Ford explorer, 97-2001, any experiences???
Ford explorer, 97-2001, any experiences???
Author
Discussion

Tampon

Original Poster:

4,637 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
All this talk of american pickups had me looking at the ads again.

Being larger than the average man I have always liked big cars, and being a miser I have always liked cheap ones.

When I was looking for a car before the current vectra, I was looking at old range rovers, top spec omegas and ford explorers. I went with the Omega in the end due to the mileage they got. That isn;t really a issue any more as I don;t drive nearly as much as I did.

Now I see explorers going for around £1k ish, now apart from the 20mpg if you drives like miss daisy are there any other negatives to look out for ? I am hoping the mechanics is up there with other over engined unstressed yank trucks. Also I like to have a go a the mechanics myself, are they easy to work on ?

davepoth

29,395 posts

226 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
I rode around in one in the US in 2002, what I can tell you is that the aircon is extremely powerful. smile

David87

7,002 posts

239 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
Make sure it doesn't have Firestone tyres and don't go round corners too quickly. wink

HeatonNorris

1,649 posts

175 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
I believe the trade refer to them as 'Exploders', which probably tells you all you need to know.

Tampon

Original Poster:

4,637 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
THEY EXPLODE !!!!

Jesus christ that is a what I call Bangernomics.

I take it you are talking about head gaskets ?

MarsellusWallace

1,180 posts

228 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
20mpg?

A lad who used to work for me had one years ago and was getting more like 12-14 round town

DickHerpes

900 posts

186 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firestone_and_Ford_ti...

ETA: I'd have one just cos they were in Jurassic Park

Tampon

Original Poster:

4,637 posts

252 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
MarsellusWallace said:
20mpg?

A lad who used to work for me had one years ago and was getting more like 12-14 round town
Yesah they seem to get 14ish in town, 25 on a run, average at 20.

Geekman

2,905 posts

173 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
We had one in the family for years. During a period of around 130k, literally nothing went wrong with it apart from consumables. Was pretty quick for what it was, handling was awful but probably no worse than its competitors. My dad had much "better" cars before and since but hugely regrets selling the Explorer. It's currently on around 200k and still going strong: our friends use it as transport at their villa in Spain.
Even nowadays there are still loads of the 1997-2001 models around in the USA, which surely says something about their reliability. We also managed to get 25mpg on motorway trips, so they're not quite as uneconomical as you'd expect.

NotDave

20,951 posts

184 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
We (family) had a 99/T plate one in black from 2002 for 7 years.

Bought with 52k, traded in with 130,000+ miles on.

Mother adored it. Auto, 270 BHP iirc and a right noise. It was treated like a van, and endlessly practical.

Father loved it for towing twin axle 6.4m caravan, did it with ease.

I enjoyed driving it, handled far better than you'd expect.

Nothing broke on it ever, just got a whiny diff by the end and rattley timing chains.

Servicing was cheap/easy.

Parts had to be ordered in advance usually ... Local FMC dealer were completely useless with it, but Sheffield were good.


It would take an obscene amount of weight in it, to the point where you thought it'd never move... Like a transit tippers worth of rubble, or steel girders for house renovations.

Turn the key, suspension pumps up, away you went.

Mpg wise, my mum was heavy footed with it and saw 14-16mpg around town.

20-25mpg on a run, even with caravan.

Find a well loved, low miles LPG one & you're winning

tr7v8

7,609 posts

255 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
Timing chains are a big issue with these the front one is easy but the back one isn't. I was also concerned about the relatively low numbers that exist in the UK, this might have impacted spares. I ended up with a 2000 Grand Cherokee.

NotDave

20,951 posts

184 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
At banger omits money the timing chains are hardly an issue. Ours ran perfect, just rattled a bit on tickover.


redtwin

7,518 posts

209 months

Wednesday 22nd August 2012
quotequote all
I looked at one that rattled so bad it would put a diesel to shame. The trader tried assuring me it would only cost £80 to change, but by that point I was totally put off it.


z4chris99

12,483 posts

206 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
we're on number 3 now..

first had Firestone tyres, both rears stripped at 100mph in the desert and we flew off the motorway. nearly killed us all, If anyone was in the boot it was crushed on landing and they would be a pancake. Running back to the motorway covered In blood to hail a car to take us to the nearest hospital 25 mins away wasn't fun.

however we all survived, and part of the settlement with Ford was another car

Second car was a red Eddie Bauer, the box went twice, and a lot of problems toward its end of life

now on a 2012 one, also red.

pic; ours a few years back.



Edited by z4chris99 on Thursday 23 August 00:11

rockandrollmark

1,181 posts

250 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all

TheTurbonator

2,792 posts

178 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
DickHerpes said:
Wikipedia said:
it has been estimated that over 250 deaths and more than 3,000 serious injuries resulted from these failures
eek I'd heard of this but didn't realise just how serious it was and that so many deaths had occurred from it.

Minemapper

933 posts

183 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
We had a '95 Sport (the two door version). It was nippy enough, especially with a rare 5 speed box, but plagued with electrical problems that no one seemed able to fix. This was in 2000 in the US, main dealers were hopeless.

I wouldn't touch one now if you gave it to me.

NotDave

20,951 posts

184 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
Ours came with Firestones, a week later the dealer (FMC) put 5x brand new michellins on it.

Cruise control units were homicidal too, and ECU would set fire... Again both replaced FOC

finlo

4,453 posts

230 months

Thursday 23rd August 2012
quotequote all
tr7v8 said:
Timing chains are a big issue with these the front one is easy but the back one isn't. I was also concerned about the relatively low numbers that exist in the UK, this might have impacted spares. I ended up with a 2000 Grand Cherokee.
Are both the chains not at the front then?

I thought they used a 4.0 litre OHC version of the Cologne V6?

tr7v8

7,609 posts

255 months

Friday 24th August 2012
quotequote all
finlo said:
tr7v8 said:
Timing chains are a big issue with these the front one is easy but the back one isn't. I was also concerned about the relatively low numbers that exist in the UK, this might have impacted spares. I ended up with a 2000 Grand Cherokee.
Are both the chains not at the front then?

I thought they used a 4.0 litre OHC version of the Cologne V6?
Nope one is at the front & the other head is reversed & the chain is at the back. Sometimes apparently they can rattle for ages, others rattle then break. A guy in Newport Gwent Wales does the chains for around £700, he also seem to be "Mr Explorer" he breaks them etc. This is one of his E Bay ads 360362703394