SLK 55 AMG or 135i M Sport?!
SLK 55 AMG or 135i M Sport?!
Author
Discussion

wadsy

Original Poster:

369 posts

287 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
I'm considering one or other of the above as an alternative to my 996 C2.

I know they are rather different!....The head says the 135i and the heart says the AMG.

Any thoughts please on the pros and cons of either?

Cheers

turbobloke

117,512 posts

291 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Cars are probably more a matter of the heart ruling the head with PHers but as with all generalisations there are exceptions! Your heartstrings may be plucked by something completely different to mine but I'd go for the AMG because a) every time I got in it I'd be glad I chose the AMG and b) every time I got in the BMW I'd wish I'd got the AMG. In terms of ownership costs it's a matter of priorities so naturally any spending on a p&j comes first wink

daveco

4,418 posts

238 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Test drive both and see what you think.

The AMG will undoubtedly sound the more special of the two and is far more rare.

I'd probably go SLK on this as the 135 is a mess design wise imo.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
This is New Pistonheads........ 116d, you don't need anything more than that in the real world.

turbobloke

117,512 posts

291 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
daveco said:
Test drive both and see what you think.

The AMG will undoubtedly sound the more special of the two and is far more rare.

I'd probably go SLK on this as the 135 is a mess design wise imo.
Absolutely, a test drive in each will represent an acid test - however for me and possibly others it may not turn out as the be-all and end-all.

For some cars the TJO (Total Joy of Ownership) includes factors that apply when the car is parked up, stationary, not moving, going nowhere. I confess to buying a car which had moderate prior era handling capabilities and in the era of purchase wasn't that fast in a straight line compared to lesser but more modern machines. The gearbox was a pig until it had warmed up the change of the day was 1st to 3rd, but the process of changing gear was still wonderful. It looked absolutely phenomenal (to me) and every drive was an occasion in spite of the "other-era" shortcomings - there was no hestitation in buying it over, say, an M5.

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

229 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Given the budget have you considered the SL55 K AMG "Brutus".

smile. Once test driven you'll buy it.

wadsy

Original Poster:

369 posts

287 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
Given the budget have you considered the SL55 K AMG "Brutus".

smile. Once test driven you'll buy it.
What's the "Brutus"?

WCZ

11,568 posts

225 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
wadsy said:
What's the "Brutus"?
no idea but if you could find a Brabus then they're pretty nifty too

Welshbeef

49,633 posts

229 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
wadsy said:
Welshbeef said:
Given the budget have you considered the SL55 K AMG "Brutus".

smile. Once test driven you'll buy it.
What's the "Brutus"?
Sorry it's the nickname of the wonderful 5.4V8 supercharged 500bhp unit. Sounds amazing and goes like stink.


Then again you could go for the SL65 AMG (6.4ltr V12 bi turbo) something like 640bhp crazy fast.

turbobloke

117,512 posts

291 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
wadsy said:
Welshbeef said:
Given the budget have you considered the SL55 K AMG "Brutus".

smile. Once test driven you'll buy it.
What's the "Brutus"?
Sorry it's the nickname of the wonderful 5.4V8 supercharged 500bhp unit. Sounds amazing and goes like stink.


Then again you could go for the SL65 AMG (6.4ltr V12 bi turbo) something like 640bhp crazy fast.
And for the beast that it is, great handling aided by MB wizardry. One of my most memorable moments was watching a small snip of an F1 race in an SL65 biturbo doing a smidgen under 200 mph, it was fast enough as standard but had been tuned and had the TV enabled for all-time viewing. In the twisties it stuck like the proverbial to the blanket.

WarnieV6GT

1,442 posts

230 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
AMG.

Can't believe your even asking wink

wadsy

Original Poster:

369 posts

287 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies chaps smile

anonymous-user

85 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
WarnieV6GT said:
AMG.

Can't believe your even asking wink
Me neither!

Patrick Bateman

13,218 posts

205 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
No contest, Merc.

LordHaveMurci

12,338 posts

200 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
996 is better than either. AMG sounds epic But is auto only, not the sharpest drive & everybody will think you'Re a hairdresser apparently. 135i is a junior supercar don't you know wink

Patrick Bateman

13,218 posts

205 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
It's the M135i that's the true junior supercar.

MattHall91

1,275 posts

155 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
M135i with the Auto gearbox.

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

194 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
SLK....simply because it's a convertible and a V8.

The BMW is neither of those obvs.

richs2891

906 posts

284 months

Wednesday 9th September 2015
quotequote all
Oh that an easy one, SLK as ta least it looks special (and has a V8) and wont be mistaken for a 116d !

sjj84

2,396 posts

250 months

Saturday 12th September 2015
quotequote all
Of those two I'd pick the amg every single time without question. Never personally seen the appeal of the 1 series, even in 135 guise.