All Speed Limits removed, what would happen ?
All Speed Limits removed, what would happen ?
Author
Discussion

J4CKO

Original Poster:

47,005 posts

231 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Would it be utter carnage ?

I am not sure it would be that different really.

Jasandjules

72,662 posts

260 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Not at all.

There would be some Darwin taking place but in the main people I think are content at speeds which are comfortable.

Eighteeteewhy

7,259 posts

199 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Daytime would be about the same. However I think night time would be a different story

lightthefuse

426 posts

203 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Not very much.

Of course you'd have tools going beyond their limits, but then you have that with booze, drugs and other things... negative for the environment (increased fuel consumption), positive for the economy (shorter journey times). With increased efficiency of engines though, that problem would be taken care of by itself I feel. One problem, where would Nanny State get her money to replace the speeding fines and camera pork?

200bhp

5,802 posts

250 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Lots of young lads would die.

Whilst that may be seen as a good thing by some, they would probably take out a lot of innocent people along the way.

fangio

989 posts

265 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Would be like before 1965, but with better, safer vehicles...........

31mph

1,308 posts

166 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Don't kid yourselves.

It would be mayhem.

Wills2

29,813 posts

206 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
I think speeds would rise slightly 40 in what was a 30? 55 in a 40? so not much different.

The gloves would come off at night as has been said.



poing

8,743 posts

231 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
No speed limits? I'd be dead, within a week!

HustleRussell

26,638 posts

191 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
31mph said:
Don't kid yourselves.

It would be mayhem.
This, I suspect

Grenoble

59,812 posts

186 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
In areas where the traffic flows well, or there is little, mayhem, as young or inexperienced drivers mistake "no limit" for "free for all", especially in towns, with in increase in pedestrian fatalities.

Outside of that, and on busy motorways, a few extra bangs, but not much different. You can only speed up if the space in front allows...

wst

3,504 posts

192 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
On roads where the conditions mean you can't drive at the speed limit already, no change. On SC roads where you can, speeds would probably increase but accidents would not, because people were probably travelling at those speeds anyway but now would not be wasting attention looking for scameras.

Motorways and DCs would be the big change, I can imagine lorries would act as a speed buffer. There'd be big problems unless people learned to follow at sensible distances but I imagine the usual top speed for people would be the psychological 100, unless fuel cost or car suitability was reining them in (80 is plenty with my car!).

After about 1am out on the motorways and DCs it'd be... interesting. Back to cafe racers? Possibly! There's a pair of roundabouts at each end of the bypass around my town - I can easily imagine people racing from one end of the town to the other, and back, to see who sets the fastest time...

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

277 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
200bhp said:
Lots of young lads would die.......they would probably take out a lot of innocent people along the way.
^^^ This

StevoCally

190 posts

214 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
I think I'd probably:

- Drive around the same in what were 20 zones.
- Increase my speed in what were the 30 zones to about 35/40.
- Stick to what the 50-60 roads were unless arrow straight then I'd push towards 70.
- Dual carriageways probably 70-80.
- Motorways 90-100.

Obviously these would be applicable when conditions allowed like summertime with suitable adjustment in rain or dark conditions.

It could help to prevent some accidents as it would place the emphasis on the driver to read the road correctly and adjust, but with many drivers seeing the current speed limits as targets rather than taking in information from other sources I think it would be mayhem. The potential for massive speed differences on the same piece of road means I personally wouldn't want it to happen.

Burnham

3,668 posts

290 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
31mph said:
Don't kid yourselves.

It would be mayhem.
This, I suspect
Yeah, Id pretty much drive as fast as I could on the motorway.

Grenoble

59,812 posts

186 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
wst said:
On roads where the conditions mean you can't drive at the speed limit already, no change. On SC roads where you can, speeds would probably increase but accidents would not, because people were probably travelling at those speeds anyway but now would not be wasting attention looking for scameras.
...
Accident frequency might be the same, but outcomes would be different - energy increases massively with speed, so the crashes would have more injuries - as average vehicle speed,and therefore crash speed increased?

MC Bodge

29,925 posts

206 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Urban areas would quite possibly be mayhem -Many people would not drive to the conditions.

Rural roads? possibly very little different from how it was before the NSL was replaced wholesale with 50 & 40mph limits, until reaching a village, where many wouldn't slow down.

Motorways? Some people would drive faster, but not everybody, like in Germany.
-although some people would have you believe that everybody drives absolutely flat out over there, they really don't.

Edited by MC Bodge on Monday 25th February 23:13

northwest monkey

6,370 posts

220 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
fangio said:
Would be like before 1965, but with better, safer vehicles...........
And an awful lot more vehicles in general. Going an awful lot faster than they did in 1965.

Not for me thanks.

CraigyMc

18,372 posts

267 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
Would it be utter carnage ?

I am not sure it would be that different really.
I'd drive to my best judgement, which is exactly what I do now, but I'd spend less of my attention scanning for speed vans/unmarked cars.

I'd be safer (that is, my driving would be safer). I suspect the hooligan mob would "darwin" themselves.

C

ModernAndy

2,094 posts

166 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
The problem I see with people doing silly speeds is not that it isn't safe to do so (although in many cases it most definitely isn't safe) but that it would be very difficult for traffic to move smoothly if everybody is doing a different speed.

You can see this on the motorway when it's busy. A lot of people doing bang on 70 overtaking the people doing 50, 60, 65, etc. getting tailgated by people who think they own the road and that it's 'safe' to do 80, 90, 100 and so on. Lots of short, sharp braking ensues and the road gets slower because gaps between cars are getting smaller and people keep hitting the brakes to keep from going into the back of each other. Then, of course, you get stupid accidents starting to happen as people are getting too close because they think they have the right to push slower (i.e. doing the speed limit) traffic out of the way.

In short, I don't care what the speed limit is as long as people stick to it when there is other traffic about but in my opinion, 70mph is a pretty good speed when you consider fuel economy, stopping distance and all the other factors.