Car MOT dilemma
Author
Discussion

timorridge

Original Poster:

67 posts

162 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
Hi,


Thought I would look for opinions on here to help aid my decisions with my car MOT dilemma.


My current car has just passed its MOT but I've had news of things that will need replacing as it will fail on them next year more than likely + a host of things that are non MOT related.


The advisories were;


Both rear suspension arm bushes


CV joint worn but not excessively, checked boot and ok


The non-MOT items were;


Clutch may need replacing in next 12 months (I sort of knew that)


It only just scraped the emissions test (possible new CAT needed)


4 tyres although good now will need replacing in 12 months


Timing belt due in 12 months time


Now you might think get rid, but I quite like the car (good spec and good bodywork). Its just clocked 12 years old and 104,000 miles so not ancient yet but its book value is basically scrap or a few hundred at most with the new MOT.


It's really good on fuel and light on the tyres and since I've owned I haven't replaced a major thing except the tyres, air con regas and minor servicing. I do a fair few miles 16 or 17 k per year so total spend excluding fuel/ins/tax so far in two years is about £1700 including the £1000 I paid for it.


I've been thinking of running it for the next 12 months and trade in or scrap against a newer car poss 7k ish. I could manage the loan repayments reasonably ok but thinking would you spend the estimated £800-900 on something worth far less but on a known quantity and hope to run for another 2 or 3 years?


I agree that other things may come up but most of that would probably be need on another car at some point and add in the loan and interest repayments, I'm not so sure now?


I may have missed things but ask away, thanks for reading.

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

193 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
First,what car is it ?

Second,I go by "It's [nearly] always cheaper to repair what you've got than buy another car".

timorridge

Original Poster:

67 posts

162 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
Hi, its a 2002 (52) Mitsubishi Carisma. Reason of thinking its that its got a good solid engine with me being anal about 6 monthly oil changes, partly due to the mileage I do and that it being partly Japanese they generally have good electrics and the main running gear is pretty simple (no DPF, no DMF, no turbo etc)

Pixelpeep7r

9,004 posts

172 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
if you do a fair few miles a year this makes a reliable car more valuable than an economical car.

Have you thought about leasing? you can get fully maintained lease deals for around £100 a month which includes road tax, servicing, tyres etc

you could lease a new diesel like the civic 1-6diesel which just did 98odd mpg over a tank of fuel in some real world tests.

Keep the snotter, SORN it and work on it in your own time and not have to worry that it won't be road worthy for monday when you need it?

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
Routine maintenance items like tyres shouldn't really be factored in on a "keep or bin" discussion. Cambelt is in a similar position but the very long change interval means it's perhaps a bit more relevant, I'll grant you.

So you've got a handful not-particularly-major wear and tear components on a car that's been reliable, if dull. No-brainer to me. Maintain and continue to run.

Matt UK

18,084 posts

230 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
So you've got a handful not-particularly-major wear and tear components on a car that's been reliable, if dull. No-brainer to me. Maintain and continue to run.
Agreed

timorridge

Original Poster:

67 posts

162 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
Leasing wouldn't appeal to me I'm afraid. If I was to spend £100+ on a newer car, just knowing that all that money wouldn't be for nothing (I know cars depreciate).

You sort of confirmed my thoughts.

Way of thinking of this is (ha bit of a brainstorm bear with me)

Spend the money to righten it, work through future issues one at a time. Pocket the loan repayments

Scrap/sell current one and get next to nothing. Spend £130-150 per month on a newer car still having to change tyres, cambelts/chains and MOT regardless.

The other option is out of spending £1000 on someone else's discarded 10 year old rubbish which would probably bring a bill half that again over the forthcoming two years.

I treat mine to a decent clean today inside and out and was admiring it, thinking I cant do this!

Jazoli

9,664 posts

280 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
Personally I'd spend the very bare minimum on it and run it till next years mot and see what it fails on, whilst saving £100 quid a month, all the stuff is just advisory, you say the cambelt is due in 12 months, wait 12 months till after next years mot, then make a judgement call, you will either have a car worth £500 with 12 months ticket and £1200 in the bank, or £1200 in the bank and scrap value of £150, plenty of money to buy another decent car.

Edited by Jazoli on Sunday 19th October 17:02

curlie467

7,650 posts

231 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
To be honest, I wouldn`t worry about any of it for 12mths.
Ignore the advisories, I do and it doesn`t surprise me at all that on each MOT, the same things I was advised to do have disappeared from the advisories list even thought they haven`t been done!

Do the cambelt when it is due or slightly before, don`t worry about the clutch and do the tyres when needed.

23rdian

387 posts

193 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
Like the last poster has said, ignore the advisories. You have just got yourself 12 months of cheap motoring. Its Japanese so will get you where you need to go. The emissions are not an issue with the right garage wink

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
23rdian said:
Its Japanese so will get you where you need to go.
Well, Dutch, but...

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

228 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
12 months MOT banked

Tyres if they are say 3mm now or less if want a fresh set to benefit over winter rather than wearing out existing rubber through winter then putting fresh rubber on in summer months...

Cambelt as others have said wait until result of next years MOT- next year could be scrap it in which case you'll have wated £500+ changing it without any need.

You are at a point of running a car until a part wears out and is such a significant cost to change + what else is just down the line that you offload and buy something else -- OR if everything else is fine it does its job reliable then budget for those items (remember cambelt is potentially a once every 3/5/7/10 year cost).



The car owes you nothing so you could think down the lines of car is worth £150 - needs tyres £300 (guessing for a set) so that's 2-3 years motoring, cambelt £500 3-10 years motoring.

23rdian

387 posts

193 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Well, Dutch, but...
I didn't know these were built in the Netherlands? But perhaps designed in Japan?

PHmember

2,487 posts

201 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
My mum & dad used to have a Mitsubishi Carisma. If I were you I'd be spending as much as possible on Pro Plus.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
23rdian said:
TooMany2cvs said:
Well, Dutch, but...
I didn't know these were built in the Netherlands? But perhaps designed in Japan?
Yep, the old DAF factory was the only place in the world they were built. They shared the platform with the Volvo V40, and if it's a diesel, it's a Renault/Volvo lump.

timorridge

Original Poster:

67 posts

162 months

Sunday 19th October 2014
quotequote all
PHmember said:
My mum & dad used to have a Mitsubishi Carisma. If I were you I'd be spending as much as possible on Pro Plus.
...... I will not bite