Peugeot RCZ R: UK review
It shone in the sunny Med but can it do the same on British roads?

Fortunately and pleasingly, the Peugeot RCZ R delivered over here just what it promised on the Col de Vence in November. In fact, that it has proved so adept in Britain is perhaps a stronger endorsement of its ability.
Let's start with the ride. There's a firmness to the way the RCZ R goes down a road but it's never punishing. That sense of composure and compliance remains regardless of what British roads conjure up. It's a remarkable display given the standard RCZ can often find itself a little flustered, and goes to show what proper geometry work and some choice suspension upgrades can achieve. Furthermore, it's worth remembering that 'R' is very much Peugeot's dynamic flagship and so a focused set-up is to be expected.
B-road reckoner
What a stint on British roads also revealed about the R was a more adjustable (read: fun) side to its handling not revealed previously. Wet weather requires inputs to be finessed to make the car respond and is rewarding because of it. The diff isn't infallible, and will give way to some understeer if you're greedy out of a damp bend.
Moreover, a lift, dab of brakes or some additional lock before exit will get the R's tail mobile, sometimes to an alarming degree. Unruly would be unfair and the RCZ is quite endearing because of its slightly lairy side but it lacks the ultimate composure of a Megane on the limit. Kudos to Peugeot for making the TCS so easy to disable though.
Perhaps the RCZ's biggest failing during its time with us was not of its own doing; that magic sense of flow from older, softer Peugeots is gone. Again the ride is good by modern standards but lacks that earlier genius.
Former glories
But the precise, short shift of the RCZ's gearbox is a revelation compared with what went before and the engine just goes to show where powertrain development has come. The enthusiasm for revs of the 1.6-litre turbo really isn't far behind that of the 2.0-litre lump in a 306 GTI-6, plus the power and torque advantages are patently clear. That it does this while (officially) returning nearly 15mpg more (44.8 versus 30.1) and emitting 79g/km less (145g/km versus 224g/km) is remarkable.
There's a separate blog to follow on some of the disappointments to be found inside the RCZ, but it's worth mentioning the seats are fantastic and the steering wheel nice to hold (remember wheels without buttons on them?). Other parts aren't quite so great...
But overall the RCZ R is terrific, a great return to form for engaging fast Peugeots and a car that augurs extremely well for the 208 R. Don't forget that motorsport pedigree from the RCZ Cup too. Brokers are already offering deal dropping the RCZ R below £30K, where it warrants real attention from anyone after something fast and fun.
PEUGEOT RCZ R
Engine: 1,598cc 4-cyl turbocharged
Transmission: 6-speed manual, front-wheel drive, limited-slip differential
Power (hp): 270@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 243@1,900-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 5.9sec
Top speed: 155mph
MPG: 44.8 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 145g/km
Weight: 1,280kg
Price: £31,995
Photos: PrimeExposures
Not that proper car enthusiasts would buy either imo!
I'd like to see a "Rallye R" version and then use the "R" "Rallye R" labelling throughout the range, "R" for power, "Rallye R" for power and a stripped out lightweight version


No-one wants 27mpg cars in this price bracket.
I never though I would construct a sentence using those words!!!
Much better looking (on the outside) than TTs, Caymans or even the new Alfa coupe thing IMO.
Am I the only one that thinks the steering wheel regardless of being button-less or not looks cheap and tacky.
I personally would have one over a lower spec TT if I was in the market for one and save myself a lump of money but Im forced to drive an auto currently and the pugs auto is dreadful and only coupled to the 156bhp engine so Audi kind of trumps that with their DSG box being offered across the board.
Am I the only one that thinks the steering wheel regardless of being button-less or not looks cheap and tacky.
I personally would have one over a lower spec TT if I was in the market for one and save myself a lump of money but Im forced to drive an auto currently and the pugs auto is dreadful and only coupled to the 156bhp engine so Audi kind of trumps that with their DSG box being offered across the board.
I agree with the steering wheel comment though

Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff










