Is PH a bit too nostaligic ?
Is PH a bit too nostaligic ?
Author
Discussion

J4CKO

Original Poster:

46,836 posts

229 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
In the BMW thread, so many negative views of modern BMW's "I wouldnt have any BMW built after 1990" etc etc, in the Ferrari thread "I am looking for the right Ferrari" and then rattling on about Phil Hill and ancient old Ferraris, jumpers for goalposts, isnt it, marvellous (there you go, a nostaligic fast show quote)

Any attempt at progress, unless it involves more power is regarded with somewhere between extreme scepticism and Luddism, EV's are regarded as a flash in the pan novelty.

Ok, we all like a bit of nostalgia but on here a lot of it is almost religous in its nature and sometimes seems like points scoring to show how well informed people are.

I suspect some are driving round in "icons" that drive them batst with rust, breakdowns, massive expense and general old car crabiness, probably craving a working heater or windows that dont need manual intervention.

This isnt a old cars = bad thing, they arent but can we at least acknowledge the future will happen and perhaps wallow less in the past, there will have been some similar old farts wibbling on about not being happy when all this stuff was introduced and how Senna was a bit of an upstart. I think the past is nice and safe and cosy as its a known quantity, its human nature to worry about the future but lets not turn PH into a hostrical re-enacment society !

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
PH itself (i.e. the site)? No, most of the news articles are about new stuff, not old stuff.

The forums? People like to talk about what they know about. Naturally people know more about current and older stuff than they do about new stuff. It does seem many dislike change regardless but that's probably a fair reflection of society in general. The early-adopters are always in a minority.

mikeyr

3,395 posts

222 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
I hate this sort of thread. There are "reply to topic" options and formatting help available. And swear words automatically filtered out, it is the equivalent of ESC that can't be turned off. Soon posts will write themselves. I miss the good old days when pistonheads was written on slate tablets and you had to chisel your response. etc etc wink

Yes OP, this forum can be a bit King Canute ish but maybe we'll be doing the same in a few years and reminiscing about how small and fun the Porsche Macan was biggrin

SrMoreno

546 posts

175 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
It's down to the user demographic, I think. PH is a very conservative site (in both senses).

J4CKO

Original Poster:

46,836 posts

229 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
mikeyr said:
Yes OP, this forum can be a bit King Canute ish but maybe we'll be doing the same in a few years and reminiscing about how small and fun the Porsche Macan was biggrin
Nail on head biggrin

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Yes, staggeringly nostalgic.

The number of moaners and groaners, "It's not like the good old days" never ceases to amaze.

Having said that, I find myself nostalgic for the days when people with a bit of cash spent it on sportscars rather than hulking 4x4s. Happily there are still some great sportscars out there if you look for them. After all, that's where PH started.

Orangecurry

7,792 posts

235 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
For me the OP has mixed-up a few points.

1) his example of 1990s BMWs is probably that manufacturing quality has varied since then, both in the quality of individual parts and in the way the car was put together as a whole. BMW made their name with cars like the E30, and what has happened since is down to debate.

More importantly

2) modern cars insulate the driver more and more from the road - there are exceptions - but I think you are mixing up nostalgia with simplicity and driver-involvement.

I don't like being insulated from the road. I like to have the maximum input into what happens, every trip.

I'm lucky enough not to do commuting at the moment, but when I did (a few years ago now) I chose a Puma 16v 1.7, because it was the right compromise for me between driver involvement and arriving at work with dry clothes.

Everyone needs a car to do something slightly different, but a petrolhead will make compromises away from comfort and more towards involvement.

Modern cars don't do that for me.

Edited by Orangecurry on Wednesday 19th February 12:08

Polariz

867 posts

184 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Agree as above, though I wouldn't say the forums were overly nostalgic no.

To me, and why I'm here, is because cars are more than A to B pieces of equipment. Car manufacturers these days have to try and build cars that still have soul, while battling EU directives such as fuel economy, noise, or safety (Just look at a modern Peugeot with it's gob-full-of-plastic and you can see that the design decisions are heavily safety based). The biggest element for car manufacturers is of course, profit. I can understand why people would make comments like you mentioned about a modern BMW, because they've tried to design something that is trying to suit everyone and ends up looking a bit generic. They're still very nice though...

Just look at the GT86 though. It's affordable, looks good, great fun and designed with "soul". I think that given the above point, it is harder for designers and car companies to take risks; and when cars like the GT86 crop up in a world of ever-more generic designs, I'm not surprised that some PHers think that it doesn't happen often enough.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

169 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Nostalgia is one way to put it. I know I'm guilty myself.

I won't speak for anyone else but I enjoy cars and I enjoy driving. I don't enjoy all aspects of all cars nor all aspects of all driving. I would not feel enthusiastic about driving a Renault Scenic in stop-start traffic, but I would be equally enthusiastic about driving a Bentley Blower with goggles on as I would be to take a V12 Vantage to the south of France.

Although there are vastly differing opinions about what makes a good car on Pistonheads, a common theme is that we all know what we like and tend to resist the 95% of non-enthusiasts out-voting us in marketing surveys and seeing elements which we value being prioritised below things we don't value, or indeed see activities we like doing replaced by activities which we are indifferent too.

aka_kerrly

12,505 posts

239 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
I can certainly see your point.

Using your BMW example and as demonstrated by numerous threads on here only a small number of people are able to grasp the current line up with 1/2/3/4/5/6/7 X1/3/5 Z? i've probably forgotten some variations.

Also I doubt that in 20 years time people will be reminiscing or planning a restoration project on their E46 320D M sport the way some people will happily rebuild a E21 316i nor will there be the demand like there is for E30s currently.

Could it be that since more and more often cars are referred to as white goods and more people use 2-3 year leases that people simply don't become attached to new cars the same way that they used to.. Buying a brand new car outright used to mean that people would hold onto them for far longer so maybe that is why when you ask someone 20 years later about a car they had for a decade it generates far fonder memories of being young etc than for example asking them about their new lease car which will be given back in a few months.

NerveAgent

3,855 posts

249 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
People kind of get stuck in a certain time period that is their "prime", everything from here is the best. Most people here are no longer in their prime wink

okie592

2,711 posts

196 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Old stubborn people don't like change.

Let's all talk about how great old cars with rwd are and then when someone makes the same things aka the gt86 let's slag it off for having old tech

Adenauer

18,982 posts

265 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
These threads aren't what they used to be.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

169 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
okie592 said:
Old stubborn people don't like change.

Let's all talk about how great old cars with rwd are and then when someone makes the same things aka the gt86 let's slag it off for having old tech
YOu're right that happens but I don't think it's the same posters who contribute both aspects.

For example, that Zenvo got shredded on Top Gear on Sunday for being old-tech and slower than a Focus round a track in the pouring rain with traction control turned off. I'll bet it's far more fun to drive than a lot of the "proper" supercars currently on the market. The price seems hard to justify, granted. I'm sure many more people will simply see a steel chassis car with lots of power and passive suspension as old-hat and nothing interesting though. Personally, I like that. I see supercars as useless toys. The only thing they're good for is having fun and showing off. If the fun goes away that just leaves a car aimed at wkers.

Phateuk

995 posts

166 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Adenauer said:
These threads aren't what they used to be.
hehe

900T-R

20,406 posts

286 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Well, let's take this thing to it's ultimate conclusion - the car that drives itself. That's what governments and carmakes want us to have, and where development is heading.

It's also the exact antithesis of what PH is about.

In the meantime, communication between driver and car is being removed layer by layer, and sold to 'enthusiasts' with 'it's faster along the Nordschleife' - well that does me a lot of good next time I want to enjoy myself in a car on public roads.

This in a society that is hellbent on removing personal responsibility and personal choice in favour of a one size fits all approach, and where 'sustainability' means coercing people into keeping to buy new stuff tha'ts increasingly trivial, but 'greener' than the old stuff we have that's perfectly good because it uses a little less energy in a standardised bench test.

I see the direction in which the great unwashed are heading, and I decide not to go on the same train as them. That makes me not so much nostalgic as someone who likes to forge their own path.


jhonn

1,697 posts

178 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Re. old stuff - 'if they were that good they would still be making them.' A simplistic view maybe - but unless an older product has a unique or currently unavailable feature or characteristic, I just don't see the attraction.

Mark-C

7,629 posts

234 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Adenauer said:
These threads aren't what they used to be.
Pistonheads ... clothing matters? wink

okie592

2,711 posts

196 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
Pistonheads ... clothing matters? wink
So long as that clothing isn't superdry...

Tickle

6,462 posts

233 months

Wednesday 19th February 2014
quotequote all
jhonn said:
Re. old stuff - 'if they were that good they would still be making them.' A simplistic view maybe - but unless an older product has a unique or currently unavailable feature or characteristic, I just don't see the attraction.
I think that's why many PH'rs are referred to as nostalgic because many older cars have the unique/unavailable feature of steering feel and driver involvement