959 anyone - seems cheap.

[Brabus Jord]

I saw this on Ebay - seems cheap. i thought they were supercar money.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/131191801272?clk_rvr_id=...

[Badgerboy]

That's because its a butchered 911?

[L100NYY]

Build on a early 1970s Porsche 911

[EricE]

Badgerboy said:

That's because its a butchered 911?

could still be a bargain if there is a 2.4S below this awful bodykit

[Monty Python]

I was amused by the "very rare Classic Car" comment:

Rare - nobody else wanted one
Classic - case of a waste of money

The original 911 would probably be worth more than this.

Edited by Monty Python on Thursday 22 May 15:51

[Ozone]

Based on a 1973 Porsche 911 2.3 .....

[Brabus Jord]

that will teach me to skim read the advert.

[Zingari]

Great comment in the advert:

"dont think it will take long to sell"

Really?

[shoestring7]

Ozone said:

Based on a 1973 Porsche 911 2.3 .....

The capacity of the '2.4' was 2341cc.

SS7

[Ozone]

shoestring7 said:

Ozone said:

Based on a 1973 Porsche 911 2.3 .....

The capacity of the '2.4' was 2341cc.

SS7

I'm sure it's important - pedantry matters

[Mave]

Love the comment 'i don't have time to take lots of pictures'... Right, you can't spend 10 mins with a camera but you expect people to travel miles to come have a look...

[The Moose]

Ahhh - the lesser spotted RHD 959 (without centre locking hubs)...

[shoestring7]

Ozone said:

shoestring7 said:

Ozone said:

Based on a 1973 Porsche 911 2.3 .....

The capacity of the '2.4' was 2341cc.

SS7

I'm sure it's important - pedantry matters

Makes it a 2.3, though. Doesn't it?

SS7

[TooMany2cvs]

shoestring7 said:

Ozone said:

shoestring7 said:

Ozone said:

Based on a 1973 Porsche 911 2.3 .....

The capacity of the '2.4' was 2341cc.

I'm sure it's important - pedantry matters

Makes it a 2.3, though. Doesn't it?

Makes it whatever the marketing department want to make it...
Citroen called the same 2347cc lump "2.3" in the DS and "2.4" in the CX, and the same 2175cc lump "2.1" in the DS, "2.2" in the CX.