Discussion
t400ble said:
What an odd post.
Not a pretty car, is it? 
Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
soad said:
Not a pretty car, is it? 
Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
Exactly, it's one exceptionally ugly car but surely must have redeeming features hence my question. It could be fantastic underneath for all I know. This is why I'm curious as to what persuades people to buy them ;-)
Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
Boosted LS1 said:
J4CKO said:
High up driving position, reliability, less prone to poor road surfaces, they look a bit different, not that expensive, fairly economical, well made in England, four wheel drive available.
Thanks. I didn't know they were made here.I think Nissan took a gamble with it and it has paid off, certainly see a lot of them, most other family oriented Japanese cars are pretty forgettable, their own Quashkai is a pretty forgettable thing even if its meant to be quite decent.
Vauxhall make some pretty good looking cars, well, the Astra is fairly handsome anyway but not sure it does it much good, I dont think cars have to be conventionally good looking to sell well, the Juke is certainly distinctive, I quite like it.
Had one short term when my old A3 was in for warranty work.
Have to say it was pleasantly surprised, handled ok, good driving position, steering wasn't lifeless and it had loads of kit. I barely drove it as the girlfriend wanted to drive everywhere while I had it.
Not sure I'd buy one, the engine was hard work, very small boot and not economical in 1.6 petrol at least.
Have to say it was pleasantly surprised, handled ok, good driving position, steering wasn't lifeless and it had loads of kit. I barely drove it as the girlfriend wanted to drive everywhere while I had it.
Not sure I'd buy one, the engine was hard work, very small boot and not economical in 1.6 petrol at least.
Boosted LS1 said:
soad said:
Not a pretty car, is it? 
Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
Exactly, it's one exceptionally ugly car but surely must have redeeming features hence my question. It could be fantastic underneath for all I know. This is why I'm curious as to what persuades people to buy them ;-)
Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
What about those Citroen Cactus things, too...
PorkInsider said:
Yep, interesting question...
What about those Citroen Cactus things, too...
I don't like the styling of the Cactus but I like the concept.What about those Citroen Cactus things, too...
Designed to do no more than 118 mph IIRC so components can be designed lighter so saving weight. It's something like 200kg lighter than the equivalent Citroen C4 I think.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



