Lamborghini Diablo SV: Spotted
Prefer a supercar with a surfeit of testosterone? Right this way

The new Huracan LP610-4 has nearly 100hp more than this Diablo. That's absurd, isn't it? Anyway, it also indicates where driver aids and chassis technology have come since then; most keen drivers would probably happily get into a Huracan and drive it fairly hard with little acclimitisation period. The Diablo however...
Even the silhouette is terrifying, almost awkwardly cab forward so as to accommodate the giant V12. This one is in a subdued colour scheme but there's an intimidation still to the Diablo's appearance; say what you will about Lamborghini elsewhere but it does aesthetic drama like nobody else. The SV was arguably the most dramatic Diablo to drive too, if the even rarer Jota is discounted. Of course being RWD contributed the majority of that, along with a little extra power and a bit less weight compared to the VT cars.
In a world of supercars that can carry ridiculous speed without apparently straining themselves or the driver, to actually have to work at extracting far less performance from the Diablo may seem strange to some. But again it's the challenge that would be so exciting to the small minority (hopefully quite a few on here) that crave a little bit of terror from a mid-engined V12 supercar experience. Makes it more exciting, right?
With Lamborghini's future apparently committed to 4WD models with automated gearboxes of some kind, will there be a spike in demand for the older cars? The SV moniker was only used on this car, the Murcielago and the Miura and there's no way either of those are being offered at £130K any time soon, if ever. And look at its contemporaries; F50s are soaring and EB110s are way more than the Lamborghini too. Perhaps that's flattering the Diablo a little, but when a 993 Turbo with similar mileage is for sale at the same money something seems a little amiss.
And if it doesn't appreciate? Then you're left with one of the supercar icons powered by a legendary V12 and one of the most intense (that's the polite term) driving experiences around. The SV isn't perfect, in fact it's quite flawed in some instances, but that's exactly the reason to embrace and adore it.
LAMBORGHINI DIABLO SV
Engine: 5,707cc V12
Transmission: Five-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 517@7,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 428@5,900rpm
MPG: Ha!
CO2: See above
Recorded mileage: 24,342
Year registered: 1999
Price new: Probably lots but less than the 4WD cars
Yours for: £129,995
Supercars that are difficult because they are basically user-unfriendly (unnecessarily heavy clutches, very poor or no rear or side vision, too wide for UK roads, too stiff or low for crap UK roads so they tramline and/or bounce on anything but perfect tarmac) I don't like.
Never having driven a Diablo I don't know which camp it belongs to. My prejudices and reading magazine reviews would say the latter but I would like to be proved wrong. Probably worth it for the noise of the engine. Not for shy or retiring types (presumably part of the appeal is the attention it gets).
Funny that this topic comes up shortly after I chipped in my two pennies worth on the subject of appreciating supercars.
I'd said on page 4 of the post below..
" A couple of years ago a friend bought a Diablo SV with 30k on the clock for a shade over £80k and sold it a year later for £95k.
They're now demanding around £125k-£150k.
I wonder if these £125k cars will be reaching £200k in a year or so??"
http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/topic.asp?h=0...
Of course, the SV will probably always have an appeal and Diablo values are probably rising fast compared to this time when dealers felt they couldn't give them away!
The Diablo remains my favorite Lambo by a country mile. What an incredible machine and for me their intimidating reputation for not suffering fools only adds to the appeal.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







