Artificially enhanced engine sounds..yes or no?
Artificially enhanced engine sounds..yes or no?
Author
Discussion

RDMcG

Original Poster:

20,902 posts

237 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
http://business.financialpost.com/2015/01/22/the-a...


It appears as if this is unstoppable. I recall a novelty plug-in device you could get yers ago so your three-cylinder Smart could sound like an AMG,and it seemed like a good joke. I never for a second thought it would become a widely adopted feature of even performance cars.

Now,listening to a sound sample of a different engine seems to me to be complete deception. I can understand piping some engine noise in, if its actually from the actual engine, but I do not want to have my car lip-synching to a recording or sound generator.

moffat

1,020 posts

255 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
It depends on the car e.g.

1. BMW M3/M4 - should be the sound of the car not fake.
2. BMW i8 - fake sound fine as not an M car and a 1.5


My new 640d has this and to be fair diesels sound totally st so I am happy that my car sounds a little better inside.

My last C63 certainly didn't need it smile

kambites

71,599 posts

251 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
I don't really have a problem with the systems as such. My problem is with the engines that require them in the first place.

billzeebub

3,912 posts

229 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
No

jmcc500

679 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
I guess the point is that YOU, who doesn't want it, can have it switched off and listen to the anodyne 4 pot noise that the car makes. Perfect! Meanwhile, someone who would love a rumbling V8, or a screaming V12 soundtrack can have that. It won't affect you, but they may derive some joy from it, it might make their day a wee bit better, and it might allow someone to experience something they otherwise couldn't. No harm done is there?

V88Dicky

7,373 posts

213 months

Cylinder 8

45 posts

144 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
I've never experienced a car with faked sound but I have to say I hate the idea of it. Especially things like the Renaultsport Clio with the choice of which car you would like it to sound like. Really? I think it would drive me nuts if I had to live with that. I don't mind active exhausts so much, the sound is at least sort of coming from the engine, but any sort of electronic sounds, through the stereo or similar...just no.

Surely it's actually easier for manufacturers to design an exhaust system that sounds half decent than it is to do all the necessary programming to have a digital version through the speakers, matched to the engine revs and so on. Isn't it?

BugLebowski

1,037 posts

146 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Not for me, I'd rather listen to the radio

NomduJour

20,651 posts

289 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Hateful. Demonstrates that neither manufacturer nor target market care about what's important.

jmcc500

679 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Cylinder 8 said:
I've never experienced a car with faked sound but I have to say I hate the idea of it. Especially things like the Renaultsport Clio with the choice of which car you would like it to sound like. Really? I think it would drive me nuts if I had to live with that. I don't mind active exhausts so much, the sound is at least sort of coming from the engine, but any sort of electronic sounds, through the stereo or similar...just no.

Surely it's actually easier for manufacturers to design an exhaust system that sounds half decent than it is to do all the necessary programming to have a digital version through the speakers, matched to the engine revs and so on. Isn't it?
Software and code are cheap and can be switched on and off, a noisy exhaust or (more relevant really) induction system is less switchable, more expensive on a piece basis if it is switchable, and won't appeal to the wider market.

If the sound waves hitting your eardrums are the same (big if I guess!) then what difference does it make how that sound wave is generated?

RDMcG

Original Poster:

20,902 posts

237 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
jmcc500 said:
I guess the point is that YOU, who doesn't want it, can have it switched off and listen to the anodyne 4 pot noise that the car makes. Perfect! Meanwhile, someone who would love a rumbling V8, or a screaming V12 soundtrack can have that. It won't affect you, but they may derive some joy from it, it might make their day a wee bit better, and it might allow someone to experience something they otherwise couldn't. No harm done is there?
Of course people should order exactly what they want. I am not entirely sure that there is always an off switch for this stuff though. I personally want to hear what is really going on, whether its in a three cylinder or a V8.

I suspect that as this becomes the norm, nobody will actually know what the authentic sound is. If there were a button saying "artificial engine sound', that might be more informative.

Tickle

6,503 posts

234 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Definitely no

Cylinder 8

45 posts

144 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
jmcc500 said:
Software and code are cheap and can be switched on and off, a noisy exhaust or (more relevant really) induction system is less switchable, more expensive on a piece basis if it is switchable, and won't appeal to the wider market.

If the sound waves hitting your eardrums are the same (big if I guess!) then what difference does it make how that sound wave is generated?
Good point, I suppose it's just that I wouldn't be happy knowing that what I was hearing wasn't the real noise of the car. grumpy

stumpage

2,213 posts

256 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
First thing I did when we got the VRS was locate the speaker making the fake exhaust/ engine noise and unplugged it. Much better now. Fake noise never matches the real thing.

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
No, just make the damn thing sound right to start with. It's like stability control rather than a chassis that is actually safe to drive.

jmcc500

679 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Hooli said:
No, just make the damn thing sound right to start with. It's like stability control rather than a chassis that is actually safe to drive.
Right for who? PHers who want a fruity noise or Joe Public who wants peace and quiet? Everything's a compromise and this is one technology that removes some compromise.

Hooli

32,278 posts

230 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
jmcc500 said:
Hooli said:
No, just make the damn thing sound right to start with. It's like stability control rather than a chassis that is actually safe to drive.
Right for who? PHers who want a fruity noise or Joe Public who wants peace and quiet? Everything's a compromise and this is one technology that removes some compromise.
For whichever market it's aimed at. Sporty cars should sound sporty, shopping sheds should be quiet.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
I listened to an sq5 with this and it sounded like a very long wet fart, I suppose it is the ultimate way to delude oneself and how sales people can discuss with a straight face I just don't know.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
My mindset was always that I'd try and embrace it for what it was - an attempt to improve an otherwise dull sound. That was until I got a car that does it - and I hate it. It's not that it doesn't enhance the sound, it's just that it's so predictable. Over 2500rpm and there it is. It's just annoying.

Ali_T

3,379 posts

287 months

Thursday 22nd January 2015
quotequote all
Electronic sounds are a definite no. Resonance tubes and exhaust flaps I'm fine with. Pretend exhaust pops from fuel being injected in the exhaust should be an arrestable offence.A45, I'm looking at you.