Built in Sat Nav
Author
Discussion

jimmy156

Original Poster:

3,834 posts

217 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I have just read the new arrival evo fast fleet article for the Peugeot 208 Gti

The built in sat Nav is a £650 option which is daylight robbery anyway, but you can't enter a full postcode! What on earth are Peugeot playing at. My £99 tom tom from 8 years ago has full postcode recognition! Unbelievable!

Why would anyone spec that option?

/rant

  1. coolstorybro
Etc

Rickyy

6,618 posts

249 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Had use of a Nissan Navara a few years ago that had a similar system! Was bloody awful, wasn't touch screen either!

Countdown

49,519 posts

226 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
This is something I've always wondered - why do factory fitted satnav cost so much when aftermarket units are significantly cheaper and usually better?

a11y_m

1,861 posts

252 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Aye, the sat nav in my 2007 BMW is the same - can't enter full postcode. Effing useless. But the sat nav is still a reasonably desirable option to have for some reason, despite costing the original owner ££££££.

I much prefer the £99 TomTom One I use in my van.

valiant

14,239 posts

190 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I think Renault have a good solution (especially on the Megane - not sure if they do it in other models).

They simply put a TomTom in a TomTom shaped hole in the dash and don't charge silly money for it either.

KTF

10,689 posts

180 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Countdown said:
why do factory fitted satnav cost so much
Because they can.

Blib

48,152 posts

227 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I use the Sat Nav screen of my 2006 QP as a handy place to stick my TomTom holder to. The car's one only has postcodes for CENTRAL London.

scarble

5,277 posts

187 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Had the pleasure of a Seat built in sat-nav not too long ago.
It were s**te, I ended up the wrong end of Bradford, parked up in one of these streets where half the houses are boarded up and the other half knocked down as I got my phone set up so's I could find my way to the hotel rolleyes

Ed.

2,176 posts

268 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Not many countries have 7 digit post codes so are not a priority.

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
It baffles me why people bother with manufacturer sat navs. Buy an Android phone & a dashboard mount, you can have near-worldwide coverage based on Google Maps, never fails to find a destination and you never need to spend £70+ on updates. Significantly better than any Garmin or TomTom that I've owned and an order of magnitude better than any built-in system.

Blib

48,152 posts

227 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
The only plausible argument I've heard in favour of optioning Sat Nav is for resale residuals.

Matt UK

18,084 posts

230 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I was surprised thar my Jaguar XJ had 7-digit postcode. It looked like an Amstrad from the 80's, but was a good system and never let me down.

Built in nav though it not something I desire in a used car.

aspirated

2,540 posts

176 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
scarble said:
I ended up the wrong end of Bradford
Every end of Bradford is the wrong end of Bradford roflrofl

-Z-

8,358 posts

236 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Merc have a damn good solution for the A,B and C Class. Our C Class came with no sat nav. In the glovebox however is a dock designed to accept one of these:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Genuine-Becker-Navigation-...

A £250 (off eBay) sat nav module that just slots in and integrates with the screen, idrive controller thing and both built displays.

Actual satnav is very good with full postcode, traffic, speed camera database etc

billzeebub

3,912 posts

229 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
I always prefer not to have a built-in Sat Nav system. One more thing to go wrong. The TomTom/Garmin aftermarket/stand alone units are usually much better anyway, not to mention significantly cheaper.

SidJames

1,399 posts

263 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Symbolica said:
It baffles me why people bother with manufacturer sat navs. Buy an Android phone & a dashboard mount, you can have near-worldwide coverage based on Google Maps, never fails to find a destination and you never need to spend £70+ on updates. Significantly better than any Garmin or TomTom that I've owned and an order of magnitude better than any built-in system.
please see this thread in Sat Nav section. ;-)

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

HTP99

25,319 posts

170 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Ed. said:
Not many countries have 7 digit post codes so are not a priority.
I was told exactly this on a UK Renault launch a few years ago, when I asked the question about sat navs not taking the full UK postcode, obviously this was before Renault offered the inbuilt TomTom.

Deerfoot

5,252 posts

214 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
KTF said:
Countdown said:
why do factory fitted satnav cost so much
Because the customers continue to stump up for them.
EFA

hyperblue

2,912 posts

210 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
My Mk7 Golf came with a built in Sat Nav as standard. Probably not as good as the TomTom I already have, but nice not having to stick it on the wind screen every time and it's integrated with the instrument display and in car audio too.

Doubt I'd spec it if it were an option though!

chunoo

1,183 posts

265 months

Saturday 7th December 2013
quotequote all
Yes, I think they question shouldn't be "what are peugoet playing at", but what are the silly buggers playing at who actually choose it.

If you could charge 6x the value of something that only done half the job, but still sold well, then wouldn't you? It's how car companies make most of their profit.