Top heavy Trasporter!
Author
Discussion

AM-BM

Original Poster:

261 posts

231 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
I'm sure this is illegal? How dangerous, any slight swerve and it's going to tip over and cause mayhem?!


cst

410 posts

215 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
Does look a little unstable!

Zed Ed

1,165 posts

214 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
You've not seen the latest galaxy cloaking option then?

Buff Mchugelarge

3,316 posts

181 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
Zed Ed said:
You've not seen the latest galaxy cloaking option then?
laugh

Getragdogleg

10,293 posts

214 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
I agree it looks a bit odd but It is a rigid 4 wheeler lorry and there is more weight below the imaginary horizontal centre line than above. The car up the front is a smaller car isn't it ? not another Galaxy.

I would not have left it like that but only because I think it looks untidy, I would have no problem driving it from a safety or stability point of view.

MJK 24

5,679 posts

267 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
It's not top heavy, but it's top heavier than it needs to be if that makes sense!

Idleness on the part of the driver not dropping the rear of the deck.

AM-BM

Original Poster:

261 posts

231 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
it was weaving down the motorway!

jayfrancis

439 posts

239 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
Nothing wrong with that. Cars weigh nothing compared to trucks. Used to run artics and drags like that all the time.

Remember the top deck cars have to go on first, it's the only way to load them.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
As others have already stated it isnt dangerous or illegal, although it isnt ideal. Itd certainly be nicer to drive with the cars on the bottom level.

okie592

2,711 posts

198 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
I agree it looks a bit odd but It is a rigid 4 wheeler lorry and there is more weight below the imaginary horizontal centre line than above. The car up the front is a smaller car isn't it ? not another Galaxy.

I would not have left it like that but only because I think it looks untidy, I would have no problem driving it from a safety or stability point of view.
Call yourself a car buff?

Clearly a focus and a s max corrrr

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,039 posts

266 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
AM-BM said:
I'm sure this is illegal? How dangerous, any slight swerve and it's going to tip over and cause mayhem?!

Says the person photographing from the driver's seat (unless LHD biggrin)

Getragdogleg

10,293 posts

214 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
okie592 said:
Getragdogleg said:
I agree it looks a bit odd but It is a rigid 4 wheeler lorry and there is more weight below the imaginary horizontal centre line than above. The car up the front is a smaller car isn't it ? not another Galaxy.

I would not have left it like that but only because I think it looks untidy, I would have no problem driving it from a safety or stability point of view.
Call yourself a car buff?

Clearly a focus and a s max corrrr
My car interest peaked at around 1988, I am quite happy that I have no idea what either of those little shopping boxes are !

hehe

Getragdogleg

10,293 posts

214 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
AM-BM said:
it was weaving down the motorway!
So it was doing some "slight swerves" and did not fall over...

A900ss

3,314 posts

183 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
MJK 24 said:
It's not top heavy, but it's top heavier than it needs to be if that makes sense!

Idleness on the part of the driver not dropping the rear of the deck.
^^^^^^ What he said.

s p a c e m a n

12,146 posts

179 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
Why on earth would they do that on purpose, it must be broken.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

286 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
jayfrancis said:
Nothing wrong with that. Cars weigh nothing compared to trucks. Used to run artics and drags like that all the time.

Remember the top deck cars have to go on first, it's the only way to load them.
That's well over 3 tonnes on the top deck, and it certainly doesn't look like a particularly heavy truck. That much weight, that high up is guaranteed to have a significant impact on stability. Car transporters fall over pretty easily even when they have cars on the lower deck as well, found one on it's side on the A303 a few months back.

fastka

156 posts

219 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
i imagine if the VOSA had seen it, they would have pulled him over and his pants down.

Getragdogleg

10,293 posts

214 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
I bet that is around 9 tons unladen, probably more, a lot of decking and hydraulics.

I'm not saying it is right and I would do it but It's not particularly unsafe and certainly not illegal.

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
That's well over 3 tonnes on the top deck, and it certainly doesn't look like a particularly heavy truck. That much weight, that high up is guaranteed to have a significant impact on stability. Car transporters fall over pretty easily even when they have cars on the lower deck as well, found one on it's side on the A303 a few months back.
My guess is that if you knew what you were talking about, then you would know the exact weight of the truck.

Its max weight will be 18,000 kilos.

Getragdogleg

10,293 posts

214 months

Saturday 23rd March 2013
quotequote all
fastka said:
i imagine if the VOSA had seen it, they would have pulled him over and his pants down.
For what ? Axle loading are probably ok, the cars are secure. The top deck is not overloaded or exceeding design specifications.

It looks daft and is catching more wind the way he has it loaded but he might have just dropped two off and is on the way ten minutes up the road to get two more.