Am I the last person on the planet who like all sports cars?
Discussion
So many brand specific fanbases.
But is there anyone else out there who simply likes sports cars and doesn't care who makes them? Perhaps it helps that I actually buy the darned things too!
Currently driving one from Germany but I'd be in a British or Italian at the drop of a hat if the car was on the button. Sad to see TVR, Spyker and many others hit the fan but have I ever owned either of those? No. Nor have I owned a trackday special from Caterham or KTM; preferring road cars which are homologated for global markets. Never owned a Jag either but that F-type looks pretty serious. And the new Corvette seems a devastating sportscar for the money. Ferrari/Lambo/McLaren? - well I could but it's a lot of cash to chuck at a car which sooner or later you need to drive to Sainsburys.
But is there anyone else out there who simply likes sports cars and doesn't care who makes them? Perhaps it helps that I actually buy the darned things too!
Currently driving one from Germany but I'd be in a British or Italian at the drop of a hat if the car was on the button. Sad to see TVR, Spyker and many others hit the fan but have I ever owned either of those? No. Nor have I owned a trackday special from Caterham or KTM; preferring road cars which are homologated for global markets. Never owned a Jag either but that F-type looks pretty serious. And the new Corvette seems a devastating sportscar for the money. Ferrari/Lambo/McLaren? - well I could but it's a lot of cash to chuck at a car which sooner or later you need to drive to Sainsburys.

Not just sports cars but I increasingly like seeing anything which shows the owner has held on to that last bit of eccentricity, character or stubborness. There's a guy runnign around near where I work in a bright yellow 205 Rallye. I hope he's owned it for years and it isn't just someone's shed (it's back seats are always full of crap), but it brightens my day alongside so many diesel Merc/BMW repmobiles and other practical efficient modes of tranport.
Ozzie Osmond said:
jamieduff1981 said:
The number I'd actually buy with my own money is much smaller,
Yes, I think that's the crucial point.An internet fanbase isn't worth a row of beans unless people with cash are willing to open their wallets and buy the cars!
xRIEx said:
Love 'em all, no matter which manufacturer or country they're from. Unless they're ugly or s
t.
t. feef said:
I like them all. I bought the cars I have because they met certain criteria, and I have some brand loyalties related more to technology and design than brand alone, but I really wouldn't get into a fight over it. So no, you're not alone. They're all good.
Excellent! This is the kind of stuff I was hoping to hear!To my mind the crucial factors are,
1. Does it look right?
2. Does it go right?
3. Can it reasonably be relied upon to continue working?
There have been too many ugly ducklings over the years, and too much over-priced nonsense. The makers sell a few cars initially as "novelty value" but genuine interest never grows.
Mazda have had stunning success with their MX5 and Toyota shifted a good many MR2s before they abandoned ship.
Ozzie Osmond said:
xRIEx said:
Love 'em all, no matter which manufacturer or country they're from. Unless they're ugly or s
t.
t. feef said:
I like them all. I bought the cars I have because they met certain criteria, and I have some brand loyalties related more to technology and design than brand alone, but I really wouldn't get into a fight over it. So no, you're not alone. They're all good.
Excellent! This is the kind of stuff I was hoping to hear!To my mind the crucial factors are,
1. Does it look right?
2. Does it go right?
3. Can it reasonably be relied upon to continue working?
There have been too many ugly ducklings over the years, and too much over-priced nonsense. The makers sell a few cars initially as "novelty value" but genuine interest never grows.
Mazda have had stunning success with their MX5 and Toyota shifted a good many MR2s before they abandoned ship.
The other is a Citroen C6.
Ozzie Osmond said:
So many brand specific fanbases.
But is there anyone else out there who simply likes sports cars and doesn't care who makes them? Perhaps it helps that I actually buy the darned things too!
I wouldn't say I like all sports cars but I don't care who makes them - I like all good sports cars. But is there anyone else out there who simply likes sports cars and doesn't care who makes them? Perhaps it helps that I actually buy the darned things too!

When it comes to sports cars my definition of good is probably quite different than many people's though. Looks and reliability are both a very long way down my list of priorities and within reason I don't care at all about things like straight-line performance and lap times - it's almost all about how it responds and, more crucially, how it feeds information back to the driver. Unfortunately most modern sports cars are rubbish at the latter.
Edited by kambites on Tuesday 9th December 09:29
Hasbeen said:
What is a sports car? I can't think of a sedan with a bit a hot engine as a sports car.
That's a bit of a can of worms isn't it but I think I'd agree with you on hot hatches and sporty versions of normal cars.I'm not going to attempt to define sports cars but I actually don't think power comes into it at all...MX5s for me are most definitely proper sports cars whilst for example an Audi RS-whatever with 4 times the power definitely isn't.
I have a simple rule - if it doesn't look like a sports car it isn't a sports car. 
Conversely, if it looks like a sportscar it is a sportscar irrespective of whether the engine is a 1,600 cc 4-pot or a 5-litre V8.
OzOs
Sticking 600 bhp in a saloon doesn't make it a sportscar.
Sticking a Sport badge on the back of an SUV doesn't make it a sports car.
Sticking Sports seats in a lowered hatchback doesn't make it a sportscar.

Conversely, if it looks like a sportscar it is a sportscar irrespective of whether the engine is a 1,600 cc 4-pot or a 5-litre V8.
OzOs
Sticking 600 bhp in a saloon doesn't make it a sportscar.
Sticking a Sport badge on the back of an SUV doesn't make it a sports car.
Sticking Sports seats in a lowered hatchback doesn't make it a sportscar.
Ozzie Osmond said:
I have a simple rule - if it doesn't look like a sports car it isn't a sports car. 
Conversely, if it looks like a sportscar it is a sportscar irrespective of whether the engine is a 1,600 cc 4-pot or a 5-litre V8.
OzOs
Sticking 600 bhp in a saloon doesn't make it a sportscar.
Sticking a Sport badge on the back of an SUV doesn't make it a sports car.
Sticking Sports seats in a lowered hatchback doesn't make it a sportscar.
Completely agree.
Conversely, if it looks like a sportscar it is a sportscar irrespective of whether the engine is a 1,600 cc 4-pot or a 5-litre V8.
OzOs
Sticking 600 bhp in a saloon doesn't make it a sportscar.
Sticking a Sport badge on the back of an SUV doesn't make it a sports car.
Sticking Sports seats in a lowered hatchback doesn't make it a sportscar.
T0MMY said:
I think it has to do more than look like a sports car though. You could argue an Audi TT looks like a sports car but I'd never say it was one, even forgetting the FWD or diesel versions!
Yep. Nothing to like in a TT.and an M5 (any version) will always be a 4 door saloon....
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


