RE: Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca | Spotted
RE: Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca | Spotted
Thursday 7th May 2020

Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca | Spotted

Thought the modern Mustangs of note begin with the GT350s? Think again...



Although Ford seemingly tried as hard as it could over 25 years to tarnish the Mustang name between the seventies and the nineties, it did have the good sense to protect a few of its most iconic names. Nowhere better is that evidenced than with this car, a Mustang Boss 302, which resurrected in 2012 a name that hadn't been seen for more than four decades.

The Boss 302 of 1969-1970 was, as you'd hope for a car with such an imposing name, quite the prospect. The 'Hi-Po' small-block race 5.0-litre, not to be confused with regular Mustang V8s of the time, was dropped from an SCCA Trans Am car into a street vehicle. Along with chassis and aerodynamic upgrades aimed at track driving, alongside an infamous cosmetic makeover, the Boss 302 became a Mustang legend.

With the name untouched (and therefore unsullied) for so long, it was pleasing to see the 21st century Boss 302 follow a similar path to the original. While no longer required for homologation, it also received a raft of engine, body and chassis changes to equip it for circuit driving. So, the Coyote V8 was upgraded to such an extent that it became known as the 'Roadrunner' V8; it was treated to hot cams, an intake from the 302R racer and ported heads. The Boss 302 lost 10 lb ft over a standard Mustang 5.0, but gained 32hp thanks to those tweaks, for a nice, round 450hp. Even better, it was made at 7,400rpm, which is only 100rpm less than where the newest, flat-plane-cranked GT350R makes its peak.


With new anti-roll bars, lowered springs and adjustable dampers, as well as set of jazzy graphics, the Boss 302 was deemed a worthy remake of the original. PH in fact drove a Boss 302 over here early in the 2010s. praising its "fabulously impressive" handling, "lovely, incisive steering" and "beautiful" gearchange; so it was pretty good, and just for the sake of this feature we'll overlook the bump absorbing abilities of the live rear axle...

This car. however, is not a Boss 302 - it's something even more special. The Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca Edition further upped the track cred, ditching the rear seats, adding a strut brace, a Torsen limited-slip diff, lighter wheels, stickier tyres and even more aggressive aero - it even had a naff colour scheme, like all the best circuit specials. This video shows the Mustang lapping the circuit it was named after in 1:41, which is faster than an F-Type R, Aston V12 Vantage and Lexus RC F (with a manual, don't forget); another source as it down as 1:39.5, which would make it faster than a 997 GT3...

Whether that last point is true or not is by-the-by; the Boss 302 LSE is a quick car on a racetrack, by most measures. It's a rare one, too, with just 750 made by Ford across the 2012 and 2013 model years. To come across one in the UK, then, is quite the find, especially with just 1,500 miles.


Stored in a collection from new, Boss 302 #154 of 750 has nevertheless been cared for, with half a dozen main dealer services having occurred since its Ford PDI in April 2012. Obviously, the same issues apply here as they do for any of the US track day renegades - left-hand drive, the sheer size, grinding out spoilers on pebbles - but this Mustang does look an exceptional example of the breed.

Too good to discover what the fuss is about? Perhaps, even if the temptation would never truly ebb away given the spec. At £50k the Boss faces innumerable rivals, of course, for the daily driver that could also hunt apexes for hour after hour; it's hard to imagine any, however, with quite the presence, the history, or the soundtrack. See you in the paddock.


SPECIFICATION | FORD MUSTANG BOSS 302 LAGUNA SECA EDITION
Engine:
4,951cc, V8
Transmission: Six-speed manual, rear-wheel drive, limited-slip differential
Power (hp): 450@7,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 380@4,500rpm
MPG: Ha
CO2: Ha ha
First registered: 2012
Recorded mileage: 1,500
Price then: c. £42,000 (importing a standard Boss 302 in 2011)
Price now: £49,995

See the original advert here


Author
Discussion

McRors

Original Poster:

406 posts

76 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
While I like a bit of American muscle - recent Camaros especially- this Mustang looks like something straight out of Max Power magazine. This or Aston Martin Vantage? No choice really.

MikeT66

2,693 posts

144 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
I'd love a Mustang... but just not this one.

Venturist

3,472 posts

215 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Those graphics especially the wheels make it an instant No.

Also 1500 miles? That’s a shame, was there something wrong with it? I hope he’s offering a worthwhile discount vs a good example.

MikeT66

2,693 posts

144 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Venturist said:
Those graphics especially the wheels make it an instant No.

Also 1500 miles? That’s a shame, was there something wrong with it? I hope he’s offering a worthwhile discount vs a good example.
I think I can see what's wrong with it... biggrin

Kawasicki

14,020 posts

255 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Drove one...it was fun...the engine is glorious.

A1VDY

3,575 posts

147 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Hideous thing, the name also. 'Laguna Seca' wtf is that all about.
The Mustang has been done to death, coming from a sleek looking original to a massive overweight blob of a car. Guy in the village near to me has one, not good to drive and really is too big (wide) for UK roads especially B or C roads.
I used to have one albeit a 2.3 turbo with carb circa 1981 model (HOC 8W) but that at least was very much smaller..

Edited by A1VDY on Thursday 7th May 06:54

M22s

590 posts

169 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
I’m struggling to tell from the article, if that’s how it left the factory... either way, looks horrific *facepalm*

Ritchie335is

2,011 posts

222 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
A1VDY said:
Hideous thing, the name also. 'Laguna Seca' wtf is that all about.
The Mustang has been done to death, coming from a sleek looking original to a massive overweight blob of a car. Guy in the village near to me has one, not good to drive and really is too big (wide) for UK roads especially B or C roads.
I used to have one albeit a 2.3 turbo with carb circa 1981 model (HOC 8W) but that at least was very much smaller..

Edited by A1VDY on Thursday 7th May 06:54
Same length as an E39 M5 also lighter with more power.

So hardly an overweight blob.

I'll give you it is slightly wide at 100mm wider then the M5 IIRC but far from bad to drive.

ExPat2B

2,159 posts

220 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Whilst I am sure it is very fast around a track, the cost of consumables like brakes, tyres and fuel is going to make running it as a track car very very expensive, completely out of proportion to its actual performance.

Augustus Windsock

3,692 posts

175 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
On the face of it, sounds like it should cut the mustard, performance-wise, as long as you can stand the running costs.
But the exterior goes to show that you can’t buy, and Americans apparently don’t do, class.
As a ‘cut-price’ 996 GT3 it just may appeal to some, but don’t be fooled, there are several such models advertised on PH at this price point and I know which I’d rather have...

AndySheff

6,810 posts

227 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
If only they made it with the steering wheel on the right side ! rolleyes

powerstroke

10,283 posts

180 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
I don't think anyone so far has got what this is !!, I would but those wheels would be going into storage however and I think checking to see if the decal kits are still avalable before I pulled them off ,
The laguna Seca was one of the boss 302 range at the time , the others had the full race recaro's and rear seat delete ,
torsen diff etc on the option list but all had the glorious hand built free revving N/A V8 ...

Veeayt

3,139 posts

225 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
A1VDY said:
Hideous thing, the name also. 'Laguna Seca' wtf is that all about.
Thus Ford celebrated the fact that this version was faster than contemporary E92 M3 around 'Seca

A1VDY

3,575 posts

147 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
powerstroke said:
I don't think anyone so far has got what this is !!, I would but those wheels would be going into storage however and I think checking to see if the decal kits are still avalable before I pulled them off ,
The laguna Seca was one of the boss 302 range at the time , the others had the full race recaro's and rear seat delete ,
torsen diff etc on the option list but all had the glorious hand built free revving N/A V8 ...
Re the decal kits, there can be as many as you like, any competent sign maker will cut them..

coppice

9,434 posts

164 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
How times change - the Mustang was a new concept with a new name on its debut in 1964 , and it looked like nothing else.
Fast forward 50 odd years and the latest iteration is yet another attempt to plunder a past which most of its target market will only know about from stuff like this .(see also Bullitt , Ford GT , anything with Gulf livery ) .

It would have been insane for Fomoco in the 60s to recycle the names of past glories -imagine calling a new car the Model T in the Sixties . Why has the industry become so mired in a mythical version of the past, with so many sports cars being tribute acts to their younger selves ? Sure the Mustang looks nice enough, apart from the silly paint , , and I'm sure it goes like a rocket compared to its original version but put it near a 1970 302 and it'd look a bloated parody . As did the 302 in comparison to a GT350 from 1966 . ...

sidesauce

2,967 posts

238 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
coppice said:
Why has the industry become so mired in a mythical version of the past, with so many sports cars being tribute acts to their younger selves?
Because nostalgia sells, that's why.

emperorburger

1,484 posts

86 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all

V88Dicky

7,359 posts

203 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Ritchie335is said:
A1VDY said:
Hideous thing, the name also. 'Laguna Seca' wtf is that all about.
The Mustang has been done to death, coming from a sleek looking original to a massive overweight blob of a car. Guy in the village near to me has one, not good to drive and really is too big (wide) for UK roads especially B or C roads.
I used to have one albeit a 2.3 turbo with carb circa 1981 model (HOC 8W) but that at least was very much smaller..

Edited by A1VDY on Thursday 7th May 06:54
Same length as an E39 M5 also lighter with more power.

So hardly an overweight blob.

I'll give you it is slightly wide at 100mm wider then the M5 IIRC but far from bad to drive.
Current Mustang 4784 x 2080
Current Mondeo 4871 x 2121

Why people mention that the Mustang is 'too big for British roads' is beyond me. Next time Enterprise drop me off a Mondeo I'd best ask for something smaller in case I can't fit down a B road hehe

BillyB

1,432 posts

278 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
Agreed. I drove one round twisty C roads and it didn’t feel problematically large.

V88Dicky said:
Current Mustang 4784 x 2080
Current Mondeo 4871 x 2121

Why people mention that the Mustang is 'too big for British roads' is beyond me. Next time Enterprise drop me off a Mondeo I'd best ask for something smaller in case I can't fit down a B road hehe

cerb4.5lee

40,147 posts

200 months

Thursday 7th May 2020
quotequote all
I love Mustangs but this looks a bit pony to my eyes. I do still fall for the Recaro seats and the 5 Litre V8 though. cool