RE: Jaguar F-Type vs. Mercedes SLK55 AMG
RE: Jaguar F-Type vs. Mercedes SLK55 AMG
Monday 30th December 2013

Jaguar F-Type vs. Mercedes SLK55 AMG

V8 AMG SLK for same money as entry level F-Type? Beauty, meet beast...



Hands up, we're a little late to driving the F-Type in Britain. The launch proved it most certainly met the lofty expectations levelled at it, but how would it fare in a wet and cold December rather than a balmy April?

To find out, the Jaguar needed a rival that hadn't been encountered previously. A tough challenge given that it has faced everything from a Boxster to an R8 in its various forms elsewhere. We've avoided the obvious Porsche rivals for now (F-Type Coupe vs. Cayman S is surely one to look forward to in 2014 though) and instead got an AMG.

Despite fairly reserved appearances for an Affalterbach product, the SLK55 comes into this battle packing a punch. It's 80hp and 66lb ft up on the Jaguar, enough to offset its weight disadvantage. Our first drive back in 2011 concluded that it was 'a very well-rounded product'. Again though, that was overseas in blazing sunshine; we all know how some favourable weather and a dropped roof can favourably enhance impressions.

As with every F-Type comparison, the opponents call into question the Jaguar's price. Can its supercharged V6 really compete with a bonafide AMG V8 available for the same money? The Merc of course comes with a folding hard top and the Jag makes do with a canvas roof; how big a difference will that make? What is the best of these two is the best way to spend £60K? Read on...


Introduction and comments
Jaguar F-Type
Mercedes SLK55 AMG
Verdict



JAGUAR F-TYPE V6
Engine:
2,995cc supercharged V6
Transmission: 8-speed automatic
Power (hp): 340@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@3,500-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 5.3 seconds
Top speed: 161mph (limited)
Kerb weight: 1,597kg
MPG: 31.4 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 209g/km
Price: £58,500




MERCEDES-BENZ SLK55 AMG
Engine:
5,461cc V8
Transmission: 7-speed automatic
Power (hp): 421@6,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 398@4,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.6 seconds
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
Kerb weight: 1,690kg
MPG: 33.6 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 195g/km
Price: £55,335

All prices before options


Photos: PrimeExposures

Author
Discussion

Adrian250

Original Poster:

167 posts

157 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I would take the F-Type every time. The Merc looks old, and the ride on the Jag would undoubtedly better far superior. Fuel economy would play a part in the decision as well! And if its noise you are after, then spec the sports exhaust on the Jag - TRULY EPIC!

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

181 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I thought that the harsh ride on the F Type was a negative, hence the revised spring rates in the coupe?

Also, looking at the stats regarding power, torque, consumption and emissions, - the Germans realy are ahead of the rest on engine technology at the moment.

(I'll take the F Type in blue please)

xRIEx

8,180 posts

177 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
soad said:
Thought Jag had 375bhp? confused
V6 S is quoted at 380 I believe, the vanilla V6 is 340.

soad

34,652 posts

205 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
xRIEx said:
V6 S is quoted at 380 I believe, the vanilla V6 is 340.
You're right, I mistook it for the S model. getmecoat

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

242 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I do like the Merc and in general prefer German cars, but I love the F Type and would take it over any current offering from Mercedes/BMW etc.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I'd have the Mercedes.

shantybeater

1,202 posts

198 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
The front of that merc has really been beaten with an ugly stick. I'd go for the jag all day long

Matt UK

18,084 posts

229 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Great thread title - I agree though, "Jag every time" hehe

jakesmith

9,497 posts

200 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
The Merc has the power but that's it, it's not a good drive I was left disapointed by it. I didn't drive the Jag but really would only consider the V8 not the V6 if there is one in the lineup

kambites

71,473 posts

250 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Somehow 1600kg and an automatic gearbox just don't appeal in something claiming to be a sports car. That's the best part of 150kg more than a 911 which has two more seats (sort of)!

billzeebub

3,911 posts

228 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
without question the Jag

Ed Straker

221 posts

172 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
AMG - no contest.
The Jag - as indicated - felt totally contrived - and V A S T
Far too wide.

Sunny winter day with the roof off, airscarf on and N.A. V8 dominating the SLK's so-called "flaws?"
Yes please.

weez123

101 posts

171 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
His & hers

TREMAiNE

4,164 posts

178 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
I'd take the AMG.

The Jag is nice - but it just doesn't excite me as much as the SL.

Patrick Bateman

13,172 posts

203 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Jag trounces the Merc.

NelsonR32

1,777 posts

200 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Jaguar all day.

richs2891

906 posts

282 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
If I was buying with my own money then the Merc, if it was leased then the Jag.

Richard

goldblum

10,272 posts

196 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
AMG V8 for me.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

177 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
richs2891 said:
If I was buying with my own money then the Merc, if it was leased then the Jag.

Richard
I don't understand that, does someone else give you the money when you lease a car?

redroadster

1,886 posts

261 months

Monday 30th December 2013
quotequote all
Jag looks better by far if they can sell them at this price goodluck to them ,i personally feel its way overpriced but theres one born every minute.....