RE: Caterham 620R revealed
RE: Caterham 620R revealed
Tuesday 9th July 2013

Caterham 620R revealed

Supercharged R600 evolves into roadgoing, 310hp 620R - hold on to your hat!



Caterham’s joining the fight for Goodwood airtime with a new car of its own to join newcomers like the Vuhl 05 and Alfa Romeo 4C taking to Lord March’s driveway. Well, we say new. It’s a Seven with more power and a bigger pricetag. The polar opposite, then, of the sub-£20K back to basics car we’d been promised.

620R in rare facing directly forwards moment
620R in rare facing directly forwards moment
No matter, that’ll be with us later in the year but for now Caterham is going the other way. And, perhaps unexpectedly, giving us a roadgoing version of the superchargedR600 race car, badged 620R, in keeping with a new naming convention kicked off with the Euro homologated, 240hp Seven 485.

This badge is also a subtle nod that this is a slightly different car from the manic, high-revving and stark raving bonkers R500 Superlight that previously topped the performance charts in the Caterham range. The 620R’s 310hp equates to around 564hp per tonne, a significant increase over the 500’s 263hp and 520hp per tonne. And the supercharger brings 219lb ft of torque into play at 7,350rpm where the 500 was all out at 177lb ft.

But it’s less about the package and how it’s delivered. Stretching the analogy, if the R500 is a gum-chewing express courier arriving in a cloud of tyre smoke and throwing the parcel at your feet (or maybe on them) without stopping for a signature the supercharged Caterham delivers a bigger package but with a little more care and panache. In a smarter van with one of those fancy electronic signature things.

PH had an early taste of a test mule last year
PH had an early taste of a test mule last year
Anyway, tortuous metaphors aside that’s because the supercharger makes the power delivery, immense as it is, a little more progressive and manageable than the all or nothing, 8,500rpm, lit firework R500. Relatively speaking of course, going by Caterham boss Graham MacDonald’s statement in the press release.

“While I wouldn’t necessarily recommend this car for those inexperienced in driving Caterhams,” he says, “we always ensure that even our fastest cars retain the manageable delivery of power that makes them accessible, despite the daunting statistics. We know there is demand for cars that re-write the rules of performance and, if you’re brave enough to take it on, the 620R will be an enormously rewarding, fun car to pilot.”

If our experience of the R600 in the winter gloom at Blyton was anything to go by he’s absolutely right and, moderated power delivery or not, 310hp in a 550kg Caterham is going to be suitably exciting whatever the weather. Completing the spec Caterham has confirmed a DeDion rear axle, wide track front axle, ‘high performance dampers’ and Avon ZZR tyres on 13-inch OZ wheels.

Extra venting in nose marks out supercharged car
Extra venting in nose marks out supercharged car
Like the R600 race car it gets additional ventilation on the nose to feed air to the intercooler and improve cooling plus, going by the pictures, some significant camber on the front wheels. Lashings of carbon, seats included, liven up the interior along with fancy (relatively) new switchgear and a sequential gear selector for the Sadev gearbox as used by the R600, a change from the Quaife unit used by the R500.

And so to another impressive statistic in the 620R’s portfolio – the £49,995 price tag. The launch edition is what Caterham calls the ‘sportier’ R, with a “slightly less hardcore” S version with “more accessibility” to follow later. Either way, that’s £5K more than even a CSR and shades even the £42K asked for the R500. Clearly though the 620R is the Seven for those not scared by big numbers, be they on the spec sheet or pricelist.









   

 

Author
Discussion

LordPetroleum

Original Poster:

371 posts

200 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
£50k for a rollerskate? Bit steep if you ask me.

bertie

8,569 posts

314 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Why does the title say "normally aspirated" and the article says it's supercharged?

bmthnick1981

5,320 posts

246 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
bertie said:
Why does the title say "normally aspirated" and the article says it's supercharged?
Yes, I spotted this too.

storminnorman

2,357 posts

182 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
I love Caterham.
That's all

Megaflow

11,543 posts

255 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all

andyps

7,819 posts

312 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
I think Dan is trying to check if we are reading his posts wink

Whilst this car will no doubt be very good fun, I'm more interested in the promised low end version, and not just because there is more chance I will be able to buy one!

Passeyfier

287 posts

159 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
I was thinking the same as above. Still, this looks fantastic fun in the right conditions. £50k does seem steep when similar "legal" thrills may be had from a lesser model but on the scale of things this doesn't seem too steep for a track day toy. I mean the BAC Mono, albeit maybe more focussed overall, is touching £80k.

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Sounds utterly and completely mental - which is to be applauded.

However the headline states 620BHP/Tonne and naturally aspirated.
The article then says it's 564BHP/Tonne and sports a supercharger.

Or am I missing something?

Flawless Victory

441 posts

195 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
LordPetroleum said:
£50k for a rollerskate? Bit steep if you ask me.
Steep?? It's effing vertical!!! biggrin

sanctum

191 posts

205 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Why does the title say "640R", isn't it the 620R?

Civpilot

6,257 posts

270 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
The article also refers to it as the 620R not the 640R?

And "The 620R's 310hp equates to around 564hp per tonne" not 620 as the headline states

??
Sorry, but that article is very poorly written and hasn't been checked frown

Mr Gearchange

5,892 posts

236 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Are you sure this is even a Caterham? biggrin

Contigo

3,139 posts

239 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Nice Westfield R540!

mikesalt

108 posts

163 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Come on Dan, sort it out! I absolutely appreciate that Pistonheads is free to read, so smaller errors and omissions are perfectly fine but this is riddled. Rough night fella?

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

220 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
bmthnick1981 said:
bertie said:
Why does the title say "normally aspirated" and the article says it's supercharged?
Yes, I spotted this too.
Me too. Also a little confused with the numbers, title says 640R, text then says 620R:

"giving us a roadgoing version of the superchargedR600 race car, badged 620R"


anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Typical of the author I'm afraid. Ham-fisted, leaden prose with the added benefit of factual inaccuracies. On the positive side, what a brilliant vehicle. I would live to have a drive in any Caterham, but especially this. Ace!

Contigo

3,139 posts

239 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Simonium said:
Typical of the author I'm afraid. Ham-fisted, leaden prose with the added benefit of factual inaccuracies. On the positive side, what a brilliant vehicle. I would live to have a drive in any Caterham, but especially this. Ace!
A bit harsh!

Davey S2

13,394 posts

284 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
Can't help thinking the race version would be far better on track and a Supersport R more fun on the road.

I'm looking forward to the new sub £20k model though.

CraigyMc

18,369 posts

266 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
bmthnick1981 said:
bertie said:
Why does the title say "normally aspirated" and the article says it's supercharged?
Yes, I spotted this too.
Dan Trent, are you reading this?

  • It's supercharged, not Naturally Aspirated.
  • It's called the 620R, not the 640R.
  • Caterham haven't announced the weight figure yet. If it weighs 500kg, then it'll have a P/w of 620hp/1000kg.
C

greggy50

6,280 posts

221 months

Tuesday 9th July 2013
quotequote all
I find it amazing how this article has been published with so many errors even the title is wrong ffs

Oh and the car looks mental smile