RE: New Mercedes C-Class: official
RE: New Mercedes C-Class: official
Monday 16th December 2013

New Mercedes C-Class: official

Lighter, quicker and smarter than before, can the C-Class get one over on the 3 Series?



Mercedes Benz's recent product strategy was probably termed 'diversification' by the marketing people. But after the 360hp A-Class, another four-door saloon coupe and the GLA, it's returning to the bread and butter products with the new C-Class.

S-Class influence clear from outside...
S-Class influence clear from outside...
Looks like an S-Class, doesn't it? The latest 'sensual clarity' design language of Mercedes has now made its way to the smallest saloon, giving it a very mature look. The silver car seen here, most likely an 'Engineered by AMG' or similar, has hints of the CLA in its design also. There's nothing particularly surprising about the looks but it's cohesive and recognisably Mercedes. Probably quite sensitive to spec choice though.

This C-Class is larger than the last but also 100kg lighter too thanks to more aluminium in the body. An increase in overall length of 95mm comes predominantly through the 80mm longer wheelbase (now 2,840mm). Width is up 40mm too, and boot capacity is now at 480 litres.

That's all well and good for passengers, but what about the driver? Well the S-Class influence extends to the cabin also, with the new Comand controller and switchgear familiar. Mercedes is promising great interior refinement too, aided by a drag co-efficient as low as 0.24Cd.

... and inside too!
... and inside too!
From launch, there will be three engines. The 1.6-litre C180 makes 156hp and 184lb ft, enough for 62mph in 8.2 seconds plus 56.5mpg and 116g/km. The 184hp C200 is the second petrol option initially.

Of course in Britain the most popular C-Classes will be the diesels. The C220 Bluetec will fight for company car kudos with the 320d, and goes into battle slightly down on power (170hp plays 184) but ahead on those vital efficiency stats (103g/km and 70.6mpg against 120g/km and 61.4mpg).

Engines due to join the range later include are unsurprisingly focused on diesel; more powerful variants of the 2.2 will be offered, a 1.6 will be introduced and a diesel-electric C300 Bluetec hybrid promises 72mpg. A plug-in petrol hybrid will arrive eventually as well.

New C-Class 100kg lighter than old car
New C-Class 100kg lighter than old car
With configurability and individualisation key new car buzzwords right now, there are plenty of dynamic options to bemuse the prospective C-Class buyer. All models come as standard on steel springs, with three 'direct control' set-ups on the extras list. As well as a comfort and 15mm lower sports suspension, Mercedes will offer a 'lowered comfort suspension with a sportier character'. Overkill perhaps? Just in case that wasn't sufficient choice, the C-Class will be the first compact exec to have optional air suspension.

Mercifully, there's just the one steering option, an electromechanical 'Direct Steer' system with variable assistance and ratio. An 'agility select' switch allows the driver to toggle between Comfort, Eco, Sport, Sport+ and Individual modes for the car.

When's the AMG coming then?
When's the AMG coming then?
In case that all proves a little too distracting, a comprehensive roster of Mercedes 'Intelligent Drive' active safety kit features. As in the S-Class, there's a feast of of 'Assist' equipment for when the driver may find themselves gawping at the Comand screen (now 960x540 pixels and up to 8.4-inches FYI) rather than the road. There's Attention Assist, Collision Prevention Assist, Enhanced Active Lane Keeping Assist, Active Parking Assist... The list really does go on!

Bizarrely given how keen Mercedes appears to remove all responsibility from the driver, the new C-Class will still be available with a six-speed manual if desired. Of course Mercedes' seven-speed auto will be specced in the majority of cases, now further refined for its latest installation.

The C-Class will debut at Geneva, with UK pricing and spec to be announced in due course.

 









Author
Discussion

drocter81

Original Poster:

311 posts

228 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
definitely better proportioned than CLA

deltashad

6,731 posts

219 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Better proportioned to the CLA yes, but too similar.

I like the overall look, not sure about the melted front end they seem to have adopted, the interior is very nice, I like the sweeping dash, steering wheel looks too fussy.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

270 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Progress all round until you get to the back end... all a bit droopy-Bentley-esque for me...but the rest looks suitably smart.

loudlashadjuster

5,997 posts

206 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Looks OK outside, will reserve final judgement until I see one in the flesh.

Tacked-on screen = no dice though. Awful.

Chris_VRS

2,332 posts

215 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Agree with the comments above in that it is much better resolved than the CLA & did the designers have a half day when they came to signing off the rear end?!...

Interior looks rather nice & appears to have a better layout than the equivalent 3-series.

Not keen on the integrated tailpipes and the faux diffuser either having had a second look!

TWPC

899 posts

183 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Marketing departments drive me mad. There is excellent news in here hidden by the usual guff.

  • 100kg lighter than before - huge achievement that benefits all buyers, whether PH-er or the buyer with no interest in the car - please market more heavily!
  • Manual gearbox still available - hooray!
Then the guff:
"The latest 'sensual clarity' design language of Mercedes has now made its way to the smallest saloon, giving it a very mature look." Where do they find these phrases? Just say that within time and money constraints your stylists did the best they could. To my eyes this current style of Mercedes nose, with the very visible panel gap at the leading edge of the bonnet, makes it look like the grill is detachable or has been added on as an after-thought. Sometimes I think it looks like it has had a broken nose or maybe some surgery done: not a good look. Bring back the old upright grill with the gunsight.
All the electronics rubbish - OMG, talk about overkill, surely just there to raise profit margins - and all the suspension options you can pay extra for; can we really be confident they have tried as hard as they can to engineer the basic steel suspension properly when they really want us to pay for the 'upgrade'.

I realise I am being inconsistent (I always think more choice is better, hence happiness at the ongoing availability of the manual gearbox) in moaning about the emphasis on all the irrelevant options, but this is a typical pre-launch article and the car companies rarely focus on the important stuff.
And as for 'configurability and individualisation' being key buzz words, why don't they just say that they are now able to offer more options than ever before, especially on the electronics side? This ain't new.

What I'd love to see is a Dacia marketeer let loose in a car co. with the resources of a BMW or a Mercedes. Imagine what they could do if they tried to offer the best possible car for the least money while still making a profit but cut out all the superfluous cr@p...

Tim16V

421 posts

204 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
I was going to chop my Mrs' C Class Sport in for a Golf GTi when the balloon payment is due in a few months time, but I'm not so sure now. That looks really good and the 100kg weight saving superb.

FWDRacer

3,565 posts

246 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Rear 3/4 view is really awkward. Don't think they'll be bottling it in Munich or Inglestadt TBH.

Will look great in hearing aid beige as a Schwabisch Taxi hehe

mc_blue

2,548 posts

240 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Is it just me who thinks it looks exactly the same as the new S-Class?





I appreciate cars in the same range look similar but even down to the wing mirrors and headlight shape - I'd struggle to tell these apart.

loudlashadjuster

5,997 posts

206 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
mc_blue said:
Is it just me who thinks it looks exactly the same as the new S-Class?
Third sentence in the article said:
Looks like an S-Class, doesn't it?

Agoogy

7,274 posts

270 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
That is shocking! I can't tell the difference, based on those photos (nothing to scale them) I just don't know...that is NOT progress...

E30M3SE

8,483 posts

218 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Will reserve final judgement until I see one in the metal, but I think I prefer the look of the W204.

dxg

9,977 posts

282 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all


^^

I love that - not the electronics gubbins, but the interplay of the materials.

The matt aluminium finish coupled with the leather (think texture); and the interface of the slightly raised chrome with veneer (again, think texture). Then there's the change of the veneer to a facsimile of ply layers to give the impression that it's a real piece of thick ply. And also the fine grained knurling on the touch points of the knob and the rotary wheels.

The tactility of this - let's face it, part of the car that you do not want to be looking at as you interact with it - is just lovely.

Yes, it will be painted plastic rather than metal and the timber will likely be a laminate, but there's a certain /consideration/ that's at play there, and its rather nice.

Edited by dxg on Monday 16th December 10:29

G0ldfysh

3,317 posts

279 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
loudlashadjuster said:
S = C concern
As more people are likely to buy a C Class than an S I would think Merc will do well from this.
With the Halo effect much stronger if there is a strong family bond.

BeirutTaxi

6,634 posts

236 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Shows the 3 Series up in terms of asthetics.

The current shape C Class was reputed as a cracking drive, although I suspect the BMW fans will want to deny that.

stumpage

2,189 posts

248 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Outside - Nice, Inside - Nice, Stupid stuck on screen - What were they thinking!!


CraigyMc

18,078 posts

258 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
article said:
Of course in Britain the most popular C-Classes will be the diesels. The C220 Bluetec will fight for company car kudos with the 320d, and goes into battle slightly down on power (170hp plays 184) but ahead on those vital efficiency stats (103g/km and 70.6mpg against 120g/km and 61.4mpg).
I'd have said the 320d EfficientDynamics was a more natural rival for the Bluetec. That would be 163ps, 109g CO2/km and 68.9mpg.

It's sort of annoying that BMW have two 320d models with different power outputs, but they do...

sinbad666

184 posts

230 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
Not a huge fan of the looks, particularly the back end.

Twoshoe

966 posts

206 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
stumpage said:
Stupid stuck on screen - What were they thinking!!
Quite. A target for ne'er-do-wells everywhere I would have thought.

Bill Carr

2,234 posts

256 months

Monday 16th December 2013
quotequote all
dxg said:


^^

I love that - not the electronics gubbins, but the interplay of the materials.

The matt aluminium finish coupled with the leather (think texture); and the interface of the slightly raised chrome with veneer (again, think texture). Then there's the change of the veneer to a facsimile of ply layers to give the impression that it's a real piece of thick ply. And also the fine grained knurling on the touch points of the knob and the rotary wheels.

The tactility of this - let's face it, part of the car that you do not want to be looking at as you interact with it - is just lovely.

Yes, it will be painted plastic rather than metal and the timber will likely be a laminate, but there's a certain /consideration/ that's at play there, and its rather nice.

Edited by dxg on Monday 16th December 10:29
Agreed, that's rather lovely. I'm not the kind of chap who usually cares about that sort of thing but I can appreciate the effort and thought that's gone in to that.

Performance and economy stats for the 1.6 C180 are impressive! Apologies if I missed it, but is that engine N/A? For most average people that's probably all the engine they'll ever need.