RE: Land Rover Discovery 3 V8 | Spotted

RE: Land Rover Discovery 3 V8 | Spotted

Wednesday 30th March 2022

Land Rover Discovery 3 V8 | Spotted

Miss the good old days? This'll take you back...



Even 50 years since the first Range Rover, nothing suits a big Land Rover product quite like a V8 engine. There's even one crammed into the new Defender. And a BMW-made one coming to the next-generation Range Rover. And also why the old V8 diesel was so popular wherever it was installed, combining effortless performance with fuel consumption (slightly) less ruinous than the petrol equivalent.

The Land Rover Discovery has never been available with the V8 diesel - what a machine that might have been - and while the Discovery 4's 3.0-litre V6 diesel was a fine motor, the 3 had to make do with the 2.7 version. Which did struggle somewhat with lugging around 2.5 tonnes of Disco. It had a sturdy 328lb ft to accompany around 190hp, but it's hard to imagine anyone lusting after a TDV6 in years to come, however worthy it once was. The V8, on the other hand...

The 4.4-litre Discovery was a tough sell even when petrol wasn't approaching £2 a litre. This was the mid-2000s, remember, when diesel was king - with tax and fuel prices to reflect that. The V8 was more expensive to buy and to run than the TDV6, with only a modest - if noticeable - uplift in performance. Its fate was sealed, really, before Land Rover even conceded that only around 10 per cent of sales in Europe would use the engine.



Which isn't to say it was bad. One review praised power delivery "smoother than a James Bond one-liner" as well as the V8 being "wonderfully resonant up to the 6,000rpm change-up point." With everything that made the Discovery 3 such a gamechanger for SUVs, of course. As has so often been the case, the diesel made the most sense - but the V8's charm was plain to see. Even though few sold, it's easy to imagine some contented owners rumbling around.

This one, unsurprisingly, is the only V8 Discovery 3 on PH. Looks good, doesn't it? Particularly so given a six-figure mileage, and the fact that the car made its debut almost 18 years ago. As a 55-plated Disco it will avoid the punitive tax applied to cars after March 2006, and the lighter leather brightens up what can be quite an austere cabin. The condition of the wheels, paint and leather suggests this has lived a life of road use; what a way to rack up the miles it must have been.

Now the V8 is for sale at £12,500; far from the cheapest Disco 3 out there, though it is the most affordable petrol-powered Discovery on the PH classifieds - if that helps your cause. (Of the 945 currently for sale, just 20 aren't diesel, or a little more than two per cent.) Of course a V8 Discovery is going to cost a small fortune to run; it always has and it always will. But every mile would likely be a satisfying and memorable one. Especially when you're surrounded by ditch water-dull battery-powered SUVs. Just remember to ask your passengers for petrol money.


SPECIFICATION | LAND ROVER DISCOVERY 3 V8

Engine: 4,394cc, V8
Transmission: 6-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 295@ 5,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 313@ 4,000rpm
CO2: 18ish
MPG: 354g/km
Recorded mileage: 106,000
Year registered: 2005
Price new: c. £50k
Yours for: £12,500

See the original advert here


Author
Discussion

Mysstree

Original Poster:

477 posts

48 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
The ugliest Discovery made. The rear quarter and back look like an added on afterthought as if the original designer had given up and handed over to someone else to finish off.
Saving grace is that at least its not got a swoopy coupe roofline so should have lots of height in the rear and unlike the new Lotus and most other recent SUV’s there is a decent amount of window area.

Edited by Mysstree on Wednesday 30th March 06:38

Motormouth88

270 posts

62 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
Are you nuts? The latest discovery is an utter monstrosity in comparison to this.

Portofino

4,344 posts

193 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
Still a handsome car for me & definitely not the ugliest.

Each to their own though.


Numeric

1,413 posts

153 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
I got to drive one a few times in the UK including offroad and it was a good vehicle, though not as quick as one might imagine considering the fuel consumption, it was replaced with a well specked 4 TDV6 and it was chalk and cheese.

For a car that essentially had so much of the look, the 4 was magnificent in comparison to the 3 and the big diesel engine seemed so much better than the V8 in this application. I'm not sure why you would get this rather than try and find a 4 as the fuel consumption will offset any price saving, but maybe they are more reliable or something?




Edited by Numeric on Wednesday 30th March 07:04

HughG

3,555 posts

243 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
My BiL has one of these with LPG which is excellent. Makes a nice noise, will pick its skirt up when needed, and tows effortlessly.

coded2112

166 posts

223 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
At least it looks like it as was actually designed to have a swoop, rather than the 5 which looks like they just stuck the number plate in the wrong place!

And it has a V8, I quite like this model!!

British Beef

2,258 posts

167 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all

IN times of old, this would be a £4-5 k shed by now, with that mileage.

I see zero appeal in this car at that price:

1. 16 years old, plenty to go wrong and need fixing
2. 106k miles, see point 1.
3. Landrover, complicated mechanicals and electronics, see point 1.
4. Huge running costs, petrol and tax

Only redeeming feature over diesel, is great v8 noise.

ducnick

1,834 posts

245 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
I really can’t see the point of this one (in the U.K.)
There are hundreds of L322 range rovers for sale with similar mileage, with either 3.6 tdv8 or petrol v8 for this money if you really must have a complicated, uneconomical, unreliable, large 4x4. Likewise a quick search throws up many disco 4’s with the tdv6 and similar miles for the same of less money.

The only reason to buy a disco3 over a disco4 or L322 is if they are significantly cheaper to purchase as the l322 is the more modern design, lighter and more comfortable, and the disco 4 is more reliable, more modern and more efficient.

Edited by ducnick on Wednesday 30th March 08:18

Triumph Man

8,758 posts

170 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
I just don't like the interior of the Disco 3, which is partly why I have a 4! With these things you want torque, and although in the 3 the diesel and the V8 are about level pegging for torque, but the 4 with the 3.0L engine has 50% more than this V8. It is a shame Land Rover didn't put the TDV8 in the Discoveries - they would have been some machines!

rastapasta

1,885 posts

140 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
These things were really good family cars. Cavernous room and one of the first cars to be able to fit three of the current generation of isofix type childrens armchairs across the back

wpa1975

9,122 posts

116 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
So much better looking than the latest Discovery but not sure if buying this V8 makes sense with fuel prices at the moment.

Quhet

2,446 posts

148 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
These seem to have aged very very well. No way does that look like a 16 year old motor

J4CKO

41,847 posts

202 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
Are you nuts? The latest discovery is an utter monstrosity in comparison to this.
Yeah, our next door neighbours buy a grey Disco very three years, remember wrinkling my nose on seeing the new one after the late one of this sort of shape, its kind of ugly and much less distinctive.

But, a V8 2.5 ton 17 year old Discovery, 12 and a half grand, funny how even normally largely unwanted stuff commands a high price, its not like its even that low mileage, though it does look in good order to be fair.

I bet something like this is low to mid teens MPG knocking about, even the diesel ones are pretty tragic on fuel. Even before it would be a hard sell but at the moment just not sure who would want it, unless it was a lot cheaper and they could LPG it, if thats even still a thing.

£8 to travel 15 or 16 miles in an ancient SUV ?

Triumph Man

8,758 posts

170 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
rastapasta said:
These things were really good family cars. Cavernous room and one of the first cars to be able to fit three of the current generation of isofix type childrens armchairs across the back
As I say I've got a Disco 4 which is effectively a reworked 3. I bought it before my Wife got pregnant, but it's really proving its worth as a family car.

PartsMonkey

315 posts

139 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
Exterior looks good for 16 years old and these are generally more reliable than the 2.7 and 3.0 TDV6 as the crankshaft doesn't snap at random intervals.

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
I get that the 2.7d is utterly overmatched by the gargantuan weight of these things, but the answer is to get a car that isn't ridiculous, not to waste a V8 in it for marginal performance gains and catastrophically bad fuel consumption.

This car reminds me of the book Harrison Bergeron where anyone with any talent or ability was hobbled in some way to "level the playing field". In this case on of the nicest quad cam V8s of the time that would have been truly delightful in a 1600KG XJ8 or an an XK was saddled with dragging around 2.7 tons of MILF float to make it perform like a 1.6 TDi in a Golf.

trevalvole

1,092 posts

35 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
Does this have the Jag or BMW V8?

camel_landy

4,954 posts

185 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
trevalvole said:
Does this have the Jag or BMW V8?
Jag.

M

camel_landy

4,954 posts

185 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
stickleback123 said:
I get that the 2.7d is utterly overmatched by the gargantuan weight of these things...
The 2.7 is fine... Just adjust your driving to suit. It's a car that isn't built for speed and that 2.7 chugs along quite nicely.

FWIW - On one of the few occasions I drove one of these, I was glad I had a fuel card as once full, it indicated a range of 220 miles!!

M

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 30th March 2022
quotequote all
An automotive dead-end on the tree of life, but am sure it will be a comfortable place to move around in.
Mind you, 220 miles on a full tank would be a bit of a distraction