Why should I not buy this Gen 7 Celica??
Why should I not buy this Gen 7 Celica??
Author
Discussion

Slink

Original Poster:

2,947 posts

203 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
My brother is after a gen 7 celica , the 1.8 VVTLI one with 190 bhp.

he has seen this one with 59,000 miles, but after further looking has seen others that are worth 2500+ with the same milage and spec.


http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2013...

any reasons he should not buy it?


i know 'if its too good to be true it is' and im starting to think this and so is he, but im also thinking damn good deal,

he has done a HPI text check and its come back clean, but when you chuck the reg into confused.com it does not recognise it..... and that has got him thinking something is dodgy about it.



anyone?

Krikkit

27,939 posts

212 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
No mention of service history, awful alloys, awful tints, extremely rusty drums. Smacks of a neglected barry car to me, cheap or not.

Ved

3,949 posts

206 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
1. Advert written by an idiot who...
2. modified the car like an idiot and...
3. no doubt looked after it like an idiot.

There are billions of these things left so shop around.

Slink

Original Poster:

2,947 posts

203 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
see, i did not notice the tints or rusty drums, but admit, did think that it might have been looked after better with a monkey owning it.




Edited by Slink on Sunday 22 September 22:58

webby23

536 posts

212 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
Rear n/s wing darker shade of silver than the rest of the car.

Personally I think it looks terrible, nothing nice about it !!

Butter Face

35,100 posts

191 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
Advert written by a complete imbecile.


That's pretty much enough to put me off.

SonicShadow

2,452 posts

185 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
No mention of service history, awful alloys, awful tints, extremely rusty drums. Smacks of a neglected barry car to me, cheap or not.
AFAIK, all VVTLi 190's had disks all round. If that is indeed the case, then this car is the base 140bhp car.

Megaflow

11,622 posts

256 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
1) God awful wheels
2) God awful tints
3) Damaged rear bumper
4) Damaged front bumper & wing
5) Strange lights on front bumper, don't recall seeing them on a Celica before. Import?
6) Badly written advert with no mention of service history

That about covers it. If I was in the market for a Celica, I'd have spent about as long looking at the advert as I did to get the above details and movers on.

A golden rule somebody once old me, if there is something about a car that makes you suspicious and unsure, then walk away...

Grahamr123

209 posts

178 months

Sunday 22nd September 2013
quotequote all
That is not the VVTLI. If you look carefully you can see it redlines at 7k. I have the VVTLI I it goes up to 9K on the dial.

Not to mention the rather poor condition, silly alloys, window tint and what looks like an aftermarket spoiler.

Also, the 'T sport' spec started 03 onwards. It was VVTI-190 before that. This car is neither of them, its the 140bhp version.

Edited by Grahamr123 on Sunday 22 September 23:37

Sir Bagalot

7,109 posts

212 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
Does that drivers seat look 59,000 miles old......

Paul O

3,174 posts

214 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
Is it an import or something? What's with the indicators in the bumper?

SonicShadow

2,452 posts

185 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
Paul O said:
Is it an import or something? What's with the indicators in the bumper?
Well spotted, that is an import front bumper.

mini1380cc

2,949 posts

202 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
2002 on a W plate eh. As its an import the auto-trader data will be inaccurate. Its a 140BHP.....probably with a knocking bottom end.

santona1937

874 posts

161 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
Its not an '02
You buy a car with wheels like that at your peril
Wrong interior for the money-
would not touch it with a barge pole- this coming from someone who purchased the SOTW dedra with chavved wheels smile

LuS1fer

43,552 posts

276 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
...and you can buy a 140hp one for half that again...
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Toyota-Celica-1-8-VVT-i-...

Chris_VRS

2,466 posts

224 months

Monday 23rd September 2013
quotequote all
That is a whole heap of nasty!

All correct & valid pointers above, definately an import due to the marker lamps in the bumpers.
Base spec 140bhp - no leather, digital climate.

There's no way that drivers seat has done 'only' 59,000 miles!

Genuine T-Sports are from 2003 and have front skirt, side skirts & rear spoiler, T-Sport wheels, 2-tone full leather interior, climate and no sunroof.
A 190 with the dynamic pack would be a cheaper option no doubt.

A standard unabused, messed about with car has got to be the sensible purchasing option, although I'm sure those examples are quite rare nowadays!

Happy hunting.