Choosing between BMW E46 and E60?
Choosing between BMW E46 and E60?
Author
Discussion

TroubledSoul

Original Poster:

4,668 posts

224 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
Price wise the two are very similar in 3.0 diesel form, so it seems sensible to at least consider the 5 Series while looking at the E46. I'd have to upgrade it over time to Sport spec and at least as good suspension as an OEM Sport, if not better. But otherwise, how do they compare on a like for like basis? I know the 5 is a bit bigger, but does it lose anything in the driving/handling stakes?

Does it take to mods well? Is it well built?

kev b

2,756 posts

196 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
I have an E46 328Ci and a 525d E60 LCI, both autos. Apart from looks, the E60 wipes the floor with my E46.

The E46 requires so much more attention to keep it on top form due to the suspension being too fragile for our roads, whilst the E60 showing 60,000 miles has never needed any parts or adjustment at all.

E46 gives 24mpg arond town and 36mpg on a good run whilst the E60 returns mid 40s up to 56mpg in the same conditions but the main difference is the diesel has so much torque that it leaves the revvy petrol for dead.

Comparing like for like the 5series is better built, rides better, is roomier quieter and feels classier. On the other hand on the right roads the 3series is lot more nimble feeling and still looks good despite first appearing in the mid 90's, the problem is E46 saloons are now approaching Banger status whilst E60s still look fresh.

Also manual 3series have a heavyish clutch and clunky gearchange, I have not seen a manual E60 diesel to compare but suspect they are the same if you can find one.

TomM

662 posts

225 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
No contest. E60. So much more car.

TroubledSoul

Original Poster:

4,668 posts

224 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
How do the two handle in comparison? I'd be putting sports suspension on the 5er.

kev b

2,756 posts

196 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
They are chalk and cheese really, E60 is SE on 17" NRF tyres, the ESC kicks in pretty early but handling is very predictable. E46 on 18" is pretty poor on anything but smooth roads, sadly all our local roads are terrible meaning it follows imperfections, crashes and lurches off bumps and needs a suspension overhaul every couple of years, alignment needs to be done twice a year at least.

The chassis components are nowhere near as tough as the E60 so if your roads are anything like mine and you can't do your own servicing I would say go with the E60 especially with the relatively heavy diesel 6 cyl up front.

In 45000 miles my E46 has had four front TCAs, RTABs, rear springs, discs all round and the subframe mountings repaired whilst the E60 with more miles covered, owned from new has needed nothing but tyres and is still on the original brake pads.

I still love my E46 with its howling petrol 6 cylinder and good looks but if I had a choice for the same outlay it would have to be the 5 series for me.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
TroubledSoul said:
How do the two handle in comparison? I'd be putting sports suspension on the 5er.
It's all a matter of personal taste but I've never been in a BMW with sports suspension which didn't have appalling ride quality. Even worse if combined with low profile tyres.

340600

609 posts

173 months

Saturday 12th January 2013
quotequote all
In terms of handling the 530 can be a bit wallowy when really pushing on but I'm sure sports suspension would sort that.

Build quality, economy, performance and longevity are all excellent on the E60. Can't comment on the E46 but I know which one I'd choose.

parapaul

2,828 posts

228 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
The E46 is one of the best looking BMWs ever made. The E60 is, without doubt, the ugliest.

Peculiar choice...

mike9009

10,963 posts

273 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
parapaul said:
The E46 is one of the best looking BMWs ever made. The E60 is, without doubt, the ugliest.

Peculiar choice...
It all depends whether you by a car to look at or to drive?

Patrick Bateman

13,195 posts

204 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
Bit of an odd comparison.

For what it's worth, the e46 has the e60 licked in looks and interior. Never liked the shape of the dash in the e60 compared with the e46/39.

Suspension components aren't that expensive despite what some might like to say so it's not like it's a massive deal to change bushes etc.

Patrick Bateman

13,195 posts

204 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
mike9009 said:
It all depends whether you by a car to look at or to drive?
Most people would prefer their car to be a looker though, doesn't mean it has to be crap.

EddieFelson

1,168 posts

244 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
mike9009 said:
It all depends whether you by a car to look at or to drive?
It's looks are part of the overall package.

You don't buy a house with an stunning exterior that looks like a bombs hit it.

g3org3y

22,499 posts

221 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
I'd avoid the E46. It's the "barry car of choice". biggrin

billywhizzzzzz

2,633 posts

173 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
The e60 is the more modern car - in effect one generation on from the e46. E46 feels old hat, and a little anodyne. Even in their day they were a little too honda like. The e60 M Sport Touring on the other hand still looks stunning. In any book on the best car designs of the last 100 years, you'll find the e60. And, no, you wont find the e46 however competent a car it was on its launch

surveyor

18,699 posts

214 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
We have a 07 520d which has done 147,000 miles. In its life non service bill have been an AC pipe which was holed, and a spring IAn handbrake shoe.)

Personally I think the standard BMW suspension is quite firm enough.

Patrick Bateman

13,195 posts

204 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
billywhizzzzzz said:
In any book on the best car designs of the last 100 years, you'll find the e60. And, no, you wont find the e46 however competent a car it was on its launch
Based on what?

mike9009

10,963 posts

273 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
EddieFelson said:
mike9009 said:
It all depends whether you by a car to look at or to drive?
It's looks are part of the overall package.

You don't buy a house with an stunning exterior that looks like a bombs hit it.
But the OP knows what each car looks like and wants to know about handling, performance etc.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

218 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
The E46 is a good car but has plenty of issues that will require plenty of cash even if you are prepared to get your own hands dirty. It was essentially a development of the E36 and failed to fix all the issues.

I've never driven an E60 but I had an E39 and it felt like a much better car. I'm sure the E60 is even better.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

234 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
I traded my E60 for an E46, mainly due to iDrive problems, but also because it didnt have enough power (mine was 2.2 520). I was a fan of the styling, which seems to have aged fairly well - mine was an early E60 on a 53 plate. It had more callouts than any other car for non starting though, iDrive packing up, windows opening while locked (nothing was ever stolen). I was never quite comfy in it either, I think having as many seating options as it did meant I was always fiddling with it and couldnt quite get a position where my legs and arms agreed that was a good way to sit. I wasnt uncomfortable, more thought I could be more comfy if the front of the seat went down, then the back came up, then the support in, then back out again. Forgot what I was supposed to be doing half the time

The 3 series in comparison was a much quicker, more agile car. It looked and felt better to drive on most roads. It had the M Tech kit on it, and the suspension was pretty firm for most backs. It was a lot slimmer though, so if you're portly in stature with a family then it might be a struggle to get all and everything in. The boot's not great in them. I really loved it, was a great car to own and drive. I p/x'd it as it was costing a bit on tyres and servicing (dealer obligatory) and there was always something in my mind about the auto gearbox needing some £££ once the warranty ran out.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

234 months

Sunday 13th January 2013
quotequote all
TroubledSoul said:
How do the two handle in comparison? I'd be putting sports suspension on the 5er.
Apparently there is a cheap mod based on Audi ride and handling

Take the shock absorbers off and drill a hole at the top and at the bottom.

Drain the oil out and replace it with wet cement

Quickly refit them to the car and get some fat people to sit in it for 24hours


Then bingo you have the full s-line experience