It's NOT an MX5...
Discussion
I almost accidentally sold a car last week. I'm good like that... accidental purchases, unplanned selling, stupid whims etc etc. But I made a conscious decision NOT to get rid of a car, because I genuinely don't know what I'd replace it with.
It's nothing special, it's just an old SAAB 93 Aero Convertible. It's in great condition, it has had some under-the-bonnet fettling, extra strut braces a nice stainless steel exhaust system and some kind of magical remapping wizardry that I don't understand, but the result is a very fast, very comfortable and reliable car that I've really enjoyed zooming about in this afternoon whilst the sun was shining.

I know it's not a "classic" yet, but it could heading that way, especially in manual Aero form. But heated seats, iphone connected radio, air con etc make it genuinely useable in all sorts of ways - it has rear seats and a useable boot space too.
It ticks a lot of boxes and I can't think what else would hit the following criteria:
Fast.
Classic looks.
Roofless.
Four seats and a boot.
Reliable.
Comfortable.
Obviously if I remove the "four seats" stipulation an MX5 - although not FAST would fit well (I've had several) but I just can't see another car that would do all these things for the price of one the "bad" MOTs on one of my TVRs.
So I might keep it and slowly bring it back to as near "mint" as I can.
What other cars would you consider to tick these boxes?
Or have you ever kept a car for similarly odd reasons?
It's nothing special, it's just an old SAAB 93 Aero Convertible. It's in great condition, it has had some under-the-bonnet fettling, extra strut braces a nice stainless steel exhaust system and some kind of magical remapping wizardry that I don't understand, but the result is a very fast, very comfortable and reliable car that I've really enjoyed zooming about in this afternoon whilst the sun was shining.

I know it's not a "classic" yet, but it could heading that way, especially in manual Aero form. But heated seats, iphone connected radio, air con etc make it genuinely useable in all sorts of ways - it has rear seats and a useable boot space too.
It ticks a lot of boxes and I can't think what else would hit the following criteria:
Fast.
Classic looks.
Roofless.
Four seats and a boot.
Reliable.
Comfortable.
Obviously if I remove the "four seats" stipulation an MX5 - although not FAST would fit well (I've had several) but I just can't see another car that would do all these things for the price of one the "bad" MOTs on one of my TVRs.
So I might keep it and slowly bring it back to as near "mint" as I can.
What other cars would you consider to tick these boxes?
Or have you ever kept a car for similarly odd reasons?
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.
Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
This is a valid point, but I'd argue that many cars that elevate to classic status do so completely against the tide of rational thinking, often more to do with numbers made, cult following or just plain randomness. But yes, I see what you mean.Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
I guess the good thing about SAABs is that they are wierd, ugly and kind of odd...

Cupramax said:
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.
Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
You’ve been reading too many Internet forums, have you ever even actually driven one?Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.

Nice car BTW OP, always had a soft spot for Saab's and you've made the right decision keeping it as there really isn't anything out there that you could replace it with*
- e36 328 sport cab maybe?
I'd say the W209 CLK 350/500/55 more than fit the bill but you do have a nice Saab there OP.
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201...
Sterillium said:
RemyMartin81D said:
I'd say a car that was notorious for epic scuttle shake and cracking it's bulkhead will never be a classic.
Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
This is a valid point, but I'd argue that many cars that elevate to classic status do so completely against the tide of rational thinking, often more to do with numbers made, cult following or just plain randomness. But yes, I see what you mean.Not a 'rubbish' car but never a classic.
I guess the good thing about SAABs is that they are wierd, ugly and kind of odd...

I suspect SAABs will continue to exist for years to come, as enthusiasts keep the brand alive despite the factories being buried a long time ago. Rightly so too, I like SAAB and there is absolutely no harm in keeping nice examples in decent condition for future generations.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff