When a 'new' model really meant 'new'
Discussion
Eighteeteewhy said:
They don't make em like they used too...
Take this Escort model change for example, two totally different cars. Not some new lights, new seats and a iPod connector.


Am I just getting old?
@
Poor example. That's not so much an example of an old vs new model as an example of how to ruin a brilliant car and almost destroy a brand. Take this Escort model change for example, two totally different cars. Not some new lights, new seats and a iPod connector.


Am I just getting old?
@
Superhoop said:
But some cars are all new
Old Mazda6

New Mazda6

All they share is the name, and possibly the wheel nuts
Very lazy designing like the golf mk6 and mk7. Ok every body panel may be new, but the overall design is just a tarted up version of the previous one with parts changed for the sake of changing. Or were you being ironic?Old Mazda6

New Mazda6

All they share is the name, and possibly the wheel nuts
DrTre said:
Superhoop said:
But some cars are all new
Old Mazda6

New Mazda6

All they share is the name, and possibly the wheel nuts
Blimey. That'd be damn nearly the epitome of what the OP is talking about for me.Old Mazda6

New Mazda6

All they share is the name, and possibly the wheel nuts
I claim first on Audi, MB and BMW being the worst of the lot.
These 2 are a bit different.
Vauxhall probably do this more than any other manufacturer.
Mk1 Cavalier -> Mk2 Cavalier -> Mk3 Cavalier -> Vectra -> Insignia all new platforms (for better or worse!)
The Mk4 & Mk5 astras have the same basic chassis, but pretty much everything bolted to them changed, all others are completely different.
Corsas too.
I think the French manufacturers tend to do this too ?
Mk1 Cavalier -> Mk2 Cavalier -> Mk3 Cavalier -> Vectra -> Insignia all new platforms (for better or worse!)
The Mk4 & Mk5 astras have the same basic chassis, but pretty much everything bolted to them changed, all others are completely different.
Corsas too.
I think the French manufacturers tend to do this too ?
I think the OP confuses looking different with actually being different.
Why the hell would you make your new model totally disrupt your brand image or design language just to emphasise that it's a totally different car underneath? Almost all of the examples cited are truly new cars, because all major components are redesigned or replaced. So long as you make it look different enough that people can tell, what's the problem?
Why the hell would you make your new model totally disrupt your brand image or design language just to emphasise that it's a totally different car underneath? Almost all of the examples cited are truly new cars, because all major components are redesigned or replaced. So long as you make it look different enough that people can tell, what's the problem?
OP, you're not thinking correctly.
An example: the 'new' Fiesta is actually an MCA - Mid-Cycle Action. To non-auto industry folks, it's a facelift. Not a new model, just an update to an existing one. There will be a REAL all-new Fiesta (on the B3 platform) in around 2020.
The same situation with the Focus. The last new model was the C346 in 2010/11 with a facelift in a few years and then the all-new model in 2018 or so.
An example: the 'new' Fiesta is actually an MCA - Mid-Cycle Action. To non-auto industry folks, it's a facelift. Not a new model, just an update to an existing one. There will be a REAL all-new Fiesta (on the B3 platform) in around 2020.
The same situation with the Focus. The last new model was the C346 in 2010/11 with a facelift in a few years and then the all-new model in 2018 or so.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








