RE: Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 Roadster: Review
RE: Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 Roadster: Review
Thursday 16th May 2013

Lamborghini Aventador LP700-4 Roadster: Review

Characterful but flawed - but will its buyers really give a damn?



For all its theatrical styling, the Murcielago Roadster of 2005 was a flawed car for two reasons. Firstly, the decapitated body structure lacked an awful lot of torsional rigidity – “The old girls flexed so much we thought the windscreens would pop out when they were driven out of the showroom,” said one senior Lamborghini figure – and secondly, the canvas roof was comical at best. It leaked like a sieve, took 20 minutes to erect, looked faintly ridiculous in situ and simply blew off at three-figure speeds.

There isn't much that looks angrier
There isn't much that looks angrier
The technical information for the Aventador Roadster suggests that those two concerns have been rectified. The new car’s torsional rigidity is actually better than that of the Gallardo coupe, and the removable roof is now solid carbon fibre. A twin-panel item, it stows in just a couple of minutes and does a good impression of a fixed roof when in place, but when stashed in the front boot there’s only enough luggage space left over for a pair of soft leather moccasins. Overall, though, it’s a better and more practical solution than the old flying squirrel assembly.

Whipping the roof panels off also seems to visually lower the car’s overall height and exaggerate its width. In the manner of a great Lamborghini, the Roadster is sensational to behold and entirely OTT. When viewed alongside a Murcielago, though, the details do seem fussy.

Attention seeker
The cabin matches the exterior’s flamboyance ahere can be no doubt that you’re at the helm of a genuine, fearsome supercar. In common with the coupe, the basic structure is a carbon fibre monocoque – hence that much improved rigidity – and the engine is an all-new 6.5-litre V12 that’s good for 700hp at a scarcely believable 8,250rpm. The only transmission option is an automated seven-speed gearbox with four-wheel drive. The brakes are carbon ceramic, and the suspension uses a sophisticated push-rod layout.

Fast corners bring the big Lambo to life
Fast corners bring the big Lambo to life
Can a mid-engined V12 supercar ever feel at home in the city? The Roadster does little to convince us that it can, because although there is reasonable visibility fore and aft, the ride is very firm indeed and the gearbox can be downright infuriating. Upshifts are very jerky unless you lift off the throttle deliberately, and kickdown is at first dim-witted, then violent. With no creep built into the system, low-speed maneuvering is a hassle.

Clunk click, every trip
This is a Lamborghini, not a Nissan Micra, though. As you escape the city and venture onto more open roads, the ride improves dramatically as the dampers absorb bumps and compressions quite well. Switching the gearbox into its manual setting allows you to smooth out the shifts a little, but the ’box still requires much more concentration than is ideal.

Gearbox can make tight spaces a chore
Gearbox can make tight spaces a chore
The Roadster feels alive and agile the moment you tip it into a fast corner. It responds very keenly to steering inputs and remains dead flat through to the exit. The steering is well-weighted and feels very direct, but at the turn in point to medium- and high-speed corners there is a slight disconnect that can be quite alarming. As you load up the chassis through the corner the steering weight improves and it feels an awful lot better, but the wheel never drips with feel.

Instantly, the gearbox becomes the limiting factor. The shift speeds are never in question, but the jerkiness does hamper your rhythm, so you switch the car from the default Strada mode into Sport. The gearbox becomes more intuitive and the extra steering weight helps to disguise that slight aloofness on turn in, but the dampers have now been stiffened, too. That’s fine on very smooth roads, but on lumpy surfaces the Roadster is robbed of all compliance. It no longer has sufficient damping to carry speed across even moderately broken roads.

Size matters
In second and third gear corners the Roadster feels its size and weight. There’s a slight reluctance to change direction quickly and for a split second as you jump on the brakes you fear that you aren’t going to shed sufficient speed. In fact, the brakes are consistently very strong indeed, but the pedal requires a big shove and there’s little feel. Additionally, the seats don’t offer sufficient lateral support.

Prosser gets his pose on for the cameras
Prosser gets his pose on for the cameras
The whole driving experience improves dramatically on smoother, more open roads where there is limitless pleasure to be had from pouring from one corner into another. Grip into and through corners is very strong indeed with the front axle gently letting go first if you do overcook things. Traction is all but unbreakable on the road, which inspires massive confidence when the surface is greasy. The accessibility of the Roadster’s performance is also quite surprising given its scale and the fearsome reputation of its forebears.

In the right conditions, the Roadster is epic. It doesn’t have a broad spectrum of dynamic ability, though, largely because the Strada and Sport parameters for the suspension and gearbox can’t be divorced from one another. The extreme Corsa mode is best left for circuit driving.

Heart of the matter
At all times, however, the engine is bloody marvelous. Winding it out all the way to 8,250rpm takes a few attempts because it’s such a frantic experience; the volume, the shove in the back and the rate at which the horizon crashes into the front bumper. It’s such a pleasure to enjoy a big capacity, naturally aspirated engine these days. It’s both a masterpiece and the Roadster’s centerpiece.

"Jammy whatsit helpline, how can we help?"
"Jammy whatsit helpline, how can we help?"
Like the Murcielago Roadster, this new model is characterful but flawed. It would be improved greatly by a good twin-clutch gearbox and never mind the weight penalty. The umbrella chassis and transmission modes are no doubt Lamborghini’s defiantly trademark riposte to the increasingly-complicated variable modes of its rivals, but separate parameters for the gearbox and dampers would make the Roadster a more complete performance car.

With all of that being said, it’s worth noting that many of this car’s potential buyers just won’t give a damn about its weaknesses and the brutality of the gearbox will actually be part of the appeal. For them, nothing else will come close to the primal, emotional attraction of the Aventador Roadster.


LAMBORGHINI AVENTADOR LP700-4 ROADSTER
Engine:
6,498cc V12
Transmission: 7-speed automated manual, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 700@8,250rpm
Torque (lb ft): 507@5,500rpm
0-62mph: 3.0 sec
Top speed: 217mph
Weight: 1,625kg (dry)
MPG: 17.7 (combined)
CO2: 370g/km
Price: £294,665

Author
Discussion

Chickentonight

Original Poster:

49 posts

170 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
  • Drools and collapses*

anonymous-user

80 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
I think it's lost some of it's 'wow" factor in losing the roof.

Still have one obviously smile

Dagnut

3,515 posts

219 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
So having a roadster adds no weight and and you only lose insusceptible amounts of stiffness..so why would you have the coupe?

Tuvra

7,926 posts

251 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
garyhun said:
I think it's lost some of it's 'wow" factor in losing the roof.

Still have one obviously smile
+1

I would only take an Aventador if it was the SV model in dark grey hehe :

I am of course joking, a standard Aventador would do wink

anonymous-user

80 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
Tuvra said:
I am of course joking, a standard Aventador would do wink
My god, you're easily pleased wink

FestivAli

1,165 posts

264 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
I do wish car reviews would stop adding caveats of the kind "the potential owner however is unlikely to care". Whilst I personally think a supercar should be hard as nails (as well as having a manual gearbox and rear wheel drive only) it's a waste of (virtual) ink and adds nothing to the article. I stand corrected however if a potential owner or Lamborghini's bods say "(I / our research indicates) don't care if it rides like st and has a terrible gearbox*"


  • I am aware Lamborghini spruiks that owners want a thump in the back on hard changes, as I would too if I had 12 cylinders behind my left ear and could only drive an auto.

pagani1

683 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
I want one but why does it get a 3 rating -I gave it 10

Neil G60

696 posts

250 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
Probably better off with 3 speed auto auto as the only ones you'll see in the UK will be parked up in Mayfair with curbed-to-hell wheels and copies of Pravda on the passenger seat.

JulianCharity

50 posts

200 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
Best looking car on sale today? Yep, gets my vote!

DanProsser

7 posts

189 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
FestivAli said:
I do wish car reviews would stop adding caveats of the kind "the potential owner however is unlikely to care". Whilst I personally think a supercar should be hard as nails (as well as having a manual gearbox and rear wheel drive only) it's a waste of (virtual) ink and adds nothing to the article. I stand corrected however if a potential owner or Lamborghini's bods say "(I / our research indicates) don't care if it rides like st and has a terrible gearbox*"


  • I am aware Lamborghini spruiks that owners want a thump in the back on hard changes, as I would too if I had 12 cylinders behind my left ear and could only drive an auto.
The problem is, cars aren't built to be reviewed, they're built to be sold. Lamborghini knew that many potential Aventador customers wouldn't give a stuff about a jerky gearbox (this is true, I've spoken to lots).

Part of my job is understanding why a manufacturer has done something in a certain way; did the manufacturer simply get it wrong or is there a particular reason for the decision? In this case, there was a reason. It would be deeply ignorant of me to not appreciate that (and arrogant - cars aren't designed purely to get five star reviews from pesky journos), so while it's necessary to highlight the weakness, it's also necessary to raise the caveat.

When a manufacturer has made a misjudgement or downright got something wrong, there's no need for a caveat - just call them out on their balls up!


Stingercut

217 posts

193 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
Gave it a 10 = want. Sadly our horrid British summer weather ruins the experience but I'd still have the roof off at any opportunity just for the engine music alone. That article gave a rather damning indictment of the Murcielago Roadster before though....

Fayaz LP640

185 posts

159 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
So having a roadster adds no weight and and you only lose insusceptible amounts of stiffness..so why would you have the coupe?
Because you just can't stretch that extra fifty odd grand for the roadster? biglaugh

Good point though, modern roadsters have gotten so good that the performance difference to the coupe is really negligible.

delays

792 posts

241 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
PH said:
“The old girls flexed so much we thought the windscreens would pop out when they were driven out of the showroom,” said one senior Lamborghini figure.
yikes

canucklehead

416 posts

172 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
mmm. time to buy a chest wig and some medallions.

Krikkit

27,894 posts

207 months

Thursday 16th May 2013
quotequote all
Bloody hell. Much want right there! I'd put up with that gearbox for that engine, what a machine.

Carnnoisseur

531 posts

180 months

Friday 17th May 2013
quotequote all
If looks could kill, wow.....absolutely stunning

TheBigUnit

364 posts

218 months

Friday 17th May 2013
quotequote all
After 70 ratings, it's currently pulling 5.89. 5.89? It's a naturally aspirated V12 roadster. This is supposed to be a website for car enthusiasts - what more could you want?!

Krikkit

27,894 posts

207 months

Friday 17th May 2013
quotequote all
TheBigUnit said:
After 70 ratings, it's currently pulling 5.89. 5.89? It's a naturally aspirated V12 roadster. This is supposed to be a website for car enthusiasts - what more could you want?!
Well is not an MX-5 or a remapped 335d, so it's going nowhere on PH. tongue out

chrisironside

927 posts

188 months

Friday 17th May 2013
quotequote all
garyhun said:
I think it's lost some of it's 'wow" factor in losing the roof.

Still have one obviously smile
Really?!... I think it looks immense without the roof (as did the Murcielago).
Very low and sleek looking. Absolutely stunning in my opinion.

Also, it's up to 6.8 rating now.
I think I normally would have gone 9 and not 10, but think it's being quite hard done by just now so did 10.

Dagnut

3,515 posts

219 months

Friday 17th May 2013
quotequote all
TheBigUnit said:
After 70 ratings, it's currently pulling 5.89. 5.89? It's a naturally aspirated V12 roadster. This is supposed to be a website for car enthusiasts - what more could you want?!
This is Pistonheads now..you get 20 pages of people arguing about Audi interiors and not even 2 about a beast like this...