Which 'interesting' next car for £25k-ish
Which 'interesting' next car for £25k-ish
Author
Discussion

Pole84

Original Poster:

595 posts

197 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Debating whether I should change cars…

Currently have an ’09 E92 M3…. Great car, but wondering whether I should try to experience different cars before life gets too serious (read: sprogs). Ideally I would try get a car that’s farily quick (0-60 in 5-ish or less), and doesn’t weight too much. Also, in a perfect world something that won’t depreciate too much over the next few years

Options that I have been mulling (and this is a fairly diverse spectrum), with a budget of up to £25-30k…

1. Porsche 997 Carrera for (c. £25k buys an ’05 with 40k-ish miles on)- Pros: Fresh looks; Cons: down on performance versus the M3… suppose its not a big difference
2. Porsche 996 Turbo for (25k)- Yet to drive one, but Pros: Performance and the way it looks (from the back), Cons: not sure I am a big fan of those headlights
3. Porsche Cayman S (£20k would buy an ’07 with 30-40k miles)- Pros: Apparently great handling car Cons: 2 seats and straight line performance could be better
4. Mercedes C63 Saloon(£25-30k). Pros- That engine; Cons- the interior (maybe its just the earlier models I have looked at) look really bad (plasticky)
5. Aston Martin V8 Vantage (£26-30k will be one of the early ones with 60k miles)- Pros: Looks, engine sound, will probably hold its value better than the others here; Cons: Read quite a few complaints about the lack of low down torque… does it need to be revved as hard as an M3 to get performance out of it?

Any others I should be thinking about? There is always the wildcards, I end up looking in the classifieds at proper luxo barges like an S600… but that is probably a non-starter at this point in terms of driving dynamics

essIII

363 posts

173 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Exige?

itz_baseline

833 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
It would be the 996 turbo for me. Although I would love a C63, I can't help but feel there's still a lot of depreciation left in them, whereas IMO I think the 996 would hold its money better when you look at the way all other AMGs go.

Carreraman

70 posts

147 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
911 3.2. Surefire investment, reasonable to run. 0-100 in 5.8 is plenty for british roads.

walm

10,644 posts

231 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
I have just gone Exige S to E92 M3 because of sprogs.

I would happily hand them back to get my old car back. wink

You haven't said what you use the car for but many people (me included) survived with the Lotus as a daily driver.

I cannot recommend the car enough. Zero depreciation. Faster than almost anything within legal speeds.
Handling - it's a go cart - what do you think the handling is like!!

It begs for trackdays.

Just make sure you get a proper pipe otherwise the sowing machine noise will upset you after a V8.

Pole84

Original Poster:

595 posts

197 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
walm said:
I have just gone Exige S to E92 M3 because of sprogs.

I would happily hand them back to get my old car back. wink

You haven't said what you use the car for but many people (me included) survived with the Lotus as a daily driver.

I cannot recommend the car enough. Zero depreciation. Faster than almost anything within legal speeds.
Handling - it's a go cart - what do you think the handling is like!!

It begs for trackdays.

Just make sure you get a proper pipe otherwise the sowing machine noise will upset you after a V8.
smile Ah yes, i forgot to mention, this is pretty much only a weekend car (i commute on the train), and not that fussed about having 4 seats (although the missus might have something to say about buying a 2 seater as its quite clearly anti-sprog)

vtecyo

2,122 posts

158 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Ariel Atom.

walm

10,644 posts

231 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Not anti-sprog - just pre-sprog.
Or in my case, "last desperate grasp onto my fast-disappearing youth and imminent-sprog-denial machine".

Chris Stott

19,547 posts

226 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
I don't think you can go wrong with a 996 Turbo if you get a good one.

The NA 2WD cars are nicer to drive, but the Turbo has epic performance and doesn't have the potential engine issues.

Dusty964

7,334 posts

219 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
a cerbera for around 18k leaving a slush fund for any niggles.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

169 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Lotus Exige
Mercedes SL AMG
TVR Tuscan mk2
BMW M6

Pole84

Original Poster:

595 posts

197 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
vtecyo said:
Ariel Atom.
Probably a tad on the hard-core side. A boot would be nice. smile

jamieduff1981 said:
Lotus Exige
Mercedes SL AMG
TVR Tuscan mk2
BMW M6
Merc SL & M6 probably too heavy for what I am after. Dont know TVRs at all really.

Herbs

5,119 posts

258 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Exige
Evora
V8 Vantage

Would be top of my list smile

ManOpener

12,467 posts

198 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all



http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/n...



Incredibly fast, light, certainly interesting, surprisingly usable and fantastic to look at IMO. Would be quite surprised it if didn't go up in value over a couple of years.

kambites

71,461 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Ginetta G40R?

Rouleur

7,416 posts

218 months

Sexual Chocolate

1,583 posts

173 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
ManOpener said:



Incredibly fast, light, certainly interesting, surprisingly usable and fantastic to look at IMO. Would be quite surprised it if didn't go up in value over a couple of years.
They are very high maintenance cars by all accounts.

996 Turbo would be my choice. Comfy, fast and your not going to lose money on it.

kambites

71,461 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Sexual Chocolate said:
They are very high maintenance cars by all accounts.

996 Turbo would be my choice. Comfy, fast and your not going to lose money on it.
Would a Noble really cost more to run than a 996 turbo?

Sexual Chocolate

1,583 posts

173 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
Sexual Chocolate said:
They are very high maintenance cars by all accounts.

996 Turbo would be my choice. Comfy, fast and your not going to lose money on it.
Would a Noble really cost more to run than a 996 turbo?
Don't have first hand experience of either of them but have spoken to a few owners of both and the noble seems the more temperamental of the 2. The Porsche is the one I would trust to start in the morning time and time again.

ManOpener

12,467 posts

198 months

Thursday 19th June 2014
quotequote all
Sexual Chocolate said:
kambites said:
Sexual Chocolate said:
They are very high maintenance cars by all accounts.

996 Turbo would be my choice. Comfy, fast and your not going to lose money on it.
Would a Noble really cost more to run than a 996 turbo?
Don't have first hand experience of either of them but have spoken to a few owners of both and the noble seems the more temperamental of the 2. The Porsche is the one I would trust to start in the morning time and time again.
That's strange, given that the two owners I know with them have had no real issues and one runs his GTO3-R as a daily. I'd always been under the impression that well cared for (as any performance car should be) they were very reliable.

Mind you when I worked in Cirencester there was a red GTO that was always in the garage behind my work.