Would the insurance pay out in such circumstances?
Would the insurance pay out in such circumstances?
Author
Discussion

MadMullah

Original Poster:

5,299 posts

224 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-209443...

bbc said:
Firefighters cut the roof off a woman's undamaged car to rescue two people she gave shelter to following an accident.

Janice Dunlop narrowly avoided the accident herself when a lorry overturned on the A27 near Arundel, colliding with two cars.

She allowed the pair to wait in her car but firefighters cut the roof off after the two complained of neck pains and paramedics needed to move them.

Mrs Dunlop said she is still unsure whether insurers will replace the car.

She said the accident on Sunday was "complete carnage".

"Seeing a lorry come towards me as I was driving up the hill - I just had to get my car out of the way and hope for the best," she said.

"If I was a second earlier I would have been one of those cars."

She said the pair got out of their car and "found their way" into her Vauxhall Vectra to take refuge.

It was then that they developed neck pain and the emergency services decided to cut the roof off.

Silverbullet767

11,364 posts

237 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all

Birdster

2,548 posts

174 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Why do I get the feeling that this woman will be out of pocket for a good deed.

From the emergency services perspective they took the correct course of action.

The car was not involved in the accident through either her actions, or contact.

pops and bangs

674 posts

188 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
I'm probably missing something but why couldn't the passengers just get out through the door? The car wasn't damaged, and they got in ok.

I thought cutting the roof was if there was no other way out? Or was it because the paramedics did not want the passengers to move much hence lifting them through the roof.

I think the "victims" are the usual no win no fee bds.

maffski

1,905 posts

190 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
pops and bangs said:
I'm probably missing something but why couldn't the passengers just get out through the door?

I thought cutting the roof was if there was no other way out?
Initially they felt OK, but then started with neck pains - usually this would be whiplash, but it could have been a broken neck and adrenaline stopping them noticing at first. So the Fire service like to play safe (and play with their toys) - take the roof off and lift the person out.

Maybe I'll make the next car a convertible...

Toaster Pilot

14,867 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
maffski said:
pops and bangs said:
I'm probably missing something but why couldn't the passengers just get out through the door?

I thought cutting the roof was if there was no other way out?
Initially they felt OK, but then started with neck pains - usually this would be whiplash, but it could have been a broken neck and adrenaline stopping them noticing at first. So the Fire service like to play safe (and play with their toys) - take the roof off and lift the person out.

Maybe I'll make the next car a convertible...
I'm sure there's a news story somewhere of this happening to a Police car due to the same circumstances (accident victims taking shelter in the car etc)

pops and bangs

674 posts

188 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
maffski said:
Initially they felt OK, but then started with neck pains - usually this would be whiplash, but it could have been a broken neck and adrenaline stopping them noticing at first. So the Fire service like to play safe (and play with their toys) - take the roof off and lift the person out.

Maybe I'll make the next car a convertible...
Ah ok that makes sense.

I'm cyncial and first thing that came to mind was "Ching Ching" laugh

If it only ends up being a whiplash claim they make then the women went through that for nothing.


Bungleaio

6,593 posts

233 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
I would say that she should be able to claim from the person who caused the accident in the 1st place.

Although her cas wasn't damaged in the accident it was damaged as a direct result of it.

JonnyFive

29,904 posts

220 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Toaster Pilot said:
I'm sure there's a news story somewhere of this happening to a Police car due to the same circumstances (accident victims taking shelter in the car etc)
I was going to say I think I remember that too.

aka_kerrly

12,506 posts

241 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Bungleaio said:
I would say that she should be able to claim from the person who caused the accident in the 1st place.

Although her cas wasn't damaged in the accident it was damaged as a direct result of it.
I agree with that.

Or the woman whose car had it's roof cut off should get the whiplash payout that the 'victims' are expecting.

AlfaDogvan

2,737 posts

185 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Toaster Pilot said:
maffski said:
pops and bangs said:
I'm probably missing something but why couldn't the passengers just get out through the door?

I thought cutting the roof was if there was no other way out?
Initially they felt OK, but then started with neck pains - usually this would be whiplash, but it could have been a broken neck and adrenaline stopping them noticing at first. So the Fire service like to play safe (and play with their toys) - take the roof off and lift the person out.

Maybe I'll make the next car a convertible...
I'm sure there's a news story somewhere of this happening to a Police car due to the same circumstances (accident victims taking shelter in the car etc)
That's what the coppers told me, after I helped an old dear. She try to chop a tree down with he pegeout, it was pissing it down on a chilly Jan or February morning too. I let her sit in my van, I didn't even think.

having said that the vans got a bench seat in the front so I think you could have got her on a stretcher.

ADV

Birdster

2,548 posts

174 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Bungleaio said:
I would say that she should be able to claim from the person who caused the accident in the 1st place.

Although her cas wasn't damaged in the accident it was damaged as a direct result of it.
But only because she let those people into her car, through her choice. She'll have to fight for it. For the record I do feel that someone should pay for it.

Do the emergency services have insurance for this sort of event? Could it come out of that?

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

204 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
MadMullah said:
Would the insurance pay out in such circumstances?
Yes they would.

MadMullah

Original Poster:

5,299 posts

224 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
MadMullah said:
Would the insurance pay out in such circumstances?
Yes they would.
from the woman's own insurance or the person who caused the accident or even the person who was sat in the car?

soad

34,735 posts

207 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Thread already running:
So much for helping...
http://pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f...

Deva Link

26,934 posts

276 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Toaster Pilot said:
I'm sure there's a news story somewhere of this happening to a Police car due to the same circumstances (accident victims taking shelter in the car etc)
I can think of three that I've seen in the press, two were Mondeos and one was a Skoda. IIRC there was a big fuss about one the Mondeos as it was pretty new.

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

204 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
MadMullah said:
ZOLLAR said:
MadMullah said:
Would the insurance pay out in such circumstances?
Yes they would.
from the woman's own insurance or the person who caused the accident or even the person who was sat in the car?
Her own insurance.
It's not the liable parties fault that she offered a seat in her car.

CYMR0

3,940 posts

231 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
So if she's third party only, she's fecked?

I'm not sure I agree...

Having sat in the woman's car, the victims developed reasonably foreseeable injuries as a result of the accident.

The decision was taken that it was medically necessary to remove them via the roof of the car.

I think we can argue it either way, but for the cost of an old Vectra, most insurers would be wise to pay up without admitting liability.

ZOLLAR

19,920 posts

204 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
CYMR0 said:
So if she's third party only, she's fecked?

I'm not sure I agree...

Having sat in the woman's car, the victims developed reasonably foreseeable injuries as a result of the accident.

The decision was taken that it was medically necessary to remove them via the roof of the car.

I think we can argue it either way, but for the cost of an old Vectra, most insurers would be wise to pay up without admitting liability.
Yes

Lordglenmorangie

3,071 posts

236 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
ZOLLAR said:
MadMullah said:
ZOLLAR said:
MadMullah said:
Would the insurance pay out in such circumstances?
Yes they would.
from the woman's own insurance or the person who caused the accident or even the person who was sat in the car?
Her own insurance.
It's not the liable parties fault that she offered a seat in her car.
I believe you are right, whatever happens come renewal time she is in for a surprise , silly cow .