RE: New Civic Type R breaks old Type R lap record
RE: New Civic Type R breaks old Type R lap record
Thursday 7th April 2022

New Civic Type R breaks old Type R lap record

Honda takes the Suzuka lap record very seriously; seems the latest model is up to snuff


 

Unlike most next-generation models, it's fair to say our biggest hope for the new Honda Civic Type R is that it essentially mimic what the last car did. Sure, it'll look a bit different (probably not a bad thing) but the outgoing hatchback was so downright lovely to drive in virtually all conditions that we'd probably be content for the manufacturer to make no effort at all in tweaking its dynamic attributes. These were class-leading last year; no reason to think they wouldn't be now.

But that's not how Honda works. Especially when it comes to the Type R, one of the few cars which still permits its engineers to stretch their go-faster legs. Hence the fanfare surrounding its new front-drive lap record at Suzuka, a record previously help by the outgoing Limited Edition variant. Setting a new benchmark during the final development phase was doubtless a key internal target - after all, Honda has been sending performance cars round there for 60 years.

 

Nevertheless, it's probably a good sign that its 2mins 23.1secs record is just a 0.873 second improvement over its predecessor. It suggests that Honda has been carefully refining its current formula rather than fitting a nitrous switch. Helpfully, the manufacturer has already confirmed that the Type R will be unsullied by hybrid assistance (unlike the rest of the new lineup) which makes it the last bastion of the VTEC-engined Civic.

Whether or not it has opted to mildly upgrade the output of the 320hp 2.0-litre unit remains to be seen. Again, we'd settle for a repeat performance. Although if Honda has any ambition for setting another benchmark - say, the FWD lap record at the Nurburgring (another title its predecessor once held) - you'd imagine it needing a bit more straight-line speed. But that's for another day. For now we just know the new Type R is no slouch at Suzuka. Expect full details on everything else come summertime.








Author
Discussion

fioravanti

Original Poster:

46 posts

173 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
For me this solves the one problem I had with the outgoing Type R - the looks. One of those rare cars I want to buy brand new.

3795mpower

508 posts

160 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Wheel arches look good and it looks like they’ve toned
Down the looks in general.
That’s a win win,

Rinkay

9 posts

152 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Seems odd that the development car would be LHD? Bigger LHD market perhaps?

Either way, it looks much better at first glance than the old one to me, and seems to have the pace to match. I look forward to seeing one in the wild.

jimAtr

55 posts

234 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Rinkay said:
Seems odd that the development car would be LHD? Bigger LHD market perhaps?
Most of the previous generation were sold in the US and this new car will be built in the US too, makes sense it is LHD

Francis2020

34 posts

71 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Let's hope it helps to soften the FK8 values...
I can't afford this new one but hope a few part ex etc help me finally get the outgoing model!

Ultrafunkula

1,022 posts

135 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
From the front it looks a bit like a 90's Nissan Primera. I quite like it, much better than the FK8.

RacerMike

4,974 posts

241 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Does look good. As always I have questions on their lap times. You can quite easily work out the scale on the G Meter by doing a simple distance over time measurement under braking since they provide a highly accurate timer to 3 decimal places and a speed display. As you might expect, the second chaplet is 1.0g (the guy never really attacks the brakes that hard, but he does sustain quite a nice constant brake event into the final chicane). This is easily derived from the fact he loses 27.78m/s in 2.542s. This is where the G Ball sits (just ever so slightly above the line where our calculated G is about 1.07g).



We can therefore reliably say that he's peaking at 1.5g in the corners and sustaining close to 1.4g. That's right up there at Cup2 R/Slick levels of grip and the bouncing and turn in you can see in the video is very reminiscent of a competition tyre.




Of course, it's all arbitrary really. It's just willy waving. But it does annoy me a little bit as 'optimising' a car is one thing, but bolting on a set of slicks (or 'pre production sample compound Bridgestones' as I'm sure they'd claim) is somewhat disingenuous.

If they do offer the car on Cup2 Rs or even better, if Brigestone have developed a competitive tyre in the ultra high performance track tyre category, then I will quite happily eat my spreadsheet.

geeks

11,804 posts

169 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Anyone else notice the entry to Degna 1 almost went very wrong at about 57s?

Wab1974uk

1,419 posts

57 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
fioravanti said:
For me this solves the one problem I had with the outgoing Type R.
Agreed. But that rear Spoiler kind of spoils it though. Probably does nothing at road speeds either.

A GT spec without the spoiler would probably be the sweet spot

ChrisCh86

1,133 posts

74 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Much better looking than it's predecessor (with all of those horrible fake vents). A shame it's not made in Japan!

Should be a cracking drive given that it's an evolution of the FK8

pacdes

785 posts

191 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
It'll have about 'one' ... 'uno' ... '1' ... more horsepower than the last. Don't expect Honda to give the public what they want over what they think they deserve.

spikyone

1,916 posts

130 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
Much better looking than it's predecessor (with all of those horrible fake vents). A shame it's not made in Japan!

Should be a cracking drive given that it's an evolution of the FK8
I know I'm going against the grain, but I think it's far less interesting to look at than the FK8 and worse for it. Does anyone genuinely think the new one is actually nice looking, or is it just a dislike of the old one? It's nowhere near as bonkers looking as the previous gen but hardly praiseworthy in its own right. I'll take those divisive looks over blandness any day.

As for the vents, although a common criticism they were on the entire range of Civics, not just the Type R.

re33

359 posts

194 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
Does look good. As always I have questions on their lap times. You can quite easily work out the scale on the G Meter by doing a simple distance over time measurement under braking since they provide a highly accurate timer to 3 decimal places and a speed display. As you might expect, the second chaplet is 1.0g (the guy never really attacks the brakes that hard, but he does sustain quite a nice constant brake event into the final chicane). This is easily derived from the fact he loses 27.78m/s in 2.542s. This is where the G Ball sits (just ever so slightly above the line where our calculated G is about 1.07g).



We can therefore reliably say that he's peaking at 1.5g in the corners and sustaining close to 1.4g. That's right up there at Cup2 R/Slick levels of grip and the bouncing and turn in you can see in the video is very reminiscent of a competition tyre.




Of course, it's all arbitrary really. It's just willy waving. But it does annoy me a little bit as 'optimising' a car is one thing, but bolting on a set of slicks (or 'pre production sample compound Bridgestones' as I'm sure they'd claim) is somewhat disingenuous.

If they do offer the car on Cup2 Rs or even better, if Brigestone have developed a competitive tyre in the ultra high performance track tyre category, then I will quite happily eat my spreadsheet.
Does 1g max under braking not show that the 1.4g is not real? Either sensor or gauge is fudged.

KPB1973

938 posts

129 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
geeks said:
Anyone else notice the entry to Degna 1 almost went very wrong at about 57s?
Yes, I had a vicarious pucker moment right about then, too.

I'm really tempted by one of these. Subject to it being able to handle a labrador, which i'm doubtful about, I might even go down from 2 cars to 1 (335i touring and 987.2) for one.

RacerMike

4,974 posts

241 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
re33 said:
RacerMike said:
Does look good. As always I have questions on their lap times. You can quite easily work out the scale on the G Meter by doing a simple distance over time measurement under braking since they provide a highly accurate timer to 3 decimal places and a speed display. As you might expect, the second chaplet is 1.0g (the guy never really attacks the brakes that hard, but he does sustain quite a nice constant brake event into the final chicane). This is easily derived from the fact he loses 27.78m/s in 2.542s. This is where the G Ball sits (just ever so slightly above the line where our calculated G is about 1.07g).



We can therefore reliably say that he's peaking at 1.5g in the corners and sustaining close to 1.4g. That's right up there at Cup2 R/Slick levels of grip and the bouncing and turn in you can see in the video is very reminiscent of a competition tyre.




Of course, it's all arbitrary really. It's just willy waving. But it does annoy me a little bit as 'optimising' a car is one thing, but bolting on a set of slicks (or 'pre production sample compound Bridgestones' as I'm sure they'd claim) is somewhat disingenuous.

If they do offer the car on Cup2 Rs or even better, if Brigestone have developed a competitive tyre in the ultra high performance track tyre category, then I will quite happily eat my spreadsheet.
Does 1g max under braking not show that the 1.4g is not real? Either sensor or gauge is fudged.
It also peaks occasionally at 1.4 under braking but he’s fairly gentle on them the whole lap lifting quite early before actually hitting the pedal. Almost as if he’s trying to protect the brakes from overheating due to using a lot of grip availability.

fantheman80

2,675 posts

79 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
yeah yeah whats 0.8 between friends, just hurry up Honda, take my money. Its been 4.5 glorious years with the Fk8 but I need them fat arches in my life

AmosMoses

4,064 posts

195 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
Seriously impressive, wonder if this will nudge the value of FK8s down? Really do fancy one.

nuttywobbler

349 posts

92 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
I suspect this is going to be the last purely ICE Type R.

Come on Honda; make sure it's a belter.

VTECMatt

1,373 posts

268 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
ChrisCh86 said:
Much better looking than it's predecessor (with all of those horrible fake vents). A shame it's not made in Japan!

Should be a cracking drive given that it's an evolution of the FK8
RHDs are being built in Japan I’m lead to believe.

TO73074E

502 posts

57 months

Thursday 7th April 2022
quotequote all
spikyone said:
ChrisCh86 said:
Much better looking than it's predecessor (with all of those horrible fake vents). A shame it's not made in Japan!

Should be a cracking drive given that it's an evolution of the FK8
I know I'm going against the grain, but I think it's far less interesting to look at than the FK8 and worse for it. Does anyone genuinely think the new one is actually nice looking, or is it just a dislike of the old one? It's nowhere near as bonkers looking as the previous gen but hardly praiseworthy in its own right. I'll take those divisive looks over blandness any day.

As for the vents, although a common criticism they were on the entire range of Civics, not just the Type R.
No i'm with you, I think the FK8 is far better looking than this version, although it is hard to fully tell with the camo paint job. I was never sure about the FK8 when I first saw pictures, then I saw one in the flesh and I love how it looks. It is different and thats what resonates with me. This is coming from a man who loves the look of the AH-64 Apache, A-10 Warthog and the Lancia Delta S4 so my view of beauty is very different from the next man.