Xc70 with galactic mileage - am I mad?
Discussion
nct001 said:
wiliferus said:
Any Geartronic of that vintage over about 100k is a ticking bomb.
Why... isn't this the same as the standard v70 automatic with a solenoid to allow sequential changes?And most likely same as found in 5 series early A6 etc?
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=126...
And here -
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=381...
Edited by wiliferus on Saturday 17th May 20:32
wiliferus said:
Really useful info here -
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=126...
And here -
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=381...
It is the same box but with a solenoid... no reason additional failure... I buy these as a trader and like to know any factual reason why the geartronic is less reliable than standard auto?http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=126...
And here -
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=381...
Edited by wiliferus on Saturday 17th May 20:32
wiliferus said:
Any Geartronic of that vintage over about 100k is a ticking bomb.
A common myth regarding the P2 Volvo auto boxes...With regular gearbox oil changes (that should have been specified by Volvo but weren't, which is the mistake) they are no less reliable than any other auto box
That's coming from a "galactic" mileage XC70 owner, bought with 122,000, now done another 8000 without incidence, and it's an auto
the_lone_wolf said:
With regular gearbox oil changes (that should have been specified by Volvo but weren't, which is the mistake) they are no less reliable than any other auto box
But surely that's the problem? If Volvo didn't specify oil changes, the average owner who knows diddly squat about mechanics etc will just service it as Volvo say, so a large proportion of them will have never had an oil change? I'm only passing on the info I found when considering an S60 D5. The amount of info out there on gearbox problems was enough for me to strike it off the list.
Sample size of one but my previous v70 d5 auto had gearbox problems at 113k miles.
I'd still have another but would check carefully there are no problems. You need to drive the car for at least 30mins for the box to get to temp, only then will any problems let themselves known.
If it was all good then I would likely do a fluid change.
I'd still have another but would check carefully there are no problems. You need to drive the car for at least 30mins for the box to get to temp, only then will any problems let themselves known.
If it was all good then I would likely do a fluid change.
nct001 said:
wiliferus said:
Really useful info here -
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=126...
And here -
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=381...
It is the same box but with a solenoid... no reason additional failure... I buy these as a trader and like to know any factual reason why the geartronic is less reliable than standard auto?http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=126...
And here -
http://www.volvoforums.org.uk/showthread.php?t=381...
Edited by wiliferus on Saturday 17th May 20:32
I have an old copy of Car Mechanics magazine where a guy wrote in as an S60 owner saying that 'the problems with these gearboxes is caused by two main things, one being irregular oil changes and the software that Volvo used incorporating the 'stop neutral' function'.
'The gearboxes contain linear solenoids which are magnetic, and if the oil isn't changed, then any metal particles in the oil will stick to the solenoids which causing them to jam up, leading to harsh shifting and flaring. But if you change the fluid regularly and either clean or replace the solenoids(which can be bought for £250) the changes are smooth'.
The guy also said that 'you need to go to a Volvo dealers for a software upgrade, which smoothes out the changes, alters the speeds at which the gearbox changes down, and also removes the 'stop neutral' function which even Volvo admitted was a bad move in the first place'.
I don't know how true any of this is and I'm not a Volvo owner, but I like to keep informed on future purchases. I do wonder how many gearboxes could have been saved with these procedures instead of replacing the whole transmission, which, according to another thread in that link, are used in other manufacturers models with no problems. The difference? Regular oil changes in the service schedule.
wiliferus said:
But surely that's the problem? If Volvo didn't specify oil changes, the average owner who knows diddly squat about mechanics etc will just service it as Volvo say, so a large proportion of them will have never had an oil change?
I'm only passing on the info I found when considering an S60 D5. The amount of info out there on gearbox problems was enough for me to strike it off the list.
Your loss, the gearbox and engine suit each other better than the manual IMO having owned both...I'm only passing on the info I found when considering an S60 D5. The amount of info out there on gearbox problems was enough for me to strike it off the list.
Unless you're having problems already with a high mileage gearbox, picking one up and then beginning good maintenance will have no perceivable impact on the likelihood of problems or the longevity of the box - there isn't any "hidden damage" occurring before the symptoms begin
wiliferus said:
bqf said:
Thanks for the replies - this is a manual version though. Any engine problems at big miles?
You're laughing then.
By the mileage quoted it should have been done once, but while it's a big and expensive job in isolation, over the lifetime of the clutch it's peanuts...
Great cars, you'll love it I'm sure

Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


