Attempted murder
Author
Discussion

mclwanB

Original Poster:

666 posts

274 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
People who after trundling along at say 45mph in good conditions accelerate at their vehicles maximum rate if someone tries to (safely) overtake them should be charged with attempted murder. Discuss. ..

11110111

612 posts

229 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Would rather not...

TheCarFather

293 posts

167 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Oh dear.

Getragdogleg

10,208 posts

212 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
No, that would tie up Police and legal resources too much.

It should be law that you get a free pass to nudge the car of anyone who speeds up to prevent overtakes right off the road. No assistance will be given to those nudged and their insurance becomes invalid the moment they speed up to prevent an overtake.

* I am not being serious *

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

215 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
How about some kind of auto sensor that makes the car blow up if it detects application of full throttle when there is another car passing on the left.

Slip roads might get messy but it would be a price worth paying.

MikeOxlong

3,114 posts

218 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
The over taker should be allowed to follow the blocking car to wherever it is going and then beat the drivers brains out with their car door. Like Vinnie does in Lock Stock.

kambites

71,462 posts

250 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
It's only murder if they intend to kill you. The closest you'd get with conventional crimes would be reckless endangerment and I think that carries much the same penalties as dangerous driving anyway.

hoppo4.2

1,548 posts

215 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
No they should be charged with being wkers

Blib

48,067 posts

226 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
mclwanB said:
People who after trundling along at say 45mph in good conditions accelerate at their vehicles maximum rate if someone tries to (safely) overtake them should be charged with attempted murder. Discuss. ..
The overtaker should get a more powerful car. Problem solved.

mp3manager

4,254 posts

225 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
mclwanB said:
People who after trundling along at say 45mph in good conditions accelerate at their vehicles maximum rate if someone tries to (safely) overtake them should be charged with attempted murder. Discuss. ..
Or you could just buy a decent car which can out-accelerate any numpty who tries that.

HertsBiker

6,443 posts

300 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
mp3manager said:
mclwanB said:
People who after trundling along at say 45mph in good conditions accelerate at their vehicles maximum rate if someone tries to (safely) overtake them should be charged with attempted murder. Discuss. ..
Or you could just buy a decent car which can out-accelerate any numpty who tries that.
What happens if the numpty also has a very fast car? Ie more money than sense.

standardman

424 posts

197 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
"The overtaker should get a more powerful car"

All part of the risk assessment of the overtake ?


Blib

48,067 posts

226 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
standardman said:
"The overtaker should get a more powerful car"

All part of the risk assessment of the overtake ?
Oh yes, exactly that. Because this is a very serious thread and so I felt it right and proper to provide a very serious answer.

Be sure to take my advice on board and act accordingly. I don't want you going all Prius on us.

nottyash

4,671 posts

224 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
Bit harsh, though they are idiots.

traffman

2,263 posts

238 months

Saturday 7th June 2014
quotequote all
I get this in the van .....or sometimes on the motorways they wake up and undertake , leaving me sitting in the inside lane like a proper white vaaaan maaaan.

mclwanB

Original Poster:

666 posts

274 months

Sunday 8th June 2014
quotequote all
Blib said:
The overtaker should get a more powerful car. Problem solved.
One part of the answer but can't afford one at the moment for the 40k miles I do a year.

Following a numpty in a Suzuki SX4 at 40 in an NSL get to a straight pull out to overtake and floors it. Fortunately must've been in the wrong gear as managed to get past without causing the car coming the other way to have a fit.

Attempted murder mainly for effect but publicising it was reckless endangerment and carried 6+ points and a hefty fine would be a good deterrent.... if we could think of a way to enforce it. TBH numpty probably wouldn't probably have sufficient neurones to realise that enforcement would be difficult!

mclwanB

Original Poster:

666 posts

274 months

Sunday 8th June 2014
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
How about some kind of auto sensor that makes the car blow up if it detects application of full throttle when there is another car passing on the left.

Slip roads might get messy but it would be a price worth paying.
Might have to adjust that for driving on the left or overtaking would be difficult. .!!!

Something that detected a truck overtaking a truck on a dual carriageway and limited slow lane truck to 45 and allowed fast lane truck up to 55 mph wouldn't half help congestion though

FeelingLucky

1,183 posts

193 months

Sunday 8th June 2014
quotequote all
You know that murder is considered a pre-meditated act right?
Maybe they should be charged with manslaughter.....


Ilikebeaver

3,217 posts

210 months

Sunday 8th June 2014
quotequote all
FeelingLucky said:
You know that murder is considered a pre-meditated act right?
Maybe they should be charged with manslaughter.....
But it can't be manslaughter unless they actually cause the death of someone.

Such a thing as Attempted manslaughter?!
smile

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Sunday 8th June 2014
quotequote all
It could be attempted attempted murder, that should stick.