0-186mph in 7.7seconds
Author
Discussion

mclwanB

Original Poster:

667 posts

275 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
http://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/move-hennessey-2...

Looks entertaining getting the power down even on drag radials..

snoopy25

2,112 posts

150 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
That.looks.AWESOME!

InductionRoar

2,357 posts

162 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
Dear Mr. Ecclestone,

Turbos don't HAVE to mean quiet.

Yours faithfully,

PH

Kev T360

366 posts

181 months

Sunday 26th October 2014
quotequote all
snoopy25 said:
That.looks.AWESOME!
Agreed. The way it squats on launch is wonderful

paulrussell

2,311 posts

191 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
That's quick but, I doubt it's able to those sort of launches too often as the chassis will twist.

Funk

27,711 posts

239 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Could it go quicker if the bouncing around under launch was sorted out..? Would stiffening the rear suspension further help? Despite the already incredible time, it looks like time is lost waiting for it to settle and straighten up...

Edited by Funk on Monday 27th October 01:18

trackdemon

13,438 posts

291 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Usually, you want some compliance to give traction; the weight transfer the suspension allows should help it off the line (TVR always used to setup their cars with relatively soft rear springs for this very reason). More likely, it could do with stiffer dampers to control the motion - but we are talking about a very extreme example; short of rigid mounts, the amount of energy this thing is throwing out is always going to be 'a challenge' and I'm sure they've gone as far as they can...

ging84

9,548 posts

176 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
that's a stupid car, stupid stupid stupid
when would you ever need to do 0-186 in anything less than 8 seconds?

R6VED

1,492 posts

170 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
ging84 said:
that's a stupid car, stupid stupid stupid
when would you ever need to do 0-186 in anything less than 8 seconds?
Hand over your PH card and close the door on your way out please, never to return.

That is awesome, who cares if it serves little point in the real world. I love it.

macky17

2,239 posts

219 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
100-150 mph in 2.15 seconds yikes

neil1jnr

1,485 posts

185 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
ging84 said:
that's a stupid car, stupid stupid stupid
when would you ever need to do 0-186 in anything less than 8 seconds?
Hmmm, maybe when you are in a drag race...?

ShaunTheSheep

951 posts

185 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Is that a diesel?

But, but all those torques... *shudder*

macky17

2,239 posts

219 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
ging84 said:
that's a stupid car, stupid stupid stupid
when would you ever need to do 0-186 in anything less than 8 seconds?
This is witty sarcasm. The guy is saying 8.1 to 186 is fine. Geddit?

fathomfive

11,234 posts

220 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
The only thing quicker than this is the massive whoosh parrot due for the sub-8 seconds replies.

somynameiswhat

277 posts

159 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
And it's road legal.

PowerslideSWE

1,116 posts

168 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
somynameiswhat said:
And it's road legal.
In the states....

Full interior by the look of it aswell, means it's...well, heavy. Impressive, very.

ZesPak

26,128 posts

226 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
That front hardly seems to touch the ground. Wonder if the 4WD actually does something meaningful with the fronts in the air rofl

The 2.8 sec to 60mph does seem quite "slow" in comparison? There really is a limit to grip...

It's stupidly quick, stupidly loud. I fully expect it to be crashed into the scenery within the month if it hasn't spontaneously combusted by then. Probably costs a bazillion dollars to run as well.

It's the best thing I've seen all year.

liner33

10,861 posts

232 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
I suspect they are actually setting it up quite soft off the line to preserve the transmission/drivetrain , the car is putting a lot of mph on the second 1/8th and has a high speed for a 7.7 run

Very impressive bit of kit

Might be road legal but those slicks wont last long on the road in fact I reckon 8-10 passes and they would be shot

Bluehawk

494 posts

196 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
I wonder what kind of MPG you can get out of that?

I'll get my coat

ZesPak

26,128 posts

226 months

Monday 27th October 2014
quotequote all
Bluehawk said:
I wonder what kind of MPG you can get out of that?

I'll get my coat
It's usually expressed in GPM.