Would you buy an ex-Evo car?
Would you buy an ex-Evo car?
Author
Discussion

tjob

Original Poster:

782 posts

182 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Hello people,

I've pretty much done a deal on a car, but during the usual checks it appears to have been owned (from new until 24k miles ish) by the boys over at Evo magazine, used and abused on track and abroad...Lots of motorway miles too, but lots of proper thrashing too!

Its now done 52,000 miles, with the second owner (He doesn't know the cars previous owner, so he clearly didn't google much)

The car is meant to be used hard, its the way manufacturer intended, but would it put you off? Its an RS of sorts...

I'm buying the car to retail, so what would you think if you stumbled across this fact when looking to buy yourself a new car?

Thanks

DanielSan

20,106 posts

198 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
I'd think that it's no doubt been maintained to pretty much the highest standard a car could be and owned by a genuine enthusiast whose used the car as intended. A good buy.

ajh38

902 posts

181 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
It wouldn't sway me either way at this point in its life. Some people will see it as a bonus.

Bear Phils

891 posts

167 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
If this is the Clio, then almost all of them will have seen track time or hard driving. At least you know what this has been through.

The Wookie

14,209 posts

259 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Nope, plenty of 'well maintained' cars out there that haven't been given death for most of their lives.

I'd consider a manufacturer press car though given a decent deal as they typically are maintained beyond the call of duty.

GregMac

247 posts

180 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
I wouldn't buy a press car

The Wookie

14,209 posts

259 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
doogz said:
Often have blueprinted/not entirely standard engine too.
I doubt anything non-standard (at least at the time of de-fleeting) as it could introduce a liability issue. Best you could hope for is new or blueprinted parts.

tjob

Original Poster:

782 posts

182 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Its not a press car as such, it was just purchased by Evo and run for a year as part of the long term cars...

C2james

4,685 posts

196 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
tjob said:
Its not a press car as such, it was just purchased by Evo and run for a year as part of the long term cars...
can we have a picture please? biggrin

chryslerben

1,271 posts

190 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
I'd think that it's no doubt been maintained to pretty much the highest standard a car could be and owned by a genuine enthusiast whose used the car as intended. A good buy.
roflroflrofl

you must be the owner Shirley?

If it was then its undoubtedly the first motoring journalist ever to have done so.

Captain Muppet

8,540 posts

296 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
tjob said:
Its not a press car as such, it was just purchased by Evo and run for a year as part of the long term cars...
I'd regard it as an ex-hire car rented exclusively to the mechanically belligerent.

And avoid it.

Garlick

40,601 posts

271 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
GregMac said:
I wouldn't buy a press car
I absolutely would.

Muzzer79

13,243 posts

218 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
I wouldn't buy a press car - remember, it likely won't just have been EVO using it....

If it's just one they've bought and ran on the fleet then that's different.

I'd be more concerned about how the second owner has treated it, rather than EVO as that's more relevant to it's condition now.

The Wookie

14,209 posts

259 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
doogz said:
I've read of ex Citroen press cars having higher than normal lift on camshafts, 70k miles later when someone's got around to rebuilding it for one reason or another.
Gallic shrug to liability I suppose!

The Wookie

14,209 posts

259 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Captain Muppet said:
tjob said:
Its not a press car as such, it was just purchased by Evo and run for a year as part of the long term cars...
I'd regard it as an ex-hire car rented exclusively to the mechanically belligerent.

And avoid it.
Spot on

Digger

17,044 posts

222 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
By reading the documented Long Term blogs on the vehicle, it might appear useful to read about any of the ownership upsides, downsides, as well as any maintenance and/or parts replaced on the car, assuming of course that this was all done in a timely manner!?

A little bit of provenance, if you will.

Shirt587

360 posts

166 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Captain Muppet said:
I'd regard it as an ex-hire car rented exclusively to the mechanically belligerent.

And avoid it.
hehehehe Good turn of phrase!

Hoygo

725 posts

192 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Absolutely go for it,whats to doubt here? Maintenance is well documented on the magazine and mag owned cars are always taken care of better than any car out there.

What car is it?

GregMac

247 posts

180 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Garlick said:
GregMac said:
I wouldn't buy a press car
I absolutely would.
Really?

davepoth

29,395 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th March 2013
quotequote all
Ring them up and ask them maybe? They'll tell you if it ever ended up backwards into armco.

I'm in two minds. Yes it's a bit of a risk, but is it as much of a risk as buying a car that used to be owned by 74 year old Mavis, who would slip the clutch at 6,000rpm while parking, and used to run over kerbs because she didn't see them?