Jaguar S-Type 4.2 SE 2002 - Any good?
Discussion
The draw of..
1. A Jaguar
2. A V8
Is becoming to strong. A potential deal for my MGB and some cash is making the draw even stronger.. Am i right in thinking that the 4.2 V8 is the one to go for? Please dont give me other options as i have just got this one in mind as ive potentially bagged myself a good deal.
What should i look for? Do they sound any good stock?
1. A Jaguar
2. A V8
Is becoming to strong. A potential deal for my MGB and some cash is making the draw even stronger.. Am i right in thinking that the 4.2 V8 is the one to go for? Please dont give me other options as i have just got this one in mind as ive potentially bagged myself a good deal.
What should i look for? Do they sound any good stock?
The 4.2 is a great engine. No particular weaknesses there at all. Sounds good from the outside, very quiet inside though. Gearbox (6 speed ZF) is good, takes kindly to fluid/filter change at 50/60k intervals. I had an '04 facelift and was very happy with it, totally reliable in the time I had it. Only chopped it in because I ultimately wanted an XF. Would certainly recommend the 4.2 (and the R version).
I have the 4.0 and touchwood, it's done everything fine. I've had to do a few things, rear window regulators were stuck, the DCCV is an issue (anyone who says aircon just needs regassing is probably a liar) and just this morning I've heard what sounds like a suspension bush squeaking and also some oil on the damper. The parts arent cheap, a shock absorber is £100
It also needs brakes all round, which I can get for £140 inc pads from eBay.
The DCCV is the only one I'm not happy to tackle myself, it's a £90 part but about 4 hours labour
They're heavy on tyres, and brakes. Best I've seen from mine was 32 mpg on a run from Lancs to Hants, it needed 500 miles to get to 32 mpg average. I normally see 15 around town and 25 on short runs
The 4.2 technically should beat those figures due to the way it's geared, the extra capacity should be offset with the extra gears. If it's supercharged then you're on your own with mpg
It also needs brakes all round, which I can get for £140 inc pads from eBay.
The DCCV is the only one I'm not happy to tackle myself, it's a £90 part but about 4 hours labour
They're heavy on tyres, and brakes. Best I've seen from mine was 32 mpg on a run from Lancs to Hants, it needed 500 miles to get to 32 mpg average. I normally see 15 around town and 25 on short runs
The 4.2 technically should beat those figures due to the way it's geared, the extra capacity should be offset with the extra gears. If it's supercharged then you're on your own with mpg
9mm said:
MG511 said:
9mm said:
Pre-facelift which is not good. As long you're only paying shed money you should be ok.
Would be a 4.0 if pre facelift, not a 4.2 as stated in OP.9mm said:
The major facelift was for 04 models, notwithstanding earlier engine changes and tweaks.
Er....that was the most noticeable external facelift - but the '02 revision got rid of the old Lincoln Style suspension in favour of "real" Jag stuff, dropped the plasticcy interior in favour of Jag corporate style one and replaced the 4.0 litre V8 and 5 speed auto with the 4.2 and six-speed ZF auto box. They also started laser welding around that time.
The 04 revisions were mainly styling, a bit of tech (bluetooth option) and the diesel engine.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


