Discussion
I am involved in the Dyno industry.
Even in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
Even in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
AW111 said:
I am involved in the Dyno industry.
Even in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
on a dynoEven in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
do they need a unit for a speed of 0 ?
357RS said:
In the Dyno industry I'd expect you to know that ftlb is not a unit of torque.
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make there. Foot pound is definitely a unit of torque, do you just not like how he wrote his abbreviation?That's to say, were you being a spelling pedant, or are you saying that foot pounds is not a measure of torque?
NorthernBoy said:
357RS said:
In the Dyno industry I'd expect you to know that ftlb is not a unit of torque.
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make there. Foot pound is definitely a unit of torque, do you just not like how he wrote his abbreviation?That's to say, were you being a spelling pedant, or are you saying that foot pounds is not a measure of torque?
Harking back to my student days then, if I recall correctly, the term ft/lb is used as a measure of work and lb/ft a measure of torque. Although I do recall that the two are quite often, and acceptably, interchangeable as a measure of torque. Look up any industry accepted torque table to establish that. I suppose that a pedant of the nth degree may find that somewhat unpalatable. 


Ah well, back to sleep now.



Ah well, back to sleep now. xyyman said:
Harking back to my student days then, if I recall correctly, the term ft/lb is used as a measure of work and lb/ft a measure of torque.
You memory is playing tricks, then. It can never be feet per pound, or pounds per feet the way you have indicated. One is multiplied by the other, not divided.AW111 said:
I am involved in the Dyno industry.
Even in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
Air in C but Exhaust in F? fEven in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
k them.Also PS is metric horsepower.
GroundEffect said:
Air in C but Exhaust in F? f
k them.
Also PS is metric horsepower.
I think people want exhaust in F because of all the US data.
k them.Also PS is metric horsepower.
Horsepower :
1 imperial (mechanical) horsepower is 745.7 watts.
1 ps (metric) horsepower is 735.5 watts.
Figures from t'internet, because I am not at work, but they seem right.
http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/do...
So kids, always quote your power in ps, because you get a bigger number (about 1% higher) !
Use "boiler horsepower" if you really want to confuse people.
AW111 said:
GroundEffect said:
Air in C but Exhaust in F? f
k them.
Also PS is metric horsepower.
I think people want exhaust in F because of all the US data.
k them.Also PS is metric horsepower.
Horsepower :
1 imperial (mechanical) horsepower is 745.7 watts.
1 ps (metric) horsepower is 735.5 watts.
Figures from t'internet, because I am not at work, but they seem right.
http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/do...
So kids, always quote your power in ps, because you get a bigger number (about 1% higher) !
Use "boiler horsepower" if you really want to confuse people.
littleredrooster said:
Negative Creep said:
I can't understand why wheels are measures in inches but tyre diameter is always in millimetres?
It isn't. It's the width which is metric, not the diameter. Unless you have a BMW with metric rims, in which case they're all metric.
Negative Creep said:
littleredrooster said:
Negative Creep said:
I can't understand why wheels are measures in inches but tyre diameter is always in millimetres?
It isn't. It's the width which is metric, not the diameter. Unless you have a BMW with metric rims, in which case they're all metric.
Radical make their cars with a mix of imperial and metric bolts! Working for an American company in the UK in engineering makes inter continental communication fun (I too am in engine testing with dynos but I develop the engines before they're fitted). They use a very eclectic mix of units, particularly temperatures
AW111 said:
I am involved in the Dyno industry.
Even in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
I feel your pain, the global measurement system is a big mess. Even in Australia, where we are notionally metric, people want
Boost - PSI
Manifold vacuum - Inches (of mercury)
Power - kW or Hp
Torque - ftlb or Nm
Speed - kph
Air temperature - degrees C
Exhaust temperature - degrees F
Bikes want power in ps (hp), but torque in kgm!
????
I was recently quoted some power figures from a chap in Norway, they use BHP and NM on their engine dynos.
We've been Metric since 1971, but still use a mish mash of both. I have no idea what 'a thou' is, any engineer over the age of 45ish will take a metric measurement and convert it to imperial.
There should have been a complete ban on imperial at a certain point in time, trying to change it gradually over so many years has resulted in lots of problems and massive expense.
The Meercans don't have any idea what metric is at all, but then that's no surprise, most of them don't even realise there is anything beyond the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans....
In my industry (indoor plants), many plant pots are given product names based on the range name, then the size.
So for example a basic round pot 45cm in diameter and 40cm deep is called a R45/40.
A few years ago we bought another company and found that in all their paperwork the code was based on the diameter in inches, but the height in centimetres, e.g. the example I gave would be a R18/40.
Even for a family firm of crazy religious people, that was pretty strange.
So for example a basic round pot 45cm in diameter and 40cm deep is called a R45/40.
A few years ago we bought another company and found that in all their paperwork the code was based on the diameter in inches, but the height in centimetres, e.g. the example I gave would be a R18/40.
Even for a family firm of crazy religious people, that was pretty strange.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




