Baby on Board=avoid
Author
Discussion

Motorrad

Original Poster:

6,811 posts

216 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
We all knew it, the type of clueless, self obsessed fkwit who'd affix one of these to their vehicle is to be avoided. Here though is the proof.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/9599881/B...

Good though in a way because it means I know to avoid the useless fkers at a glance.

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Not wishing to open a can of worms but surely the emergency services are there to try to save all lives. Would a 'baby on board' sign make any difference to the approach of the emergency services?

Honest question!

bad company

21,919 posts

295 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
If they are distracting then surely a bad idea.

Similarly I have never understood why people drive with chains & stuff dangling from the rear view mirror. eek

0000

13,874 posts

220 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Would a 'baby on board' sign make any difference to the approach of the emergency services?
If it does, they're an even worse idea if the child isn't in the car.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Not wishing to open a can of worms but surely the emergency services are there to try to save all lives. Would a 'baby on board' sign make any difference to the approach of the emergency services?

Honest question!
No.

Riknos

4,701 posts

233 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
The stickers serve as a warning to me - This driver is probably spending 50% of their time looking in the rear mirror at the kids and talking to them, and not watching the road!

Pothole

34,367 posts

311 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Slightly concerning that both the Brake and AA spokespersons are so misguided.

AFAIK, the emergency services don't treat vehicles with these signs in them any differently from any other vehicle at an incident scene, nor should they. Triage is triage, the age of the patient is irrelevant in most cases.

The figures, as rightly pointed out, are very flawed. This is a non-story.

KarlMac

4,626 posts

170 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
How is this more distracting that a small van have its rear window covered in vinyl, or an estate with a dog guard in?

Its just searching for a reason to explain the fact that for some reason most women turn into gibbering idiots after having children.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

274 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Not wishing to open a can of worms but surely the emergency services are there to try to save all lives. Would a 'baby on board' sign make any difference to the approach of the emergency services?
I know it says that in the article, but where did this stuff about alerting the emergency services come from? My Dad was a fireman and a car crashed outside our house once. One of the first things he did was a touch search (it was dark) of the rear seat area.

I always thought they were just to warn following drivers to keep their distance.


stuartmmcfc

8,775 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Not wishing to open a can of worms but surely the emergency services are there to try to save all lives. Would a 'baby on board' sign make any difference to the approach of the emergency services?

Honest question!
I was told a "baby on board sticker" alerts the emergency services that there may be a small baby either hidden from view by wreckage or flung from the car and, once again, not immediately obvious.
I was also told that time has been wasted hunting for a baby, due to the warning sign, when the baby wasn't actually present.

stuartmmcfc

8,775 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Reading thew article it seems people will find anything to blame for an accident rather than their own poor driving standards.

Pothole

34,367 posts

311 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Careful, mate. Reading the article???!!! What sort of a pervert are you?!?!?

stuartmmcfc

8,775 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Careful, mate. Reading the article???!!! What sort of a pervert are you?!?!?
hehe
i did have to think about if i was bothered enough to click on the link though laugh

jmorgan

36,010 posts

313 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Meanwhile, another survey poll said doing surveys caused random brain haemorrhaging whilst driving and will one day blow the world up.

Gogoplata

1,272 posts

189 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
"Although it is said they can alert emergency services to the presence of a child, their original purpose was to encourage other motorists to drive carefully in the presence of a car carrying a child."

Yes because I seem to crash into every vehicle that doesn't have one. rolleyes

Motorrad

Original Poster:

6,811 posts

216 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Pothole said:
This is a non-story.
We haven't had it this week on PH and frankly anything that 'proves' these people are assholes is fine by me.

terenceb

1,488 posts

200 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Seems to me that these type of signs usually graduate to "Mummy's Little Princess"and so on,wtf is this country coming to,every body being obsessed with children-pathetic!

Hoofy

80,056 posts

311 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
Riknos said:
The stickers serve as a warning to me - This driver is probably spending 50% of their time looking in the rear mirror at the kids and talking to them, and not watching the road!
The trouble is, you're only going to experience an accident with them if you're in front of them thus not having the benefit of the "baby on board" warning. nuts

KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

204 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
KarlMac said:
some reason most women turn into gibbering idiots after having children.
Try not talking out your arse when your trying to make a point.

I suspect the real issue here is the child causing a distraction (crying, throwing up or fighting with a sibling) that causes the drivers awareness of the road to be reduced.

Monkeylegend

29,226 posts

260 months

Thursday 11th October 2012
quotequote all
terenceb said:
every body being obsessed with children-pathetic!
That's evolution for you, what a bh.