunning" in an Advert?
Most Incorrect Use of the Word "Stunning" in an Advert?
Author
Discussion

Fireblade69

Original Poster:

637 posts

233 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure this is anything but...

Stunning Example

Vitorio

4,296 posts

173 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Well, i for one find it stunning

Stunningly awefull that is.

HustleRussell

26,583 posts

190 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
£7.5k! For £800 worth of 406 coupe with some plastic on?

Save Ferris

2,738 posts

243 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
I also reckon most incorrect use of the words...

"100% accurate outside"

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

243 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
100% accurate outside. Of course it is.

Le Mans Visitor

1,119 posts

232 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Nice panel gaps, not.

I reckon you could fit a 406 through some of them, infact, I woudnt be suprrised if the 406 itself if trying to escape.


Shocking

mercfunder

8,535 posts

203 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Nope, I reckon he is spot on.....


stun·ning (stnng)
adj.
1. Causing or capable of causing emotional shock or loss of consciousness.

GadgeS3C

4,727 posts

194 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
One word - why?

paranoid airbag

2,679 posts

189 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
aaaand there goes breakfast.

larrylamb11

693 posts

281 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
I dunno, I'm stunned..... Probably not in the way the vendor was hoping though.

Viper_Larry

4,377 posts

286 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Awful car, but at least he has written the ad in readable English, unlike most we tend to see!

Tuvra

7,926 posts

255 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Some examples of these are pretty good and would fool most, such as:

The black one originally posted though? Would ANYONE look at that and think "mmmmm nice Ferrari"? So much fail...

kambites

71,573 posts

251 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
mercfunder said:
Nope, I reckon he is spot on.....

stun·ning (stnng)
adj.
1. Causing or capable of causing emotional shock or loss of consciousness.
hehe That's what I was thinking.

Altrezia

8,742 posts

241 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
I really don't understand these replicas. The real thing isn't that much more cash really.. and why would you rather have a fake, less fast, less pretty, less special 'thing' than even a regular car like an Elise or whatever else is in the price range?

Odd people.

heretheygo

1,117 posts

235 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
..... shall I do one wiper blade or two?...... hmmmm, nah fkit - 3!

krisdelta

4,673 posts

231 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Save Ferris said:
I also reckon most incorrect use of the words...

"100% accurate outside"
It looks about as much like a Ferarri as my Mum's fiesta! Comedy gold smile

Dog Star

17,627 posts

198 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Poor 406 Coupe frown That is fking awful.

I am loving the wheels, but my favourite bit is the passenger wiper arm :rolf:

Pixelpeep

9,050 posts

172 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Altrezia said:
I really don't understand these replicas. The real thing isn't that much more cash really.. and why would you rather have a fake, less fast, less pretty, less special 'thing' than even a regular car like an Elise or whatever else is in the price range?

Odd people.
really?

cheapest i could find > http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4122413.htm vs http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4057216.htm and a few grands worth of tat.



Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

213 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
Zoosk.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

279 months

Tuesday 7th August 2012
quotequote all
sparks_E39 said:
100% accurate outside. Of course it is.
It is 100% accurate, it's 100% accurate of a 406 made to look like a 430. yes