RE: Jaguar F-Type 4WD and manual: Driven
RE: Jaguar F-Type 4WD and manual: Driven
Wednesday 4th February 2015

2015 Jaguar F-Type AWD and manual | Review

Sensible pants (relatively) four-wheel drive F-Type tested alongside long-awaited manual - happy days!



It's just a smidge too fast, there's no excusing it. The instructor on the passenger seat is probably already re-negotiating his contract with Jaguar. But in the spirit of all good journalistic helmsmanship the optimistic entry speed is all about seeing what happens next.

Surprisingly enough for the cynics the new electric power steering delivers the incoming message sharply and accurately. Resistance to the left-handed turn-in gradually and effortlessly decreasing. The steering wheel begins to rotate back to the centre position as the nose points too far in, then the corner really starts to begin. That'll be the lairy, oversteering slide for the photographer.

But what next? On last year's model it would be a gentle breath on the gas. A mosquito's wing-beat on the right pedal. This is a 550hp Jaguar F-Type V8 S, after all.

The power feeds instantly to the rear, threatening 360-degree catastrophe for a fraction of a second. Then around half of that cacophony gets shunted to the front axle and the photographer gets his shot. All four wheels spinning under power, smoke beginning to plume as we slide through another turn of Estoril circuit.


Within seconds, the Jag pulls itself straight. No further input from the driver, it thunders down the straight with irrepressible speed and noise.

Yes, it's all-wheel-drive. Yes, it's easier-to-drive too. Does that make it any less of a driver's car? No, really it's not. At any speed this side of sanity, the AWD mode tricks you into believing the latest Jaguar is still RWD.

And for anybody who's ever driven the biggest and baddest RWD F-Type on wet back lanes or around greasy city-centre roundabouts, coated in the finest oily, taxi juices, this is a really good thing. Any type of progress in the old car needed perfect conditions or the only thing making an impression would be the glowing orange TC light.

Dan's 'ring-trip last year gave the biggest Jag its opportunity to impress, but even with a grin that threatened to become permanent, he had to admit that in the wet it wasn't quite such a confidence inspiring beast.


The addition of all-wheel drive will not spoil your dry weather too much, though it might reduce the length of the elevens drawn on corner exits, if not the frequency. If this glowing praise of such a 'simple' torque-on-demand AWD system still leaves you colder than December's turkey, don't worry. You just saved yourself nearly £5,000 off the option sheet. Yep, that's how much Intelligent Driveline Dynamics will cost you.

In fact, if you're the sort of guy to eschew sensible, performance enhancing and safety improving systems like AWD, you can save yourself nearly £50K off the price of your next F-Type. Drop the brain-melting, £97,135 F-Type R Convertible in favour of a £51,250 F-Type V6 Coupe. Do it.

Yes, it's time to talk about the really exciting addition to the 2015 F-Type line-up. The manual gearbox. Looking at the non-S entry-level 340hp V6 it's terrible for fuel consumption (28.8mpg manual versus 33.6mpg auto), it adds nearly half a second to your 0-62mph time (5.7 seconds manual versus 5.3 auto) but it's brilliant and we love it.

While the looks of the F-Type might be almost identical (barring some slight bonnet bulge reprofiling on the AWD model) it's the addition of a DIY shifter that's really got us excited. Forget the X-Type's five-speed manual for a second and you'd have to look back to the X300-series XJ or even the mighty XJ220 to find a manual 'box in a quick Jag.


Don't worry too much though, as the new one's a pleasure, but still a Jaguar. It's not that quick to shift, not in the league of benchmarks like a well-adjusted GT3 RS, for example. There's a lovely little click from position to position in the 'box, your elbow just clearing the rear firewall. You might want to check that if you're over six foot, though.

The clutch isn't too light either, though the weight isn't unwelcome when deploying the 380hp of the V6 S. Considering the torque demands and the delightfully short push from top to bottom, that's no big surprise. It's just the entry price to this olde worlde extravagance.

Is it a good idea though? Well, it's the cable TV argument, isn't it? With 880 channels to choose from, sometimes you still can't find anything on TV. Likewise, eight instantly selected speeds of the auto can leave you with a lot of button clicking but no real understanding of what's happening. Instead make every shift into a task, an occasion, and you'll shift less and appreciate what you have more. And then you really start to feel the torque, the noise and understand every single rpm of the big V6. It's a whole new lease of life for what many might see as the poor relation of the F-Type family.

With these new options in the mix, you might have noticed the F-Type range has been bumped up to a whopping 14 different models. Unfortunately, as previously discussed, the 'hero' spec model doesn't exist yet; the 550hp F-Type R with a manual. Though it sure sounds like a job for the new SVO department.


Inside and under the skin there are plenty more worthy upgrades to the 2016 model year machines. New extra-cost bodykits (Sport Design Packs) give the model some more presence for extra outlay. The InControl entertainment systems offer smartphone access and some interesting functions (when they don't crash, pre-production examples tested here, etc...). Oh, and you can spec the vaguely useful Torque Vectoring By Braking (TVBB) system on to the basic model now (at extra cost). It's still standard on the R and newly standard on the S.

Not that any of this blatant frippery matters when compared to the previously discussed mechanical headlines. The superbly-riding, apocalyptic sounding, unaplogetically British F-Type is now available with a good manual gearbox (for the drivers) or slightly hooligan AWD system (for the drivers who want to go even faster). Everything else is just very good window-dressing.

Estoril in the Jaguar F-Type V6 manual

Estoril in the Jaguar F-Type R AWD


SPECIFICATION | 2015 JAGUAR F-TYPE S COUPE MANUAL
Engine:
2,995cc V6 supercharged
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 380@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 339@3,500-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 5.5sec
Top speed: 161mph
Weight: 1,585kg
MPG: 28.8mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 234g/km
Price: £60,250 (before options)

SPECIFICATION | 2015 JAGUAR F-TYPE R COUPE AWD
Engine:
5,000cc V8 supercharged
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 502@3,500-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.9sec
Top speed: 171mph
Weight: 1,730kg
MPG: 25.0mpg (NEDC combined)
CO2: 269g/km
Price: £91,650 (before options)


Author
Discussion

mrclav

Original Poster:

1,645 posts

254 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Where's all the nay-saying folk now...?

StottyEvo

6,860 posts

194 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Why the hell is it so slow 0-60

anonymous-user

85 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
ok, i knows it's only money, but £91,650 for an F type? Is it just me, or is that an enormous amount of money, bearing in mind it'll be worth £50k tops next year?

406highlander

182 posts

164 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
That V8.

WANT. WANT. WANT. WANT. WANT. WANT. WANT. woohoocloud9

DukeDickson

5,060 posts

244 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
Why the hell is it so slow 0-60
Even though they're irrelevant in our world, willy waving etc, the quoted top speeds are just as cack for the very healthy pricetags being quoted.


Matt UK

18,084 posts

231 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Ooh, spanish V6 S for me please!

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

227 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Genuine post;

I actually got half way through the article and then scrolled to the end to see who the journo was that wrote it.

Well done Dale, thats how an article should be written. Properly put me in the seat of the car & dare i say it, reminded me of a certain Bulgin, maybe even Nichols smile

As for the car, sounds good.

unsprung

6,055 posts

155 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Genuine post;

I actually got half way through the article and then scrolled to the end to see who the journo was that wrote it.

Well done Dale, thats how an article should be written. Properly put me in the seat of the car & dare i say it, reminded me of a certain Bulgin, maybe even Nichols smile

As for the car, sounds good.
I did the same: jumped to the end to see the byline. Proper writing, this.





robm3

4,930 posts

258 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Dale is a great guy, a car nut a skilled racer and writes well. I'm glad he's doing more of the stories at PH.

Now all we need is an update on his personal track car.

As for the Jag, I'm in no rush to change mine but may try that manual out when one arrives at our local dealer.

Polarbert

17,936 posts

262 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Manual gearbox. biggrin

drpep

1,761 posts

199 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
Look at that body roll. A pretty 2 seater sports coupe which weights more than the outgoing V8 M3, and requires 4WD traction to beat it to 60. I want to like these, really I do, but I can't help but feel it's pandering to Kensington cruisers rather than pan-continental blatting and the occasional track-day. 1780KG! What's it made from? Chassis by LeCreuset?

Sorry, I'll take a GT4 Cayman any day of the week; guaranteed to put more smiles on your face in that porker, than this er... porker. I'm just not the target market. Really hope Jaguar do well from this, but it's not for my stable.

Edited by drpep on Wednesday 4th February 03:40

speedjockey

131 posts

167 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
What a day for the motoring world! 3 new outstanding cars ALL with manuals!! Maybe the ultimate modern three car garage?:
New Focus RS as the daily, Cayman GT4 for the track days & F-Type V6 S convertible w/manual to enjoy the sun smile

Recon it'd be up there...


GravelBen

16,539 posts

261 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
I wonder if the official fuel economy difference exists at all in the real world, or if its just down to the way the standard test favours automatics.

I like 4wd, but I think I'd be more tempted by the manual V6 if I was in the market for one of these.

jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

171 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
drpep said:
Look at that body roll. A pretty 2 seater sports coupe which weights more than the outgoing V8 M3, and requires 4WD traction to beat it to 60. I want to like these, really I do, but I can't help but feel it's pandering to Kensington cruisers rather than pan-continental blatting and the occasional track-day. 1780KG! What's it made from? Chassis by LeCreuset?

Sorry, I'll take a GT4 Cayman any day of the week; guaranteed to put more smiles on your face in that porker, than this er... porker. I'm just not the target market. Really hope Jaguar do well from this, but it's not for my stable.

Edited by drpep on Wednesday 4th February 03:40
You should honestly try driving one before deciding that German thing is the better car for you.

neil1jnr

1,485 posts

186 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
StottyEvo said:
Why the hell is it so slow 0-60
What are you talking about?

kambites

71,643 posts

252 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
drpep said:
Look at that body roll.
That's not a bad thing if it's properly damped. One of the problems with modern sports cars is that they're almost all too stiff in roll, IMO. Yes it gives more lateral grip but for me that's really not a good thing in a road car and it also makes it harder to find the limits without breaching them.

Edited by kambites on Wednesday 4th February 08:39

J4CKO

47,008 posts

231 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
neil1jnr said:
StottyEvo said:
Why the hell is it so slow 0-60
What are you talking about?
I think he means 3.9 seconds is a little passe, nowadays, it taking a full 1.1 seconds longer than a Nissan GTR, however I suspect it is plenty fast enough, and then some, and then some more, headline numbers aside.


jamieduff1981

8,092 posts

171 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
neil1jnr said:
StottyEvo said:
Why the hell is it so slow 0-60
What are you talking about?
I think he means 3.9 seconds is a little passe, nowadays, it taking a full 1.1 seconds longer than a Nissan GTR, however I suspect it is plenty fast enough, and then some, and then some more, headline numbers aside.
Quite. My only gripe with the 485ps F-Type V8S was that it was too powerful to enjoy the engine if driving with any degree of restraint. A "slow" 5.7 seconds to 60 V6 making great noises and a manual gearbox would in reality be the next step up from the pleasures of thrashing an MX-5.

freeman2344

5 posts

145 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I think he means 3.9 seconds is a little passe, nowadays, it taking a full 1.1 seconds longer than a Nissan GTR, however I suspect it is plenty fast enough, and then some, and then some more, headline numbers aside.
I do believe the man is referring to the V6S Manual time, which is 5.7 seconds and therefore, indeed, somewhat slow given the quite substantial amount of 380HP. It is roughly on par with the, often derided, Non-S Boxster and Cayman variants.

freeman2344

5 posts

145 months

Wednesday 4th February 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I think he means 3.9 seconds is a little passe, nowadays, it taking a full 1.1 seconds longer than a Nissan GTR, however I suspect it is plenty fast enough, and then some, and then some more, headline numbers aside.
I do believe the man is referring to the V6S Manual time, which is 5.7 seconds and therefore, indeed, somewhat slow given the quite substantial amount of 380HP. It is roughly on par with the, often derided, Non-S Boxster and Cayman variants.