Engine Sizes
Author
Discussion

PugwasHDJ80

Original Poster:

7,679 posts

251 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Its seems very common that a actual engine sizes are very often just under the nominal size, but very rarely just over

ie our V90 has a 2.0l engine, which is actually 1969cc. It would be unusual to have an engine that was 2020cc

Is there a reason for this?

crofty1984

17,064 posts

234 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Historically in some cases racing classes (and tax classes, see 2 litre Ferrari V8) would have had an effect on this.

Peanut Gallery

2,723 posts

140 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Tax,

Engines over each size fit into the next tax bracket, your car would have been a higer tax bracket if it was 2L exactly.

On the other hand, my Citreon GS Club was 1,222 or something, as the car needed to be more that 1,2L to go onto a motorway.

Alex_225

7,785 posts

231 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
My CLS63 is nearer a 6.2 than a 6.3 but I believe historically the V8 it was a homage to was a 6.3. I may be wrong.

Didn't Ford used to put a 1.25 engine in the late 90s/early 00's Fiestas but it was classed as a 1.2?

JakeT

5,997 posts

150 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Alex_225 said:
My CLS63 is nearer a 6.2 than a 6.3 but I believe historically the V8 it was a homage to was a 6.3. I may be wrong.

Didn't Ford used to put a 1.25 engine in the late 90s/early 00's Fiestas but it was classed as a 1.2?
1,242cc, so it rounded down to a 1.2.

CanAm

14,004 posts

302 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Peanut Gallery said:
On the other hand, my Citreon GS Club was 1,222 or something, as the car needed to be more that 1,2L to go onto a motorway.
In France??

thebigmacmoomin

2,918 posts

199 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
My Focus ST Mk2 is a 2.5 but its 2522cc

thebigmacmoomin

2,918 posts

199 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Alex_225 said:
Didn't Ford used to put a 1.25 engine in the late 90s/early 00's Fiestas but it was classed as a 1.2?
They did call some Fiesta's the 1.25 rather than 1.2

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

193 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
FIAT Barchettas are registered as 1.8s,with 1747cc.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,020 posts

265 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
TVR 4.5 Rover V8 is 4,546

But, what I don't understand is why have engines in the UK traditionally been measured in CC, even when everything was imperial?

CanAm

14,004 posts

302 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
TVR 4.5 Rover V8 is 4,546

But, what I don't understand is why have engines in the UK traditionally been measured in CC, even when everything was imperial?
They haven't; they used to be referred to by (RAC) h.p., eg Austin 7, as these were taxation classes.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,020 posts

265 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
CanAm said:
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
TVR 4.5 Rover V8 is 4,546

But, what I don't understand is why have engines in the UK traditionally been measured in CC, even when everything was imperial?
They haven't; they used to be referred to by (RAC) h.p., eg Austin 7, as these were taxation classes.
Yep, but I meant engine sizes in CC rather than imperial.

ruhall

578 posts

176 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Rover V8 3.5 was 3528cc, 3.9 was 3946cc (or sometimes ststed as 3950cc). As was the 4.0 wink

Mercedes' original A160CDi was 1689cc (as was the A170CDi, just to provide some BBC balance biggrin).

Edited by ruhall on Thursday 31st October 19:06

foxbody-87

2,675 posts

196 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Ford used to badge cars fitted with its 302ci engine as 5.0s. In reality they were 4.9 litre but that doesn't look as good

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
Yep, but I meant engine sizes in CC rather than imperial.
Ah yes, the evocatively-named "Bentley 140 fluid ounce"smile

legless

2,038 posts

170 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
I've had a couple that were rounded down rather than up.

The Ford 2.9 Cologne V6 was 2,933cc, and the Volvo 2.4 D5 was 2,401cc (which handily put it into the 'above 2,400cc diesel' category for my work mileage claims, which was worth another 12p/mile hehe)

Peanut Gallery

2,723 posts

140 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
CanAm said:
Peanut Gallery said:
On the other hand, my Citreon GS Club was 1,222 or something, as the car needed to be more that 1,2L to go onto a motorway.
In France??
Rhodesia, but for the South Africa market, I believe.

Rozzers

3,056 posts

105 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
Renaults AxM 1.6 engine was 1647cc....

Gtom

1,892 posts

162 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
I can remember years ago when the government decided cars under 1100cc would get cheaper road tax. My old man was very happy about this until he found out the metro he had got for my mum was 1120cc (I think) so he had to pay the higher amount.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 31st October 2019
quotequote all
In some instances of taxation-defined limits, the nominal swept volume was arranged such that the maximum excursion under allowable tolerances (including maximum re-bore size) was still just under the limit.