RE: Nissan 200SX: Spotted
RE: Nissan 200SX: Spotted
Thursday 5th July 2018

Nissan 200SX: Spotted

A car so beloved by tuners that a standard example has become unique in its own right...



A quick look at the Nissan 200SX/ Silvia section of the PH classifieds confirms the suspicion that an unmolested example is hard to come by. From Rocket Bunny body kits, to Time Attack builds, and even a V8-engined drift car, the 200SX continues to hold appeal as a platform on which petrolheads can realise even the wildest of their Fast and Furious fantasies.

But what if you're looking for a more authentic example? Well that's where today's Spotted steps in. With bodywork in seemingly original condition, and not a bolt-on arch or carbon fibre splitter to be seen, it looks to be in fantastic shape. The engine is described as having recently undergone a "massive overhaul", but that work was assumedly restorative rather than enhancing, given the ad makes no mention of any performance gains and there doesn't appear to be a giant intercooler poking out from behind the bumper... It even has its original wheels, which can't be said for many 200SXs.


Even without modification, though, the 200SX ought to be an enjoyable daily driver. With 200hp going to the rear wheels and a 7,500rpm redline, it's not hard to see how the combination of a 1,316kg kerbweight and five-speed manual make those numbers into a fun way to get around. After all, there's a reason why it's favoured as a starting point for so many tail happy antics...

This particular example may have over 100,000 miles on the clock, but with that recent work done, an MOT, and plenty of documentation, it's £4,500 asking price doesn't seem too unreasonable. The ad is honest about the presence of a little rust on the wheel arches, but even offers to take that into consideration should it not be fixed by the time the car is sold. Sounds like a true PHer. Aside from that, the only blot on the car's copybook is the lack of an interior photo, although given the external attention to detail you'd have to imagine things are pretty tidy inside as well.


All of this assumes, of course, that the next owner will be interested in the car in order to preserve its originality. There may well be more than a few out there with an eye toward a solid foundation on which to base their own project. That would seem a shame, though, given how few untouched examples remain. But then again, they say a species has to evolve or die, and within the genus of turn of the millennium Japanese coupes, few cars have proven better at adapting to their surroundings than the 200SX.


SPECIFICATION: NISSAN 200SX

Engine: 1,998cc 4-cyl turbocharged
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive, LSD
Power (hp): 200@5,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 196@4,800rpm
MPG: 29.1
CO2: 233g/km
First registered: 2000
Recorded mileage: 106,000
Price new: £22,000
Yours for: £4,500

See the full ad here.

Author
Discussion

forzaminardi

Original Poster:

2,298 posts

211 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
I loved these back in the day - this one looks great, in the best colour (imo) also.

If I had a spare £5k I'd be very interested in that. Lovely-looking car.

Butter Face

34,022 posts

184 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
They’re pretty lardy and not particularly fast as standard TBH. A few choice mods really do make them a great car.

I had an S14a and sold it when I moved out because I simply couldn’t afford it anymore, it’s one of my most missed cars.

Standard ones don’t normally stay standard once they change hands, it’ll get bought by someone who wants a clean base to modify.

s m

24,182 posts

227 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
How long before something about the dash/interior being "too plasticky" or similar gets mentioned by a dash-feeler ..... hehe

Do like these - prefer the later front end but had an early one for a weekend and drove them at Donington Park - very entertaining

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Dash / interior is to plasticky imo wink

marksx

5,171 posts

214 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Not a standard exhaust. Engine work was probably a rebuild.

I loved mine, but the rust scared me off.

cptsideways

13,834 posts

276 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
The future MkII Escort

jason61c

5,978 posts

198 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Great GT cars, very very balanced, a lovely drive, very reliable.

I'm not sure about the next mk2 escort comment, its offensive to a 200sx.

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Butter Face said:
They’re pretty lardy.....
Only approx. 50kg heavier than a Fiesta St with similar power - would you call the Fiesta lardy?

Carfield

319 posts

195 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
I loved mine - bought at 5 years old with 9000 miles on it. Completely standard, because (despite how easy they are to modify), they don't really need it unless you want to go M3 baiting.

Nice balance, certainly requires care if it's wet.

They are not really slow as standard, the quoted 0-60 was 7.5 seconds, but there was general agreement (on the main SX forum at least) that Nissan had underplayed that a bit to keep the insurance down. Certainly it was possible to time something in the mid sevens without theatrics or threatening the clutch, and at least one of the magazines (maybe Autocar) got their test car into the high 6s. I remember playing with a Cooper S, E36 328 and other quickish stuff of the time without being shown up, and it could certainly surprise many if you did a bit of planning and were ready on-boost.

My most missed car.

Rust definitely an issue then, let alone now! Paint extremely delicate (at least the black was) so I would have thought that most would have needed bodywork by now.

Gez79

239 posts

207 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
MOT history isn't good. Failed last year with serious structural rust and a poor repair and MOT is up again in November.

Also failed the year before for, amongst other things, tyres being down to the cords. Never a sign of fastidious owner imho.


cerb4.5lee

41,823 posts

204 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
I absolutely loved mine and kept it for 4 years, its still the best car I've had in terms of fun/usable performance even now. Standard they're a little tame but once modded a little bit it totally transforms them.

I still keep toying with getting another and I used to love the almost Q car appeal of them. Everyone that had a go in mine couldn't believe how quick it was. I love them.


Jonny_gti

291 posts

104 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Seems decent value as prices only going one way on these now, it is pretty nice to see one standard for a change.

Opel 400R

3 posts

157 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Yeah these cars were really something special.......if a little under the radar at the time of the launch.

The handling (although soft with wheels to narrow from the factory), was a joy of on limit communication to the driver. It was never as fast as any of the rally specials that were coming out at the time but it had great looks and high speed stability. I had one for 8 years and put 100K on it, completely reliable and always made every journey fun.

I sold it like a fool 8 years ago and having driven lots of interesting cars since none ever replaced the 200sx...so much so that last year I bought another one as a project. Hopefully its as good as I remember!!

cerb4.5lee

41,823 posts

204 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
Opel 400R said:
Yeah these cars were really something special.......if a little under the radar at the time of the launch.
The reviews of them at the time were always complimentary but still nobody bought them. I got mine at 18 month old and remember going to the main dealer every 6month/6k miles for an oil change...which seemed excessive.

I had the Norris Designs stage 1 conversion put on mine and while it was only around 40bhp extra, the boost was up a fair bit and it always shot flames out of its decatted stainless mongoose exhaust! biggrin

I remember mine being terrible on fuel...not helped by me planting it everywhere! driving

All the best with yours. thumbup

kambites

70,824 posts

245 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
That's a lovely colour.

greenarrow

4,502 posts

141 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
These were pretty handy out of the box. I had a Top Gear magazine in the 1990s where Tiff Needell raced the 200SX, Fiat Coupe Turbo and Honda Prelude VTI around Thruxton. The Nissan was 2 seconds quicker than the Fiat Coupe as I recall and looking at other similar track tests during the same era involving Tiff and Thruxton, also quicker than the DC2 Integra Type R. I always wished I had bought one. Nissan really have produced some great drivers cars over the years...

s m

24,182 posts

227 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I
I still keep toying with getting another and I used to love the almost Q car appeal of them. Everyone that had a go in mine couldn't believe how quick it was. I love them.
330i performance as standard a good 6 years before they came out - plus easy to make really quick....although someone will be along to tell us how a 320 diesel is the same these days!

greenarrow

4,502 posts

141 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
s m said:
cerb4.5lee said:
I
I still keep toying with getting another and I used to love the almost Q car appeal of them. Everyone that had a go in mine couldn't believe how quick it was. I love them.
330i performance as standard a good 6 years before they came out - plus easy to make really quick....although someone will be along to tell us how a 320 diesel is the same these days!
Without having my Autocar handy, 0-100 in 15.4 seconds comes to mind - I may be wrong, I'll check later.... which makes it quicker than 330 performance. Think Mk1 Impreza Turbo performance. A 320d will only match it if dropped over a big cliff!

ianwayne

7,971 posts

292 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
I liked these over 10 yrs ago, but the relentless dedication to them surprises me, when a newer Nissan 350Z is much faster as standard for the same money.

Butter Face

34,022 posts

184 months

Thursday 5th July 2018
quotequote all
had ham said:
Butter Face said:
They’re pretty lardy.....
Only approx. 50kg heavier than a Fiesta St with similar power - would you call the Fiesta lardy?
I'll change my wording. They feel lardy (IMO). They are a tourer rather than a sports car, they don't feel very agile as standard. Of course, decent suspension and alignment makes all the difference.