Mechanic wrecks customers 300 SL Gullwing
Mechanic wrecks customers 300 SL Gullwing
Author
Discussion

8vFTW

Original Poster:

415 posts

184 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
clicky



Ouch. Article said the garage is insured for events like this. But how do you go about repairing that mess?

stormy22

793 posts

168 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Who cares about repairing it. It is ruined!! Now it has been trashed, the value will never be the same...EVER!

Megaflow

11,649 posts

256 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
I fear somebody is going to be on the receiving end of some serious VBRJ from his employer...

WTFWT

872 posts

254 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Kind puts the 250 miles on the BRZ saga into perspective.

The car does look sad sat there at the side of the road. That said, there is no way they will let this die. She will live on!

vescaegg

30,603 posts

198 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Jesus. What are they worth at the moment? Half a million?

Mechanic must have been driving like a tt. It's not exactly a 'lost the back end' type car is it.

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

279 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Ouch that's not a nice sight.

kambites

71,682 posts

252 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
vescaegg said:
Mechanic must have been driving like a tt. It's not exactly a 'lost the back end' type car is it.
I was under the impression that they were extremely difficult cars on the limit? Obviously never driven one to test that theory, though. hehe

Shame and the mechanic is obviously an idiot, but I'm sure it'll be repaired to at least the condition it was in before the accident and I don't think this kind of car loses value from having been repaired as long as it's done properly?

RB Will

10,907 posts

271 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Not quite in the same league but I think this sort of thing happens fairly regularly. I worked for a dealer where mechanics managed to destroy a Lotus Exige and a 911 GT2 neither got sacked.

Disco_Biscuit

837 posts

225 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
What a waste of a beautiful and rare car. :-(

chevronb37

6,472 posts

217 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
kambites said:
vescaegg said:
Mechanic must have been driving like a tt. It's not exactly a 'lost the back end' type car is it.
I was under the impression that they were extremely difficult cars on the limit? Obviously never driven one to test that theory, though. hehe

Shame and the mechanic is obviously an idiot, but I'm sure it'll be repaired to at least the condition it was in before the accident and I don't think this kind of car loses value from having been repaired as long as it's done properly?
My understanding is that the rear suspension set-up isn't good for high performance motoring. The inside rear wheel has a habit of 'tucking under' causing all manner of problems. Very difficult and unpredictable to drive on the limit, apparently.

pad58

12,549 posts

212 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
I didn't know they had airbags back in 1957?biglaugh

g3org3y

22,523 posts

222 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Error!

Difficult to assess the situation with only one photo but trying to look in the distance, road looks pretty straight to me.

kambites said:
Shame and the mechanic is obviously an idiot, but I'm sure it'll be repaired to at least the condition it was in before the accident and I don't think this kind of car loses value from having been repaired as long as it's done properly?
It must do, especially given the amount of work that's going to be required to get the car back to the same standard.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

259 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
shout PumaUk7

Strawman

6,463 posts

238 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
chevronb37 said:
My understanding is that the rear suspension set-up isn't good for high performance motoring. The inside rear wheel has a habit of 'tucking under' causing all manner of problems. Very difficult and unpredictable to drive on the limit, apparently.
Yes I read an article about some old journalist reminiscing about testing one when they were first released. in a spirited drive early one morning down deserted lanes he managed to put it on it's side but when righted again it wasn't damaged much.

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

253 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
article said:
test drive and joy ride.
So which was it then? rolleyes

Jibberingloon

851 posts

231 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Whoooppppppps

williamp

20,464 posts

304 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
stormy22 said:
Who cares about repairing it. It is ruined!! Now it has been trashed, the value will never be the same...EVER!
Of course it will. Its almost 60 years old. It would have been restored before, it will again. Insurance will cover it. An inconvenience, but it wont be ruined

And they wre very tricky cars zto drive. Wo knows:maybe the owner had rEported handling problems which were being looked at, maybe a fresh restoration with something not quite tight, maybe drIver error.

If everyone is ok, then everything else can be repaired. So relax

GC8

19,910 posts

221 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
vescaegg said:
Jesus. What are they worth at the moment? Half a million?

Mechanic must have been driving like a tt. It's not exactly a 'lost the back end' type car is it.
Nicknamed 'the widow-maker' due to its errant handling characteristics,thats exactly what it is.

Still: not what youd expect on a test drive.

sasha320

598 posts

279 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
RB Will said:
Not quite in the same league but I think this sort of thing happens fairly regularly. I worked for a dealer where mechanics managed to destroy a Lotus Exige and a 911 GT2 neither got sacked.
I think the dealer would have to prove gross misconduct / negligence etc to sack an employee who totalled a car on a test drive and in turn it would be exceptionally difficult to prove gross misconduct / negligence unless really reliable witnesses and / or the Police witnessed the accident.

In fact more scrutiny would be levelled on the employer to make sure they had taken all reasonable steps to ensure the employee wasn't exposed to undue risk in taking the test drive and / or had been supported if they were injured and / or when they returned to work.

Seems counter intuitive I guess.



storminnorman

2,357 posts

183 months

Saturday 30th March 2013
quotequote all
Ecurie Ecosse said:
Reminds me of when Nick Mason was at the track and a driver crashed his (I think) GT40 at the time. Nick simply looked up from his newspaper, raised his eyebrows, then carried on reading.
I think any owner of a racing car knows it's a matter of when, not if, their car gets stacked so I'm not surprised.
Highly valuable road cars however, I'm in awe that the owner "remained calm".