RE: Cheerio Jaguar XK!
Wednesday 12th March 2014

Cheerio Jaguar XK!

PH looks back on eight years of the XK Mk2 with production ceasing in the summer



It was bound to happen soon. With the F-Type barging in on the XK’s price territory and performance, plus the coupe now launched, both were unlikely to remain in the Jaguar range for long. So the XK will be discontinued from this summer with no direct replacement.

ALC previewed the second-gen XK...
ALC previewed the second-gen XK...
Instead, a third generation XK will grow into a larger 2+2, a GT rival for Bentley Continental. But with nothing confirmed on that yet, and the XE small saloon probably taking priority, it’s time to reflect on the XK. And having been around since 2006 there’s plenty to reflect on...

The original 4.2 was driven very nearly eight years ago now (April 5 2006) with a bizarrely prescient PH verdict: ‘The new XK may not be quite the F-Type that we’d all really like to see, but it comes pretty close.’. The handling came in for praise and the styling was seen as better in the flesh than the early press pics.

In a world of 360hp hot hatches, the XK’s 300hp V8 probably sounds a little puny now. If you can live with a GT that’s quick rather than properly fast, an early (and leggy) 4.2 XK is now available for under £14K. For just a little more though, this 70,000 mile car looks preferable if you can stand the wood.

... rather closely as it turned out!
... rather closely as it turned out!
The supercharged 420hp XKR answered the calls of those crying for more speed, and the first cars are now available for under £20K. Both were offered as a convertible too, if you fancy.

In 2009, a facelift swapped the 4.2 V8 for Jag’s new 5.0-litre with another 85hp for the XK and 90hp for the XKR. What was that about performance? Anyway, it also introduced some minor styling tweaks and the rotary gear selector from the XF. Used versions of the revised car start at around £22K for the XK and under £30K for the XKR.

Still not enough power? The XKR-S was introduced in 2011 and, despite 550hp and further improved dynamics, has suffered horrendous depreciation. A car that costs £97,000 new can be had for just over £60K after just 4,500 miles of use.

GT a pretty special swansong
GT a pretty special swansong
There’s was a cabrio launched too, one of which we found for £64,995. Good luck finding one of the 10 UK XKR-S GTs anytime soon...

With a couple of months of production remaining, new XKs are still available in the run-out Dynamic and Signature models. As and when any news is confirmed on another XK, we’ll keep you updated. Tally-ho old chum!

[Source: Autocar]

 





   
Author
Discussion

thirsty

Original Poster:

726 posts

293 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Never liked this car. I always felt it was made from Ford's left over parts bin without a whole lot of real thought going in to it. The F type is wonderful. Maybe the replacement for this one will be a lot better .... although more expensive.

converted lurker

304 posts

155 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
The standard 5.0 is a hell of a lot of car for the money second hand. It's got future classic written all over it.

Well engineered as well with no major problems.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

169 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
They're fairly superb cars in my experience. Contrary to the above, I thought they were pretty good at feeling rather special, and they still look great now.

berlintaxi

8,535 posts

202 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
thirsty said:
Never liked this car. I always felt it was made from Ford's left over parts bin without a whole lot of real thought going in to it.
rolleyes

dukebox9reg

1,720 posts

177 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Only driven a late 4.2 XK and though it sounded wonderful, rode beautifully on 20s and was really comfy. It didnt feel fast in the slightest.

Did find myself blipping the throttle at traffic lights though. Even the standard pipes were spot on. Much louder than an RS4 under load and really quite quiet at a cruise. Boots actually quite useable on the coupe aswell.

oilit

2,806 posts

207 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
friend of mine bought an xk and they claim its been at the garage more often than they have had it with multiple issues...some re-occurring.

MJK 24

5,677 posts

265 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
thirsty said:
Never liked this car. I always felt it was made from Ford's left over parts bin without a whole lot of real thought going in to it. The F type is wonderful. Maybe the replacement for this one will be a lot better .... although more expensive.
Aluminium monocoque is hardly indicative of a parts bin special! These were as advanced as anything on sale at the time.

These are huge value for money but I feel the original
XK will age better long term.

Megaflow

11,498 posts

254 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
I think this is actually a good move by Jaguar. IMO this XK has not aged well, so much so, I think the mk1 has aged much better, and I don't think it fits with Jaguar's current excellent range of cars.

A gap of a couple of years, possibly until the next XJ comes out?, and build a new 2+2 GT, on the XJ platform, and move upmarket a bit to compete directly with the Bentley sounds like a good move to me.

Fress up a bit of space in the range to make a proper hairy chested F-Type as well.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

276 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Lovely. lovely cars.

Last year I got to drive an XKRS on a few occasions. A lovely racing blue one.

I was actually quite shocked at how good it was to drive, how bloody fast it was, and what an epic noise it makes. I would happily own one.

I think they are looking like terrific value used.

And it must be said that the 5.0 V8 is an epic engine. Truly, people hold up the AMG and BMW engines to praise but IMO the Jag 5.0 V8 is an absolute peach. In supercharged form it is simply brilliant.


TheBigUnit

364 posts

221 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
thirsty said:
Never liked this car. I always felt it was made from Ford's left over parts bin without a whole lot of real thought going in to it.
Bit like your post.

Ours was a 4.2. Not fast, but quick, soothing and with the best steering I have ever experienced. It was definitely not a sportscar - though you could steer it on the throttle with ease - but one of the best ways to cover long distances and arrive completely relaxed.

Stuperbulous

330 posts

179 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Good luck finding an XKR-S GT? I still have one in my showroom.

juansolo

3,012 posts

307 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Shame, I liked the elegance of the XK. Interestingly I don't think the F-Type coupe in the flesh is anywhere near as nice as the XK coupe. It would have been nice to keep the XK coupe on and keep the V8s in that, then the F-Type convertibles with the V6s. But that's just me.

bobberz

1,832 posts

228 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Not too sad to see it go. The F-type is superb; everything the XK should've been. I think the XK is a bit redundant, now. Always felt the styling was a bit fussy, though great lines, overall. The headlights and taillights just didn't seem to fit, IMO. I'll echo an earlier comment in that I feel the Mk1 XK has aged quite beautifully, especially the XKR. I don't believe turning the XK into a Continental-rivaling mega-GT is right. The "XK" moniker has always been applied to Jag's sportiest cars. If anything, they should've called the F-type the XK-F and had it replace the current XK.

MyCC

337 posts

186 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
We just had an XKR on test and we loved its character and looks. The 5.0 S/C V8 makes it stupidly fast too with a fantastic noise to boot!

Regards,

MyCC.

dukebox9reg

1,720 posts

177 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
bobberz said:
Not too sad to see it go. The F-type is superb; everything the XK should've been. I think the XK is a bit redundant, now. Always felt the styling was a bit fussy, though great lines, overall. The headlights and taillights just didn't seem to fit, IMO. I'll echo an earlier comment in that I feel the Mk1 XK has aged quite beautifully, especially the XKR. I don't believe turning the XK into a Continental-rivaling mega-GT is right. The "XK" moniker has always been applied to Jag's sportiest cars. If anything, they should've called the F-type the XK-F and had it replace the current XK.
Not really. Only in the US. In the UK it was E-Type and XKE in the US. The E type was a 'sporty' model. The 'new' XK was always a crossover between a sports car and GT so a compromise. The F type is billed as a sporty car again so a replacement for the E Type. The XK should be more of a GT now. Maybe not in the way of the Continental but Panamera or Rapid.

dantournay

492 posts

237 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Shame to see it go completely but hardly surprising. Incidentally, I saw what I assume was a pre-production F-Type RS coupe on the A45 yesterday. It was dark silver with trade plates and a lairy XF-RS style spoiler.

Diderot

9,635 posts

221 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
I still miss mine - had an 07 XKR for about 18 months and loved it. Took it all across Europe and once to Val d'Isere skiing - the chains worked well smile. Fab cars and at today's prices brilliant value.

oldtimer2

729 posts

162 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Hardly a surprising decision given its age and the manufacturing benefits of replacing it with the F-Type coupe; currently the XK and F-Type share the same assembly line.

Ian Callum was interviewed the other day by Road and Track, focussing on the forthcoming XE sedan. He made the point that Jaguar needed to reduce its number of platforms and achieve a step change gain in sales volumes to be viable - to something like 200,000 units a year versus the current c70,000. The success of the XE sedan, and later the crossover, is obvioulsy critical to achieving this volume. He also commented, in passing, that it would be nice to get a 2+2 coupe based on this platform, but said that the engine currently sits too high for a sports car. I conclude from that that they will be/are exploring on the idea but it must be at least two or more likely three years away from realisation.

JulesV

1,801 posts

253 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
Love these cars, shame they are stopping production. Can see myself owning one at some point.

Prawnboy

1,326 posts

176 months

Wednesday 12th March 2014
quotequote all
some of these are an absolute bargain. the mk1 is definatly going to be the classic though.