RE: Mercedes GLA45 AMG: Driven
RE: Mercedes GLA45 AMG: Driven
Thursday 20th February 2014

Mercedes GLA45 AMG: Driven

A-Class crossover gets the full AMG treatment; does it deliver?



Even in a world where apparently every nook and cranny of niche motoring is catered for, the Mercedes GLA45 AMG appears an odd one. It surely won't be bought for any off-road ability (indeed the standard GLA's off-road extras aren't available), plus it's heavier, thirstier and slower than the AMG A-Class. And yet it could be the better car. Here goes ...

Drives just like an A45. No, really
Drives just like an A45. No, really
For starters, and purely subjectively, it has more visual appeal than the A-Class. If the GLA had been badged along the lines of an A-Class Allroad or suchlike it would be entirely believable. It really doesn't sit an awful lot higher than the hatch which, combined with the AMG body addenda and (optional) 20-inch wheels, gives it some presence and stature lacking from the A45. Personally, the grey car on black wheels looked superb.

Those wheels dominate first impressions on the road too, but for entirely positive reasons. A GLA on 20s rides better than an A45 on 18s, at least on this testing. It's still firm but fractionally less so, attributable to the additional travel of the GLA's suspension and a slightly softer set-up. Dictated by its remit as the more family-oriented 45 AMG model, it actually offers a preferable dynamic experience.

Best of the rest?
That's because the tweaks are subtle, with no significant drawback when driving hard. That same eagerness, agility and ruthless composure that characterises the A45 has transferred across to the GLA near perfectly. Perhaps due to the heavier wheels it feels like there's some additional weight to the steering as well which is great for placing the fairly bluff nose. The GLA45 remains very nearly as engaging to drive fast as the A-Class but with an additional layer of refinement. Brilliant, right?

Looks better too. Maybe
Looks better too. Maybe
Sort of. Turbo lag was more evident than in the A45 and even when beyond 3,000rpm, it seemed to lack the A45's rabid acceleration. It wasn't until the last few hundred rpm that it ever felt 360hp. And this despite only weighing "around 40kg" more than the 1,555kg A-Class (there isn't an official kerbweight yet).

Even more confusingly, an ostensibly identical Edition 1 felt much keener from 2,500rpm onwards despite still being afflicted by a low-rev lethargy. The, erm, distinctive Edition 1 won't be offered in the UK but the individual options aside from the body kit (AMG Performance exhaust, suspension and wheels) will be.

Snap, crackle and pop
There was little discernable difference on the suspension despite the tweaked springs and dampers reputedly increasing overall stiffness by around 20 per cent. We'd save the cash there as the standard set-up feels great and instead plump for the exhaust; the regular GLA45 is actually a tad quieter and less raucous than the A/CLA. The performance exhaust adds a whole heap of extra snap, crackle and pop from behind should you wish. It could be a hard one to refuse...

Decent ride on 20s a surprise
Decent ride on 20s a surprise
For some perspective on the AMG's ability, a brief drive in the GLA200 CDI manual proved a lot. Of course there was the obvious performance difference, but 45's ride was actually more composed and consequently made it more relaxing on the motorway. The steering's greater sense of connection to the front wheels also became patently clear, the diesel's rim completely numb by contrast. Perhaps not a relevant comparison, but revealing all the same.

The roads used for the GLA launch were just glorious (Dream Drive coming soon, for sure) but they served to highlight (again) the frustrating delay in downchanges that can occur with the 7G-DCT Speedshift 'box. Charging through third gear into hairpins the brakes are great but just where second is needed to lend some engine braking the shift never materialises; the car trundles into the bend in third and the change nearly always comes too late. Sometimes it will drop a gear perfectly, but never frequently enough. The lag perhaps drew greater attention to the transmission's deficiencies too.

360hp turbo only has another 40kg to shift
360hp turbo only has another 40kg to shift
All your bases
But that shouldn't sound like concluding on the GLA45 negatively as it's a fantastic car. It offers all that is so enjoyable about the A45 (at least the Edition 1 car did) with an additional level of compliance and a little more practicality with no significant dynamic drawback.

There is a slight downer to finish on though. The GLA is expected to cost about £1,000 more than the equivalent A-Class, but that premium will be nearer £5K for the '45 AMG with a predicted price of £42-45,000 when it arrives in the UK this summer. From this experience, the GLA is preferable to the A-Class even if everything suggested it shouldn't be, but not by enough to warrant that sort of price. At closer to £40K it would be much closer to call but at much more it could price itself out of consideration, capable and likeable though it is.


MERCEDES-BENZ GLA45 AMG
Engine:
1,991cc 4-cyl turbo
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 360@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 332@2,250-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 4.8 seconds
Top speed: 155mph (limited)
MPG: 37.6 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 175g/km
Price: £42-£45,000 (estimate, on sale June)








Author
Discussion

TheBigUnit

Original Poster:

364 posts

221 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
I agree on the subject of looks. It is certainly the best proportioned of all the new small Mercs.

dukebox9reg

1,720 posts

177 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Looks one of the better new Mercs to come out but I still prefer the Evoque to this.

Heard an A45AMG in full track attack at Mercedes World and the engine does sound cracking for a 4 pot flat out. Especially the shotgun blast noises on full bore up shifts.

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

247 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
I hope they have sorted the rabid wind and road noise from around the front doors, and I wish the centre console wasn't so 'low rent'

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

215 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
It really isn't that different looking from the A Class is it?

CRB14

1,494 posts

181 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
I think i'd be putting that sort of money on a Macan.

tobinen

10,392 posts

174 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Looks only its creator could love. Hideous

Dave Hedgehog

16,334 posts

233 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
looks far better than the A45, its lost the horrid bulbous nose


dukebox9reg

1,720 posts

177 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Oddball RS said:
I hope they have sorted the rabid wind and road noise from around the front doors, and I wish the centre console wasn't so 'low rent'
I agree the perceived quality is dreadful in these. Steering wheel and everything in view whilst driving looks and feels nice but you only have to look and feel the lower centre console and the trans tunnel cover plastics near the cup holders etc to see where they've cut money.

If you have felt the interior of a Nissan Juke its not far off. Thats why the Evoque might seem expensive when you look at the performance figures but just have a poke round inside of each of them. I can't comment on the Macan but again that's the next size up. This and the Evoque are more Q3 rivals. The Macan, Q5 size.

Terminator X

20,603 posts

233 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
tobinen said:
Looks only its creator could love. Hideous
Looks ok from this angle imho:



TX.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
CRB14 said:
I think i'd be putting that sort of money on a Macan.
I think I would save a fortune and go for a Volvo V40 T5 Cross Coutry, not as quick but quick enough for a small SUV! I wonder how this compares to a Q3 RS?

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

215 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
tobinen said:
Looks only its creator could love. Hideous
Looks ok from this angle imho:



TX.
I think it looks good, as above: not too SUV ish.

dukebox9reg

1,720 posts

177 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Wonder how the next next Mini Countryman JCW is going to compare as it is going to be supposedly slighter larger than the current one and obviously it has a 2ltr turbo to play with now.

Wonder how far BMW will push their 2ltr turbo.

Denver09

134 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Very Nissan Juke(ish) £45k? Would rather buy a sorted used c63 or an SL55 and lease a GLA for 'er indoors with the money left over

f1ten

2,165 posts

182 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
A completely pointless model from Mercedes. Neither off road or decent cornering ability

Quickmoose

5,340 posts

152 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
square'd off wheel arches??

no thank you.

Rick1.8t

1,463 posts

208 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
I actually really like the look of that, dispite me knowing i shouldnt really....

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
f1ten said:
A completely pointless model from Mercedes. Neither off road or decent cornering ability
A completely pointless post by f1ten! Where in the above test does it state that it lacks cornering ability? and the point of the car is to make money for Mercedes by making a car that people want to buy which I'm sure they will achieve.

007 VXR

64,187 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
vomit

hondansx

4,700 posts

254 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
f1ten said:
A completely pointless model from Mercedes. Neither off road or decent cornering ability
Elevated driving position and perceived safety are positives for most people.

Whether it is good off road is not really an issue, but the 4WD again gives perceived safety and genuine ability versus your average Merc, which are notoriously bad in the snow.

It's bewildering to see so many PH members unable to grasp the concept that manufacturers will cater for the many over the few.

WCZ

11,508 posts

223 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
absolutely vile looking car