RE: MG XPower SV-R | Spotted
RE: MG XPower SV-R | Spotted
Wednesday 28th September 2022

MG XPower SV-R | Spotted

It never lived up to its 1,000hp claim, but there's still plenty to love about MG's brutish supercar


It’s 2002. I’m standing on the banked spectator area near the Campbell/Cobb complex at Thurxton and I’m completely transfixed by the black and green MG ZTs lapping somewhere in the mid-pack. While not blisteringly fast - despite having touring car aces Anthony Reid and Warren Hughes at the wheel - I was hooked on MG’s fledgling XPower brand and couldn’t wait to see what this exciting British performance tearaway had up its sleeve.

Not a lot, it turned out. Clearly a brilliant marketing exercise (I’m sure I’m not the only one who scooped up all the tat back in the day), but XPower never turned out to be the British equivalent of AMG or M that nine-year-old me hoped it would. In all fairness, it did release some truly bonkers concepts along the way, such as 500hp variants of the TF and ZT, but the only offerings that made it into showrooms were warmed-up versions of MG’s hatch and saloons. Oh, and of course, the car we have here.

To say the SV was XPower’s first bespoke project to hit the road would be a bit of a stretch. The idea came about after MG Rover acquired boutique Italian carmaker Qvale, which had been developing its Mangusta roadster – itself originally branded a De Tomaso. Noticing that it would make a great base for a performance car, and that it was already homologated for use in the US, MG got to work building a concept – the X80. Apparently, the styling was deemed too understated (read: hideous) at the time, so McLaren F1 designer Peter Stevens was called upon to create the look we’ve all come to know and, for some, love.

There’s no denying it looks quite unlike anything that’s come before or since, seemingly combining tuner, exotic and muscle car elements into one package. And while it can look a little, erm, aftermarket, this isn’t some fibreglass phenomenon built in the back corner of the MG Rover factory. Nope, the SV’s bodywork was made up of carbon fibre in places, aluminium in others, though it was hardly a featherweight at 1.5 tonnes. Still, it ticked some of the boxes an exotic supercar should.

Things get a bit more complicated on the engine front. Initially, there was a plan to offer the SV as a 1,000hp package complete with nitrous kit (this was peak Fast and Furious era, after all), which ultimately proved to be a load of rubbish. Instead, the original SV was powered by a Ford-sourced 4.6-litre V8 developing 320hp, though the car we have here is the punchier SV-R. It came with a Roush-tuned 5.0-litre V8, upping the output to an official 385hp – though it allegedly produced closer to 410hp. Hard to see how 1,000hp could come from either of those engines, but it was still a massive jump over the rest of the MG Rover lineup.

As was the price, which started at around £83,000 (or £120,000 in today’s money). Sure, they had a reputation of being a bit of a beast, but it’s not hard to see why the order books were bursting, resulting in a production run of just 82 examples. This is one of just 42 SV-R variants, made even rarer by it being the only car to be finished in Grigio Titanium. It was sold in 2004 for £93,000, which must have been a hard sell in its day, but with a price tag of £61,995 today, the SV-R has a certain allure about it. Right? 


SPECIFICATION | MG XPOWER SV-R

Engine: 4,997cc V8
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 390@7,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 391@4,800-5,600rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 2004
Recorded mileage: 9,464
Price new: £93,000
Yours for: £61,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

oilit

Original Poster:

2,818 posts

208 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
At the time I was very keen to get one of these, but I didn’t (i was concerned about MGR going bust as a mate worked at BMW and claimed BMW could predict almost to the week when MGR would go bust the day they sold it to Towers and co (it turns out they were pretty accurate in their predictions))

Looking at it now, the exterior looks ok and has dated well, the interior looks a mess though - couldn't they find any horn buttons or airbags that fit the steering wheel? i guess the fact it has gone down in value from when new must be a first for the garage selling it !,

soad

34,721 posts

206 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Completely forgot about these, still looks a mess.

Just who’d buy one?!

Mysstree

547 posts

76 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
The colour, interior and those “gills” don’t do it any favours.

p4cks

7,525 posts

229 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Very interesting, in a circus freak show sort of way.

MikeM6

6,070 posts

132 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Never a good looking car, but that was more the fault of what it was based on I think. It is a very interesting one though, so it does appeal.

I would have loved to have known what MG would have done next if they had made a success of this!

cptsideways

13,889 posts

282 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Thankfully one of the better things that came out of the MG collapse, they didn't make any more of them.

blue al

1,444 posts

189 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
I like it from the outside, more so in darker colours, it has something about it, it’s a little bit naughty, tasty,
Ray Winstone personified in car form.
And the inside is just a fusion of TVR, and TT with some additional middle age spread, and not in a good way, seems like everything is padded by 20% more than is strictly necessary “ as it’s luxurious then”



Edited by blue al on Wednesday 28th September 07:08

lrdisco

1,743 posts

117 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
I think the previous posters are a bit harsh.
It’s certainly different and would turn more heads than a SL AMG of the same era.
I’ve always liked these even though I hate pretty much every MGR since the mid 80’s.

williskwl

375 posts

207 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Saw this one at a car show recently, sounded good and was in great condition!


Vee12V

1,411 posts

190 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Always had a bit of a soft spot for these, but the wing on this one is tragic.

Hairymonster

1,678 posts

135 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
IIRC these were being punted out at 35-40k towards the end - not sure if this was desperation on MG's part or whether it was liquidators selling assets to recover what money they could.

BigGingerBob

2,186 posts

220 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
I really want one of these. I think they look great on darker colours.

I remember seeing it at the NEC motor show in either 2002 or 3 and have been wanting one ever since.

I know I’m in the minority but whatever

pycraft

1,500 posts

214 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
I love the interior. It'd be like sitting in a bath of banana yoghurt.

marcom44

50 posts

134 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Wow I will keep my AMG C55 at a sixth of the price.

Pflanzgarten

7,697 posts

55 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Remember Rowan Atkinson having one as a long termer in Evo? Wasn't the most reliable thing.

I also remember them being around £35k, took a brave man even back then.

The spinner of plates

18,084 posts

230 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
soad said:
Completely forgot about these, still looks a mess.

Just who’d buy one?!
Seem to recall Rowan Atkinson did

satfinal

2,625 posts

192 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
I remember when Clarkson had it on Top Gear, they teased us saying they will get it on NOS for the crazy high horsepower figure

They never did follow up weeping

bangerhoarder

816 posts

98 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Seen a couple abandoned at local garages here. Seems that much of the drivetrain is easy enough to source parts for, but there are certain unobtainables for them to put a stopper on it.

The quality of the fit and finish is a bit kit-car, and again I’d guess you’d need some custom work done to get any small things fixed.

Dombilano

1,466 posts

85 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
I'd rather buy 62,000 Mars bar 3 multipacks

sidesauce

2,967 posts

248 months

Wednesday 28th September 2022
quotequote all
Hideously ugly.

Horrible when new. Even worse now.

vomit