Nissan Juke
Author
Discussion

Boosted LS1

Original Poster:

21,200 posts

291 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I know it's down to personal taste but what is it that makes people buy these cars? Is there something I've not spotted.

KTF

10,717 posts

181 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Those who like it, buy it, those who don't, don't. Just like any other purchase.

Who would have thought.

t400ble

1,804 posts

152 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
What an odd post.

BFG TERRANO

2,172 posts

179 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Not for me... But I do like the cube... I'll get my coat.

J4CKO

47,043 posts

231 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
High up driving position, reliability, less prone to poor road surfaces, they look a bit different, not that expensive, fairly economical, well made in England, four wheel drive available.


soad

34,743 posts

207 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
t400ble said:
What an odd post.
Not a pretty car, is it? wink

Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.

Boosted LS1

Original Poster:

21,200 posts

291 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
soad said:
Not a pretty car, is it? wink

Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
Exactly, it's one exceptionally ugly car but surely must have redeeming features hence my question. It could be fantastic underneath for all I know. This is why I'm curious as to what persuades people to buy them ;-)

Boosted LS1

Original Poster:

21,200 posts

291 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
High up driving position, reliability, less prone to poor road surfaces, they look a bit different, not that expensive, fairly economical, well made in England, four wheel drive available.
Thanks. I didn't know they were made here.

J4CKO

47,043 posts

231 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
J4CKO said:
High up driving position, reliability, less prone to poor road surfaces, they look a bit different, not that expensive, fairly economical, well made in England, four wheel drive available.
Thanks. I didn't know they were made here.
Yeah, made in Sunderland, but are also made in other Nissan factories globally.

I think Nissan took a gamble with it and it has paid off, certainly see a lot of them, most other family oriented Japanese cars are pretty forgettable, their own Quashkai is a pretty forgettable thing even if its meant to be quite decent.

Vauxhall make some pretty good looking cars, well, the Astra is fairly handsome anyway but not sure it does it much good, I dont think cars have to be conventionally good looking to sell well, the Juke is certainly distinctive, I quite like it.

PGNCerbera

3,048 posts

197 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I find them oddly appealing. Tried to get one for my wife but she was not impressed.

I especially like the more fruity versions.

My fondness for the Juke surprised even myself

andburg

8,774 posts

200 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Had one short term when my old A3 was in for warranty work.

Have to say it was pleasantly surprised, handled ok, good driving position, steering wasn't lifeless and it had loads of kit. I barely drove it as the girlfriend wanted to drive everywhere while I had it.

Not sure I'd buy one, the engine was hard work, very small boot and not economical in 1.6 petrol at least.

Bennet

2,133 posts

162 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
The Parkers review (or more or less any other) would probably answer your questions.

Fastchas

2,849 posts

152 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I think leasing may be a popular option and the price explains why so many are on the road. My girlfriend has one and pays £150 pm. It's actually OK, I've drove it a few times. Power option button needs to be on SPORT all the time if you actually need to be anywhere though! biggrin

PorkInsider

6,633 posts

172 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
soad said:
Not a pretty car, is it? wink

Before looking at the Nissan Juke, it is essential to re-align your brain's interpretation of the visual stumuli.
Otherwise the Juke will appear to resemble a giant fetid jelly being sucked into a trans-dimensional vortex. Or something.
Exactly, it's one exceptionally ugly car but surely must have redeeming features hence my question. It could be fantastic underneath for all I know. This is why I'm curious as to what persuades people to buy them ;-)
Yep, interesting question...

What about those Citroen Cactus things, too...

LordGrover

34,189 posts

243 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
The tus is superfluous.

Composite Guru

2,522 posts

234 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I got mine because i get a nissan lease scheme through work which is too good not to take up.
Personally i wouldn't of actually bought one myself but its a pretty good drive, good spec and returns a good MPG too.


Gilhooligan

2,221 posts

175 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
They are my guilty pleasure car that I would probably own for commuting to work. High up driving position and, presumably, enough space to chuck the mountain bike in the back.
I'll have mine in that bright yellow colour they do to further polarise opinion ;-).

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

221 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I'd rather drive an ugly car than a bland one any day.

Hudson

1,857 posts

218 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I want the one Nissan made with the GTR engine and running gear.

They're hideous, but strangely appealing.

Devil2575

13,400 posts

219 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
PorkInsider said:
Yep, interesting question...

What about those Citroen Cactus things, too...
I don't like the styling of the Cactus but I like the concept.

Designed to do no more than 118 mph IIRC so components can be designed lighter so saving weight. It's something like 200kg lighter than the equivalent Citroen C4 I think.