Insuring a PCP financed car
Discussion
interstellar said:
The car belongs to you on a pcp so it’s your car and you will have the v5. Can’t be any more straightforward.
Insurance will be normal
Hmm, this article suggests otherwise.Insurance will be normal
https://www.parkers.co.uk/car-finance/advice/pcp-i...
interstellar said:
The car belongs to you on a pcp so it’s your car and you will have the v5. Can’t be any more straightforward.
Insurance will be normal
The car is property of the finance company as it would be on HP.Insurance will be normal
OP, you simply insure the car as you as the owner and registered keeper. In the event of total loss you would be responsible for paying any excess money not covered by the insurance company.
Edit: you can absolutely try explaining to your insurance company that you’re not technically the owner but I doubt they will understand (or care). If the car was to be written off they will simply pay any balance straight to the finance co anyway as it is very clearly marked on HPI they hold a financial interest in the car which the insurer will see.
Edited by The Rotrex Kid on Friday 4th September 06:48
The Rotrex Kid said:
The car is property of the finance company as it would be on HP.
OP, you simply insure the car as you as the owner and registered keeper. In the event of total loss you would be responsible for paying any excess money not covered by the insurance company.
Indeed, the finance company own the car. This article is interesting too.OP, you simply insure the car as you as the owner and registered keeper. In the event of total loss you would be responsible for paying any excess money not covered by the insurance company.
My concern is the validity of the insurance in the first place.
https://www.creditplus.co.uk/blog/legal-ownership/
From memory the comparison sites ask two separate questions for registered keeper / owner, on PCP the finance company is the owner until the final payment is made.
I think my PCP is down as a private lease after having this discussion with the insurer, for what it's worth it made no difference to the price of cover.
ETA: Presumably the fact you are RK would differentiate it from a traditional lease agreement.
I think my PCP is down as a private lease after having this discussion with the insurer, for what it's worth it made no difference to the price of cover.
ETA: Presumably the fact you are RK would differentiate it from a traditional lease agreement.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Agreed. You insure the car, for its value, as you would if you owned it outright. No different to a scenario, where you might have taken out a large bank loan to purchase it.Either way, the car is registered in your name.
In the even of a total loss, the insurance company will only pay you its worth at that time, but your finance agreement/bank loan still stands, and you will owe the fall amount payable to that finance/loan provider.
To mitigate those (potential) shortfalls in value vs amount owed, people take out gap insurance in the initial years, to cover an deficit between the two until the cars value and outstanding finance achieve a level of parity.
BeMo said:
From memory the comparison sites ask two separate questions for registered keeper / owner, on PCP the finance company is the owner until the final payment is made.
I think my PCP is down as a private lease after having this discussion with the insurer, for what it's worth it made no difference to the price of cover.
ETA: Presumably the fact you are RK would differentiate it from a traditional lease agreement.
Cheers, this is what the insurers agreed so I'm comfortable with that.I think my PCP is down as a private lease after having this discussion with the insurer, for what it's worth it made no difference to the price of cover.
ETA: Presumably the fact you are RK would differentiate it from a traditional lease agreement.
Now the exciting bit!
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


