How much power do well serviced higher mileage cars lose?
How much power do well serviced higher mileage cars lose?
Author
Discussion

E65Ross

Original Poster:

36,729 posts

242 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
We've all seen the top gear episodes when they buy absolute dogs of cars which have lost shed loads of power but in reality if cars are driven as normal (I know this varies from person to person!) and are serviced on time with the right oils, coolant etc etc how much power do you think they lose?

I also guess this changes from engine to engine? Maybe a wheezy 3 cylinder may be shagged by 150k yet a bit V12 won't be?

But then, whilst cruising bigger engines aren't working as hard do you find they're often driven harder because of the benefits and types of drivers who own them?

Out of curiosity I'm getting mine put on a rolling road next weekend, 333hp/328bhp as standard 109k miles ago... Be interesting to see what it makes these days!

aka_kerrly

12,505 posts

240 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
I don't really believe it is anywhere near as bad as TG make out.

In the past I've run a few high mileage engines on rolling roads and found that they have not lost power. Several mk2 Golf GTIs with 1.8 16v, 8v, VR6s, G60s have all made the factory power or more apart from on one occasion when my 198k 1.8 16v engine "only" managed 138.2hp instead of it's 139hp it left the factory with - shocking if you ask me. I really should have contacted VW Customer service!!

Luckily for VW after rebuilding the head with new exhaust valves, new guides, new stem seals an skimming 40thou off the engine went back together and made over 150hp and as far as I know the engine is still going - I sold it with close to 220k on it.

DervVW

2,223 posts

169 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Also I wonder when new they are actually producing that much... or they have to warm to it once worn in?

GuyWMD

1,117 posts

233 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Not exactly 'high' mileage, but I know that my E91 330d on 100k gave a 235.5bhp reading whilst strapped down to the rollers a few months ago.

So providing they've been properly maintained I can't see the power dropping off to the claimed levels on Top Gear.

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

228 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
If the tolerances within the engine are still within spec, it shouldn't lose much at all. Carbon deposits on intake valves and blocked/dirty intake filters will reduce power though.

The only things within the engine itself that will cause dramatic power losses are if the cams have worn badly, but they'll be on their way out if they have, and if the bores are so worn that there's a lot of 'blow-by', but you'll know about that too.

With good servicing, and good quality oil, you should see very little wear even well into triple figures. The last engine I stripped had 185,000 miles on the clock and still had very good cross-hatching marks on the bores, so was hardly worn at all.

I suspect Top Gear retarded those engines they tested for the sake of making a point.

E65Ross

Original Poster:

36,729 posts

242 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
GuyWMD said:
Not exactly 'high' mileage, but I know that my E91 330d on 100k gave a 235.5bhp reading whilst strapped down to the rollers a few months ago.

So providing they've been properly maintained I can't see the power dropping off to the claimed levels on Top Gear.
And what's it meant to give as standard? Interesting smile

bennyboysvuk

3,494 posts

278 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
GuyWMD said:
Not exactly 'high' mileage, but I know that my E91 330d on 100k gave a 235.5bhp reading whilst strapped down to the rollers a few months ago.

So providing they've been properly maintained I can't see the power dropping off to the claimed levels on Top Gear.
And what's it meant to give as standard? Interesting smile
227 bhp according to Parkers.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

190 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Does anyone take top garbage seriously???
Mind I suppose it's typical of most BBC output,,

zcacogp

11,239 posts

274 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
My 944 showed 218bhp on the Weltmeister rollers at 150k miles. Standard is 211, so that's a slight increase.


Oli.

Howard-

4,964 posts

232 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
It won't lose any power unless the engine is seriously worn out.

Mine dyno'd at 236bhp at about 103k.

sjc

16,436 posts

300 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Fifth gear did something on this last year.
Took 3 mega milers and dyno'd before and after a good service/fuel additives/points and plugs adjusting etc .IIRC one was a VR6 Scirocco. All three cars had a decent gain after tweaking and got very close to the original BHP figures.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

218 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Aren't the cars they Dyno on TG normally fked bangers?

As for reading too much into dyno figures compared to claimed factory outputs...

speedking31

3,931 posts

166 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Surely the manufacturers have to understate the (new) power output because there will be some statistical variation and they don't want half the buyers returning their new cars because they don't make the claimed power?

DubZeus

1,401 posts

248 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
My old Polo 16v(afh) was 100bhp from factory % rolling roaded with 104bhp at 120k miles

E65Ross

Original Poster:

36,729 posts

242 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
powerstroke said:
Does anyone take top garbage seriously???
Mind I suppose it's typical of most BBC output,,
No, that's why I mentioned that they're clearly shagged bangers and not "normal" cars, as such.

Interesting results posted above. Will be intrigued to see what the 745i makes next Saturday.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

218 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
speedking31 said:
...don't want half the buyers returning their new cars because they don't make the claimed power?
Because new car buyers rush to get them tested?

aka_kerrly

12,505 posts

240 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
Devil2575 said:
speedking31 said:
...don't want half the buyers returning their new cars because they don't make the claimed power?
Because new car buyers rush to get them tested?
My thought to but not just new cars, maybe we need a poll - have you ever put a car on a rolling road?

Trying to persuade the average motorist that servicing is a good idea is hard enough when a car "works" (as far as they are concerned) the thought of trying to convince them to use a dyno to ensure the engine is making maximum power is laughable.

GuyWMD

1,117 posts

233 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
E65Ross said:
And what's it meant to give as standard? Interesting smile
Not sure, for some reason I had a figure of 231 in my head.

It's completely standard btw! A garage I've used in the past had the RR fitted so whilst I was down for a catchup decided to see what figures it would pull out of interest really.

n90acc

126 posts

206 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
You have to then take into the account of 'how accurate is that particular dyno' as they can differ a fair bit.

A friend of mine went to a 306 gti-6 RR day and one turned up with 250k on the clock....totally bog standard and hit dead on factory power 167bhp!

carpetsoiler

1,960 posts

195 months

Friday 10th January 2014
quotequote all
1999 E36 328i, made 233bhp last rolling road. I think if the engine's well looked after, it'll continue to be strong.