Realistic expectations for a 12 month old £65,000 car?
Realistic expectations for a 12 month old £65,000 car?
Author
Discussion

ILoveMondeo

Original Poster:

9,616 posts

255 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Spending 65k on a car that's 12 months old I expect..

1) everything works
2) it's immaculate , as new, you'd be hard pressed to tell it wasn't new other than perhaps a stone chip and the odometer
3) they fix the chips before I come and get it

Am I being unrealistic? I don't think so, I looked at a 14 year old f360 which was as new (other than 20k on the clock)

So far at main dealer I've seen two cars which on paper are perfect.

In reality...

1) very poor paintwork / repair work
2) wonky panels
3) dirt sprayed into paint
4) adjoining panels "sprayed / painted together"
5) knackered seat bolsters
6) scuffs and marks all over the interior
7) masking tape left on after paintwork
8) over spray all over the place
9) interior and exterior trim not fitted back properly after paintwork
10) engine warnings / alarms / etc

What I cant work out is how "hq" sees these cars as acceptable.

Can't seem to get a straight answer from the dealer as to whether I'm being too demanding! I think they are worried about offending me!


swisstoni

23,932 posts

308 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Keep shopping. Simple non?

ajb85

1,124 posts

171 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Performance cars, driven hard, prone to a bit more abuse perhaps? Miss. Daisy won't have been the previous owner.

confused_buyer

7,126 posts

210 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Unfortuataley a seemingly majority of car drivers whether it is a £500 banger or a £80k new car treat their cars very badly and they get in a terrible state within a year.

The standard of 6-12 month old cars at manufacturer sales which end up with franchised dealers is often terrible. On average, I'd say BMW and Mercedes are the tattiest followed followed by Audi & VW.

This obviously is reflected in the standard of stock for sale at dealers who, to make things worse, prep them cheaply.

ILoveMondeo

Original Poster:

9,616 posts

255 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Keep shopping. Simple non?
Obviously, but the question is, am I living in fantasy land trying to find an "as new" car?

Steffan

10,362 posts

257 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
There are dealers about who perform better than the rubbish you have viewed. Find a decent dealer. Not easy but all the cars will not be this poor just a question of trawling the market and seeing what is about. In time you will get a feel for what is actually a genuine ar and there will be a car wrth looking at seriously.

confused_buyer

7,126 posts

210 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
ajb85 said:
Performance cars, driven hard, prone to a bit more abuse perhaps? Miss. Daisy won't have been the previous owner.
By far and away the most abused are "rep" special 2.0 litre diesels but others are also pretty bad. A 6 months old M5 may have been driven hard but many have seemingly also spent their lives taking garden waste to the tip with it just dumped in the car and McDonalds Latte regularly disposed of by tipping down the side of the seats.

I suspect because so few people now actually own their car and have saved up any money to buy it the pride in "ownership" is effectively zero.

Magic919

14,485 posts

230 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
It's not realistic to expect _all_ one year old cars to be like new. It's probably a bit naive to think that a more expensive car will have necessarily been treated better.

I prefer cars that haven't received paint after the factory and seek those out where possible. Sounds like you've just encountered a couple of cars that are not up to snuff. Some dealers will understand, but others just see you as a fussy customer.

Jasandjules

72,584 posts

258 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
OP, I'd want the car in perfect condition for 65k let alone only 12 mths old..

EngageSportMode

41 posts

167 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
I don't think they're unrealistic expectations.

To be honest, on something 12 months old from a main dealer, I'd be expecting none of the above issues to be apparent on a car costing £6,500, let alone one ten times that amount.

Unless the car has literally just arrived and been put on the forecourt, not clearing engine warning lights is just plain lazy.

Thud_Mcguffin

267 posts

232 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
non?
Oh no.

The Moose

23,675 posts

238 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
It depends on what the car is.

A Rolls Royce/P1'etc - you're wrong.

A F type - you're right.

iMiM

87 posts

150 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
ILoveMondeo said:
Obviously, but the question is, am I living in fantasy land trying to find an "as new" car?
Buy new if you want new. Used will always be used, all HP/PCP/LSD/MDMA deals allow people with small budgets drive cars which they could have only dreamed of 10-15 years ago. Pearls before swine etc.

Condi

20,331 posts

200 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
confused_buyer said:
Unfortuataley a seemingly majority of car drivers whether it is a £500 banger or a £80k new car treat their cars very badly and they get in a terrible state within a year.

The standard of 6-12 month old cars at manufacturer sales which end up with franchised dealers is often terrible. On average, I'd say BMW and Mercedes are the tattiest followed followed by Audi & VW.

This obviously is reflected in the standard of stock for sale at dealers who, to make things worse, prep them cheaply.
Company cars. Sold at auction after 2 or 3 years or taken back by the manufacturer, and put on the forecourt. Very little incentive for anyone to go out their way to look after something which isnt theirs and will be replaced in 6 months time free of cost regardless of condition.

Fox-

13,572 posts

275 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
I expect no dents, scrapes, scuffs or marks beyond the odd stonechip on the front on any used car I buy. This might sound ridiculous and it might sound unreasonable, but I've managed to achieve it on numerous occasions now.

Especially on anything from a main dealer. They are top money - there is no more expensive way to buy used than from a main dealer, in my migsuided opinion I believe a main dealer could should represent the very best available. I often find the same as you - and I don't buy them as a result. I always eventually find one that, condition wise, is wonderful. They are out there.

It amazes me quite how tatty some of the stuff is though - some covered in the sort of scrapes you'd be penalised for when returning a 100k mile lease car let alone expecting on a premium 2012/13 car from a main dealer with 20k miles!

crazy about cars

4,454 posts

198 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
ILoveMondeo said:
Spending 65k on a car that's 12 months old I expect..

1) everything works
2) it's immaculate , as new, you'd be hard pressed to tell it wasn't new other than perhaps a stone chip and the odometer
3) they fix the chips before I come and get it

Am I being unrealistic? I don't think so, I looked at a 14 year old f360 which was as new (other than 20k on the clock)

So far at main dealer I've seen two cars which on paper are perfect.

In reality...

1) very poor paintwork / repair work
2) wonky panels
3) dirt sprayed into paint
4) adjoining panels "sprayed / painted together"
5) knackered seat bolsters
6) scuffs and marks all over the interior
7) masking tape left on after paintwork
8) over spray all over the place
9) interior and exterior trim not fitted back properly after paintwork
10) engine warnings / alarms / etc

What I cant work out is how "hq" sees these cars as acceptable.

Can't seem to get a straight answer from the dealer as to whether I'm being too demanding! I think they are worried about offending me!
Masking tape left on paintwork? Ouch, doesn't fit a 65k at all. For that price bracket I'd expect a professional viewing experience where the car has been prepped beforehand.

Zwolf

25,867 posts

235 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
ILoveMondeo said:
Obviously, but the question is, am I living in fantasy land trying to find an "as new" car?
Well there is one way to get an "as new car"...

Used cars are used cars, at any price point, all being relative to their new prices.

Fox-

13,572 posts

275 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Zwolf said:
Used cars are used cars, at any price point, all being relative to their new prices.
That doesn't mean you should expect them to be trashed. Some people are able to keep things they buy nice, these are the previous owners you should aim for.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

177 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
ILoveMondeo said:
Spending 65k on a car that's 12 months old I expect..


...I looked at a 14 year old ...
I'm confused - why the first question example? Are you saying you have the same expectations of a 1 year old car and a 14 year old car, as long as the price is the same?

soad

34,646 posts

205 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
OP is saying older car was fully prepared for sale, no reason why newer one shouldn't be either...