Shed of the Week: Alfa 166 Twin Spark
Shed kicks off 2014 with an apparently unwanted big Alfa

The ad for this Sevenoaks-based Alfa 166 is a fine example. In a remarkably short selection of words it manages to contain the full gamut of dreaded phrases. And for the benefit of those who are hard of hearing, or comprehension, the vendor has kindly put his 'SOLD AS SEEN' warning in capital letters.
It's almost as if he doesn't want to sell it. Hmm... maybe he wants to KEEP IT FOR HIMSELF. It seems more likely however that he thinks he knows something, i.e. that big Alfas are about as practical and sensible a form of everyday transport as a Mars rover.
But is this fair? The last 166 we Shedded, a 3.0-litre V6 in November '12, attracted a lot of PH love. One PHer described the Italian 5 Series challenger as the motoring equivalent of a Gucci suit. This is the pre-'03 non-facelifted model, wearing a front end only a mother could love, so is perhaps more like the equivalent of a three-piece Gucci suit. In light brown. On the positive side it does have a smart set of teledial wheels and a nice body colour/leather combo.
Plus it has the potentially less ruinous 2.0-litre four-pot Twin Spark motor. Just the job for these straitened times, you'd think. Trouble is, we're talking here about the days before super-efficient petrol engines. Some would say that the otherwise game TS motor was a bit overmatched in that 166 body. Others would be less kind and compare the performance of a Twin Spark 166 to that of a pogo stick with metal fatigue. It only just scrapes into single figures for the 0-60 dash, and will punish those of a sporting bent and/or a heavy right foot by delivering equally depressing mpg figures. Big engines in small cars are good; small engines in big cars are not so good. Although having said that, a 166 owner commenting on that Nov '12 Shed reckoned that driving his 2.0 car made him feel like a king. Takes all sorts.
Indeed, it's not that bad. The lighter weight of the four-pot gives it slightly nimbler handling than the nose-heavy V6, and there are many (including Shed) who believe that the 166 looks better in reality than it does in photos. The photos of this one do make it look rather tempting. Shed would be inclined to use the ad as a buying tool. After all, if the car is as risky as the vendor seems to be implying it is, then surely you'd be doing him a favour by taking it off his hands for 700 quid.
The apparent absence of a service history is both a risk and an opportunity, depending on who's holding the V5. All you can do is avoid dealer servicing and keep your eye on the suspension bushes and chocolate wishbones, the mass air flow sensor, and any signs of a plastic-impeller water pump.
If you get lucky, buying this car and keeping hold of it could be a rewarding leap of faith. For your x hundred bid you'd be getting a very comfortable and stylish cruiser, and maybe even an appreciating asset. Our scientific 'how many left' comparo between the number of 166s running around in Nov '12 - about 1,300 - and the number that are about now indicates that over a hundred 166s have gone the way of all flesh between the third quarter of '12 and the same period in '13. We're now down to under a thousand all told. 166 production only finished about six years ago, so parts are still reasonably easy to find. Sure, some of the electrics will fail, but then even German cars have been known to have electrical problems.
Buying a big Alfa and keeping it. Why, the very idea.
Here's the ad. It starts promisingly with Blue and goes on from there.
A year or two back, a fellow member of a Jaguar Xj40 forum bought a 3 litre V6 166. He wrote that it didn't handle very well and felt cheap inside in comparison to his Sovereign, which tarnished the Alfa for me slightly. I assumed they would handle brilliantly. I still like them though, they're something different from the norm. They're not a bad old thing and a decent first Shed of the week for 2014.
I'll have that one for a bag of sand.
V6
Pre-2001 tax
V6
Red
V6
Cambelt/Water pump change
V6
I'll have that one for a bag of sand.
V6
Pre-2001 tax
V6
Red
V6
Cambelt/Water pump change
V6
interior is a little too easily scratched, poor legroom in back.
3.0V6 was lovely, but 240bhp was far too much for the front wheels - suspect 2.0TS handles better, my previous 164 TS was far sweeter in that respect.
Still miss mine. S628LJB where are you now ?
I think the trader is just making absolutely sure that once the deal is done, he wants no comeback. On balance, I think this is fair enough - these are not the last word in build quality, though seemed to be more niggly things than actually stranding you.
Nice you picked up my Gucci reference, the 166 is still a class looking act, when its modern contemporaries all look so lookie likie (not sure if its safety legislation stifling design or design in stagnation).
I still say if you're gonna have a 166 deffo get a 3.0 V6 for total sensory stimulus.
As a comparison.. As I now own a e39 530i (touring - if the 166 was available in an estate i would deffo have one, oh and yes I did consider a carrozzeria commission lol) i have to say that although the damping, body control and handling from the e39 is a lot better than a 166, it doesn't have quite the sense of occasion and in some areas (squeaks and rattles) the 166 is a better built car. Now that is something that i never would have thought I would be putting out there!
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







