It's NOT an MX5...
Author
Discussion

Sterillium

Original Poster:

22,350 posts

246 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
I almost accidentally sold a car last week. I'm good like that... accidental purchases, unplanned selling, stupid whims etc etc. But I made a conscious decision NOT to get rid of a car, because I genuinely don't know what I'd replace it with.

It's nothing special, it's just an old SAAB 93 Aero Convertible. It's in great condition, it has had some under-the-bonnet fettling, extra strut braces a nice stainless steel exhaust system and some kind of magical remapping wizardry that I don't understand, but the result is a very fast, very comfortable and reliable car that I've really enjoyed zooming about in this afternoon whilst the sun was shining.



I know it's not a "classic" yet, but it could heading that way, especially in manual Aero form. But heated seats, iphone connected radio, air con etc make it genuinely useable in all sorts of ways - it has rear seats and a useable boot space too.

It ticks a lot of boxes and I can't think what else would hit the following criteria:

Fast.
Classic looks.
Roofless.
Four seats and a boot.
Reliable.
Comfortable.

Obviously if I remove the "four seats" stipulation an MX5 - although not FAST would fit well (I've had several) but I just can't see another car that would do all these things for the price of one the "bad" MOTs on one of my TVRs.

So I might keep it and slowly bring it back to as near "mint" as I can.

What other cars would you consider to tick these boxes?

Or have you ever kept a car for similarly odd reasons?


RemyMartin81D

6,759 posts

226 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.

Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.

Andy665

4,025 posts

249 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
That looks lovely OP - best spec and certainly a car Is like to own one day, had the next gen Aero convertible for a while but prefer this 2nd gen model

bennettse2025

202 posts

94 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
I love those alloys

brrapp

3,701 posts

183 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
CLK ?

Cupramax

10,868 posts

273 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.

Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
You’ve been reading too many Internet forums, have you ever even actually driven one?

EDLT

15,421 posts

227 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.

Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
Plenty of classic cars having glaring build quality and reliability issues, even if you exclude rust.

Sterillium

Original Poster:

22,350 posts

246 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.

Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
This is a valid point, but I'd argue that many cars that elevate to classic status do so completely against the tide of rational thinking, often more to do with numbers made, cult following or just plain randomness. But yes, I see what you mean.

I guess the good thing about SAABs is that they are wierd, ugly and kind of odd... hehe

Sterillium

Original Poster:

22,350 posts

246 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
Andy665 said:
That looks lovely OP - best spec and certainly a car Is like to own one day, had the next gen Aero convertible for a while but prefer this 2nd gen model
I still massively regret selling my T16 Saloon.

WJNB

2,637 posts

182 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
Enjoy it & stuff the know-it-all's. Odd & weird is good, shows you have confidence & character.
As you say it's not an MX-5 or worse a Cheapos Eunos which are now far too common.

RemyMartin81D

6,759 posts

226 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
Cupramax said:
You’ve been reading too many Internet forums, have you ever even actually driven one?
Yes ive driven a viggen convertible even with the abbott racing rescue kit and it was er.....eye opening

soad

34,240 posts

197 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
RS4 Convertible?

EazyDuz

2,013 posts

129 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
Reminds me of those old Mk 4 astra convertibles in grey

bobbo89

5,846 posts

166 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
Cupramax said:
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.

Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
You’ve been reading too many Internet forums, have you ever even actually driven one?
I've driven one, a 250bhp one that torque steered like fk and the bulkhead was obviously cracked (pedals move when steering). That said, there are fixes out there for these and they are lovely cars, you just need to mod them properly and do all the right things to handle the extra power you're putting through it!

Nice car BTW OP, always had a soft spot for Saab's and you've made the right decision keeping it as there really isn't anything out there that you could replace it with*

  • e36 328 sport cab maybe?

SCEtoAUX

4,119 posts

102 months

Saturday 14th April 2018
quotequote all
That is a lovely car. I was very tempted to buy something similar recently, but in the end I went with the two seater "not an MX-5" option of another MR2.

I had a 900 convertible years ago (at an age when I needed four seats) and it was wonderful.

gnc

448 posts

136 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
had an mx5 for 10 years, then thought id uprate and get a saab convertable, worst decision ive made in a long time.

Debaser

7,399 posts

282 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
Sterillium said:
It ticks a lot of boxes and I can't think what else would hit the following criteria:

Fast.
Classic looks.
Roofless.
Four seats and a boot.
Reliable.
Comfortable.
Surely a BMW 3 series convertible?

S2r

758 posts

99 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
Volvo C70 ?

Muddle238

4,275 posts

134 months

Sunday 15th April 2018
quotequote all
Sterillium said:
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.

Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
This is a valid point, but I'd argue that many cars that elevate to classic status do so completely against the tide of rational thinking, often more to do with numbers made, cult following or just plain randomness. But yes, I see what you mean.

I guess the good thing about SAABs is that they are wierd, ugly and kind of odd... hehe
Another thing about SAAB is that kids of today who become the petrol heads of tomorrow probably won't have heard of SAAB, or if they have probably won't know much about them. Future generations will take an interest in this extinct marque in the same way I have an interest in manufacturers that no longer exist.

I suspect SAABs will continue to exist for years to come, as enthusiasts keep the brand alive despite the factories being buried a long time ago. Rightly so too, I like SAAB and there is absolutely no harm in keeping nice examples in decent condition for future generations.