How much BHP do you need ?
How much BHP do you need ?
Author
Discussion

poolyman

Original Poster:

21 posts

188 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Hi everyone. First post and all that. Anyway....

Seems to me that a lot of very ordinary cars have a lot of performance these days - certainly by the standards of my driving youth in the 80's when BHP was in much shorter supply. Some of the fun in those far off days seemed to be extracting maximum performance from vehicles that seemed reluctant to realise their hidden potential (my Mini Clubman was good at this). Often nowadays reviews will state that "you will have to use the gearbox to make adequate progress" and this in respect of small engined cars as well. Anyway, my point is - are we all becoming used to riding around on a wave of torque from our 2 litre TDi's, or is there the occasional punter out there that likes thrashing around the countryside in a smaller engined, less powerful car that requires a certain amount of thought and commitment to keep up to speed ?. I know that the last 150 mph plus capable car I had never saw anywhere near it's top speed (still only returned 25mpg though)and I find the C1 I have just bought as a runaround rather a lot of fun, although I must admit another 25BHP there would not go amiss at all.

anthonysjb

532 posts

165 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
can't beat blasting down country lanes in my 1275cc Mini.... glorious

crossy67

1,570 posts

208 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Most power I've ever owned all in one place at the same time was 340bhp. It was adequate biggrin More would have been nice but I didn't want the trade off in loss of reliability and drive-ability. Now if someone could make a car with more power that drove as nicely as that car I'd say 340bhp wasn't enough ;-)

kambites

71,478 posts

250 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Quite happy with my 160ish.

topless360

2,763 posts

247 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I had a 16 year old 1.5 Mitsibishi Colt as a courtesy car when having some work done on the 360. I must say, the car took me back to the days of a small engined car that needs to be driven well to make progress. It was a fun and cuckable little car, same can be said for a C1 I had as a courtesy car once.

That said, I did have an even bigger smile on my face when I got the Ferrari back, even if I don't drive it to anywhere near its full potential.

I think when you get used to any amount of power you want more, and that feeling of want can make one miserable, even if you have something powerful already.

Troubleatmill

10,210 posts

188 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
<500bhp is for pooftahs!


Actually James Hunt said the best fun he ever had was in his old Austin A30 van.
Probably around 30bhp.


I liked my >500bhp though. Problem was - Under 4 seconds and you are already breaking the limit. Give it another three seconds of the beans and you are breaking a ton.
There was nothing like it. But the fun was over far too quickly.

I like the idea of the underpowered skinny tyred lightweight crate though.





otolith

68,901 posts

233 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
How much mass have you got?

joema

2,754 posts

208 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Always more

vallance5

181 posts

167 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I think the E46 M3 was right in the sweet spot with 340 bhp. Much more and you start doing silly speeds in a matter of seconds. It was also nicely delivered and sounded great cloud9

yzrh

171 posts

151 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I kind of prefer torque & the ability to accelerate powerfully when you're already going at decent speed.

Would say about 200 bhp minimum.


MG CHRIS

9,322 posts

196 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
115bhp for me, don't need high bhp to have fun on the roads. My 1.6 mx5 is plenty fast enough for me and brilliant through the mountain roads around wales, rwd, lightweight, convertible a proper British sports car.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
40hp would do me I think. I made do with a sickly 130,000 mile fiesta that probably only had that much - it did the job.

kiethton

14,647 posts

209 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
For road driving its BHP/tonne thats the most important IMO (unless you love driving recovery lorries!

Anything above about 120bhp/tn+ is sufficient, although I feel a lot better with 180bhp/tn+

Edited by kiethton on Monday 10th February 21:28

MADRod

448 posts

263 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Not sure how much bhp i need. Have 3 cars & all will get me around & break the speed limit if I wish. To me its how much bhp do i want. I have a choice of 90bhp, 200bhp & 838bhp. Do most miles with 90bhp & its just fine, sunny days see me totally happy with 200bhp if im feeling crazy then 838 aint enough.

Fattyfat

3,310 posts

225 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
Always nice to have more but I've just spent the past 1000 miles in an ancient Pug 406 with the grand total of 90BHP (probably less TBH) and haven't felt short changed.

Censorious

15,169 posts

263 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I prefer a turbo diesel if the car has less bhp as you still get a useful slug of torque.

My current daily driver has just 90bhp but has so much more oomph than a 90bhp n/a petrol car I had a few years ago.

My most powerful car to date was just under 300bhp and that was a turbo petrol engine and was a good performer imho.

CB2152

1,555 posts

162 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
I quite like riding on the wave of torque from my 2.3 turbo petrol smile

I like pressing the throttle pedal and getting minimal rise in engine note, but a nice surge. I like watching the turbo gauge dance, and I like the ease with which I can cover ground. 250(ish) bhp. At the moment...

Wild Child

26 posts

158 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
After riding for years on bikes with more than 1200cc and 170hp my current bike is a 200hp 1441cc monster. I only bought it because there was no faster bike that I could buy.

Seeing that I can comfortaby ride it WFO (not all the time, mind...) without falling off and killing myself, I would say a 1000hp car would be just what I need. For the first few months at least... ;-)

Too much (power) is never enough...

david

Edited by Wild Child on Monday 10th February 21:34

Madkat

1,147 posts

201 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all
http://youtu.be/mBFjHjm0O5M

Does this video answer it again?

Wills2

29,653 posts

204 months

Monday 10th February 2014
quotequote all

More, I always wonder what the M3 would be like with 500hp if I had that I'd want 600 etc...