Mazda MPS - anyone got one?
Mazda MPS - anyone got one?
Author
Discussion

geg1992

Original Poster:

98 posts

166 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
Shall I do it?

I Currently have a Seat Ibiza FR TDI 130, which is decent on fuel and okay speed wise but the MPS is my dream car.

I do 20 miles every day to work, what's it like on motorway MPG?

What shall I look for when buying one?

What are the weak points mechanically?

I have about £6,000 to play with, will that be enough for a decent one?

What kind of mileage do these go on until? I know it varies a lot, but are the engines durable?

Does re-mapping add much mpg?

Cheers!

Juanco20

3,352 posts

222 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
geg1992 said:
Shall I do it?

I Currently have a Seat Ibiza FR TDI 130, which is decent on fuel and okay speed wise but the MPS is my dream car.

I do 20 miles every day to work, what's it like on motorway MPG?

What shall I look for when buying one?

What are the weak points mechanically?

I have about £6,000 to play with, will that be enough for a decent one?

What kind of mileage do these go on until? I know it varies a lot, but are the engines durable?

Does re-mapping add much mpg?

Cheers!
You seem quite concerned with MPG. If that's correct, then an MPS isn't for you

Turbodiesel1976

1,958 posts

199 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
My uncle has one, drove it once, loved it, very quick car and feels well screwed together

ezi

1,734 posts

215 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
All I know is that they are hilariously expensive to run, it's the main reason you see so few of them.

underphil

1,352 posts

239 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
ezi said:
All I know is that they are hilariously expensive to run, it's the main reason you see so few of them.
Less to run than a Focus ST 2.5 I'd have thought ?

ezi

1,734 posts

215 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
underphil said:
ezi said:
All I know is that they are hilariously expensive to run, it's the main reason you see so few of them.
Less to run than a Focus ST 2.5 I'd have thought ?
I don't know how they compare side by side, but being £195 more to tax per years (£475) is enough to put my right off to begin with!

underphil

1,352 posts

239 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
ezi said:
underphil said:
ezi said:
All I know is that they are hilariously expensive to run, it's the main reason you see so few of them.
Less to run than a Focus ST 2.5 I'd have thought ?
I don't know how they compare side by side, but being £195 more to tax per years (£475) is enough to put my right off to begin with!
wouldn't bother me if I knew it would cost £250 a year less in fuel than the ST

theboyfold

11,469 posts

255 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
underphil said:
ezi said:
All I know is that they are hilariously expensive to run, it's the main reason you see so few of them.
Less to run than a Focus ST 2.5 I'd have thought ?
A mate of mine went from an ST to an MPS and complains about the MPG!

GravelBen

16,494 posts

259 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
Are we talking about the 6 MPS or 3 MPS? Quite different cars...

Gun

13,432 posts

247 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
I've had mine for about two and a half years and it's been quite problematic. There are two big issues to look for with these; hesitation under acceleration and smokey exhausts, mine's had both.

The smoke problem was fixed by replacing the turbo (think it had only covered about 40k miles when it was replaced) and I'm not sure how they fixed the hesitation as I've taken it to the dealer so many times it's all a bit of a blur. I do know they replaced numerous filters and sensors during the investigation process.

I does also like a drink and you have to feed it premium fuel (98+ ron).

I won't be buying another one.

geg1992

Original Poster:

98 posts

166 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
Gun said:
I've had mine for about two and a half years and it's been quite problematic. There are two big issues to look for with these; hesitation under acceleration and smokey exhausts, mine's had both.

The smoke problem was fixed by replacing the turbo (think it had only covered about 40k miles when it was replaced) and I'm not sure how they fixed the hesitation as I've taken it to the dealer so many times it's all a bit of a blur. I do know they replaced numerous filters and sensors during the investigation process.

I does also like a drink and you have to feed it premium fuel (98+ ron).

I won't be buying another one.
I guess there's good ones and bad ones :/ how much was the turbo replacement?

geg1992

Original Poster:

98 posts

166 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
Juanco20 said:
You seem quite concerned with MPG. If that's correct, then an MPS isn't for you
Not purely MPG, just need a car that's going to do over 20-25mpg + if possible for my commutes to work.

geg1992

Original Poster:

98 posts

166 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
Are we talking about the 6 MPS or 3 MPS? Quite different cars...
Either really, I'd prefer a 3 though.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

257 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
Always wanted one as have had a Mazda 3 Sport for years. What put me off were the fuel economy and the turbo issues mentioned above.

I'm not sure how the 2009 onwards model has faired, but the previous one was terrible on fuel economy and had high VED costs. They do seem quite rapid though and I had some fun on a test drive of the 2009 model.

The later model has cheaper road tax and a nice intake in the bonnet. The model before that was pretty much a sleeper, albeit with a large exhaust.

Gun

13,432 posts

247 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
It was all done under warranty but I think the turbo was about £1400. Thankfully as the service from one of the Mazda dealers I took it to was so bad Mazda UK covered the cost of all the work as a good will gesture.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

257 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
geg1992 said:
GravelBen said:
Are we talking about the 6 MPS or 3 MPS? Quite different cars...
Either really, I'd prefer a 3 though.
The 6 was fwd and the 3 had 260 horses piped solely through the front wheels. smile

geg1992

Original Poster:

98 posts

166 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
Always wanted one as have had a Mazda 3 Sport for years. What put me off were the fuel economy and the turbo issues mentioned above.

I'm not sure how the 2009 onwards model has faired, but the previous one was terrible on fuel economy and had high VED costs. They do seem quite rapid though and I had some fun on a test drive of the 2009 model.

The later model has cheaper road tax and a nice intake in the bonnet. The model before that was pretty much a sleeper, albeit with a large exhaust.
Yeah the turbo is a concern, although I bet it comes down to people not knowing how to drive a turbo cars e.g. warming and cooling!

I'll try and take one for a test drive first, and ask questions about how they;ve maintained it.

Cheers!

geg1992

Original Poster:

98 posts

166 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
Gun said:
It was all done under warranty but I think the turbo was about £1400. Thankfully as the service from one of the Mazda dealers I took it to was so bad Mazda UK covered the cost of all the work as a good will gesture.
Ouch! I guess it'd be cheaper if it's not from a main dealer!

Driver101

14,451 posts

150 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
If you concentrate on faults, you'll be scared off every car.

The 3 MPS is much faster than people realise. It will hold a Focus RS MK2 and sadly performance doesn't come cheap.


Gun

13,432 posts

247 months

Friday 14th March 2014
quotequote all
geg1992 said:
funkyrobot said:
Always wanted one as have had a Mazda 3 Sport for years. What put me off were the fuel economy and the turbo issues mentioned above.

I'm not sure how the 2009 onwards model has faired, but the previous one was terrible on fuel economy and had high VED costs. They do seem quite rapid though and I had some fun on a test drive of the 2009 model.

The later model has cheaper road tax and a nice intake in the bonnet. The model before that was pretty much a sleeper, albeit with a large exhaust.
Yeah the turbo is a concern, although I bet it comes down to people not knowing how to drive a turbo cars e.g. warming and cooling!

I'll try and take one for a test drive first, and ask questions about how they;ve maintained it.

Cheers!
The smokey exhaust is nothing to do with warming it/cooling it.