Could you live with an ugly car.
Could you live with an ugly car.
Author
Discussion

Tannedbaldhead

Original Poster:

3,213 posts

162 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
A favourite topic of discussion between my ex-wife and I was whether if we lived in a street with modern, spacious, well appointed, warm and comfortable houses looking onto the most beautiful, picturesque but less pleasant to live in cottages where would we rather live. I went for the ugly house with the nice view, my wife opted for life in the pretty option.

I can think of the motoring equivelent. I regularly accompany staff as a passenger in cars owned by themselve's but financed by company travel expenses. A car that particularly impressed me was in a Renault Laguna GT 180 Estate. Trust me, the exterior is as unappealing in the metal as it is in pictures but the interior trim and furniture make it a very nice place to be and in addition the car was very very quick, handled and rode well.

The time I spent in the car was a very positive experience indeed. So positive, in fact, I had a wee sniff around Autotrader and was very pleasantly surprised at just how cheap I could pic up a nearly new Estate version when the time comes to replace my trusty old Merc.
One problem, pretty it ain't. Not sure I could live with an ugly car. Could you?

Dave_

530 posts

234 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
I want to say if it was awesome inside and a great drive i could but i would be lying.

How often do you park, walk away and look over your shoulder just to make sure it still looks good?

RocketScience

6,128 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Tannedbaldhead said:
...Laguna GT 180 Estate ...the car was very very quick
I had a quick look on Autotrader and their specs for a Renault Laguna 2.0 dCi 180 Dynamique 5Dr Estate suggest
0-62 mph in 8.5 seconds.

Were you talking about a different, quick version? wobble

tbc

3,017 posts

205 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Depends what you mean by ugly. Most cars will have design cues people find ugly or naff.

But cars are so cheap compared to 20-30 years ago so even with a few grand you can get handsome cars.

fjord

2,143 posts

167 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
I'd rather have a big ugly car than a small good looking one. fking hate hatchbacks.

whytheory

757 posts

176 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
RocketScience said:
I had a quick look on Autotrader and their specs for a Renault Laguna 2.0 dCi 180 Dynamique 5Dr Estate suggest
0-62 mph in 8.5 seconds.

Were you talking about a different, quick version? wobble
That's surprisingly slow for the power, guess it's a big old thing though. Still I'm sure that low down diesel torque makes it feel quite swift.

Anyway I reckon the facelift looks a bit more agreeable, but with a car like that I'd be getting pretty bored regardless, need something for the weekend too! An MG TF would do nicely.

Facelift;

Legacywr

15,826 posts

218 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Would a M135i drive so well you could overlook its ugliness? I don't know?

Heathwood

3,036 posts

232 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Well I've got a 130i which most people seem to find unattractive, so I guess the answers yes.

MissChief

8,001 posts

198 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Yes. I had a Multipla for about three years. Fantastically practical thing and even the looks grow on you eventually.

BeeGeeTee

15,169 posts

264 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
E60 5 series here so yes I can live with ugly!

My Mini Cooper is the pretty one smile

carinaman

25,277 posts

202 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
MissChief said:
Yes. I had a Multipla for about three years. Fantastically practical thing and even the looks grow on you eventually.
I've always liked the look of them. That Facelift they did on the Multipla was criminal.

rsv696

474 posts

173 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
I've got a fugly Peugeot camper van (swapped my VW T5 camper for it). It's brilliant for camping & has been 100% reliable, but I can't help feeling I should've got a facelifted T5 instead - soooo much nicer to look at.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

228 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Yes. Current toy is an Evo - looks like it was designed by a 12 year old boy. Previous was a westy - aesthetically it wasn't designed.

Both go well enough to overlook their aesthetics.

skyrover

12,700 posts

234 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
No, have to look at it every time I walked out the door.

Not a fan of "pretty" car's either.

I prefer "purposeful"

speedster986

269 posts

236 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Back in the 90's my dad had a Ford Scorpio with the Cosworth engine over more conventional but slower BMW and Mercedes. Horrifically ugly but a great engine.

AC43

13,667 posts

238 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Yeah I could do fugly. Would always favour oily bits over looks.

Wouldn't do do it the other way. I have an insurance courtesy car sitting outside - a Mercedes E250 CDI Sport. Looks great in black/black with 18's and other "AMG" bits. Purposeful outside, vault-like and cossetting inside. But powered by the most infernally noisy four pot banger possible Shuddering juddering, bellowing, groaning, roaring thing. Sounds (and feels) like some sort of industrial compressor at idle and then gets monumentally worse.

If I had a choice I'd have have taken the (mush slower) E 200 pertol and would happily lose the Sports trim. Just to get back to the hushed experience that a Merc should offer.

So, yes,function over form for me.


General Zod

334 posts

161 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
Function should trump form for someone who is into driving. Trying to think back to some older examples: Clio Williams, 205 GTI, Lotus Elise, Lotus Carlton- did the looks ever really matter? I don't remember them ever being discussed- it wasn't the point. They looked how they looked and that was that. This obsession with looks that some posters display, particularly in relation to the M135i, is weird to me. The focus seems in many cases to be more based on "what the Jones's will think" than the finer points of the car. I guess that's why Audi is doing so well.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

226 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
I opened the curtains to this beauty this morning;


In all honesty it's a demo for the wife, and though we wouldn't have that colour and those wheels it is a surprisingly good car. I am a bit embarrassed to think folk might assume I've bought it in that spec though, but will a blinged up one look any better?

New POD

3,851 posts

180 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
carinaman said:
MissChief said:
Yes. I had a Multipla for about three years. Fantastically practical thing and even the looks grow on you eventually.
I've always liked the look of them. That Facelift they did on the Multipla was criminal.
I once bet someone that There was an owners club for every car, and if he could name one car, and if there wasn't an owners club I'd pay him £10.

Thank you to the "Butt Ugly Owners Club" And your annual Butt ugly Ball at Billing.

The idea that there are people fitting the 5 cylinder 20 V 2.4 VNT Turbo alfa to a multipla is quite amusing. 200 BHp and Black smoke. Cooooooool.

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

233 months

Saturday 28th September 2013
quotequote all
No chance, I couldn't live with an ugly car, for me a major part of ownership is looking at it and thinking WOW!

You'd be a pretty sad person to not want good looks in a car.