RE: Rover 200 (R8) | Shed of the Week
RE: Rover 200 (R8) | Shed of the Week
Friday 30th September 2022

Rover 200 (R8) | Shed of the Week

The Mk2 was the first car launched by a newly privatised Rover - it showed


Not many people call their dogs Rover these days but it’s a fair bet that more than a few PHers will be calling this week’s Rover a dog. Would they be right to say that about this 214, though? Whatever your thoughts may be on British Leyland products, what you’re looking at here is a 43,000-mile one-owner hatchback with no massively alarming faults on the MOT history. Beyond that, you can bet your last parcel shelf scatter cushion that it will attract a lot of attention at any local car show, especially if you live in the Midlands.

This is the Mk2 ‘R8’ Rover 200. The first SD3 four-door saloon of 1984-89 was the second joint venture project between British Leyland and Honda, the first one being the Triumph Acclaim. Size wise it sat between the Maestro and Montego, but it was pitched into a posher niche than both of them. 

Our Mk2 was available from 1989 to 1997, though it was technically replaced by the more familiar R3 hatch in 1995. There was a four-door saloon version too, the 400, although the 200 was a five-door hatch and that was a big step up for the newly privatised Rover Group. It would be an overstatement to say that it transformed Rover’s image from bowler hat to baseball cap overnight, but it certainly moved it up to holiday trilby level.

It was a decent little car. More than decent, in fact. It made contemporary rivals like the Escort and Astra feel like yesterday’s chip paper and drove well enough for What Car? magazine to make the 200 its 1990 Car of the Year. The Coupe version was distinctly elegant and the engines were good. The 1.6-litre petrol was a Honda unit, the 1.8-litre and 1.9-litre diesels were XUDs from PSA, and the 1.4-litre 16-valve petrol was a debutant for Rover that you may have heard of: the K-Series. Thanks to the 5-door’s low weight (1,065kg) you were never humiliated by the performance from the 95hp-ish 1.4 motor, with 11sec 0-60 times and a chassis that was fluid enough to let you use all of the performance most of the time.

Given the low mileage of our shed you wonder whether the head gasket has been changed. Although we’re not told in the ad whether it comes with a wodge of paperwork, you’d like to think that the single owner would have said yes to everything when it came to servicing. If the gasket hasn’t been done, well, that might make it one of the last in the country, if not the world, to be running the original item, so there’s some paleontological interest there.   

The car has apparently been for sale for a little while as the vendor’s ad says that it has just passed its MOT even though that was back in May. That report brought the first mention of corrosion lightly affecting a front subframe and a rear suspension mounting point. That’s a shame but hardly surprising what with the age of the car and Britain’s taxing weather. The only advisory on the previous 2021 test was the brake pedal rubber wearing smooth. Of course, it always helps to be only doing 2,000 miles a year on average, the rest of the car’s time presumably spent in a garage dreaming of the open road. 

Rimmers still support cars like this and they reckon they have most items in stock, so keeping it going once the rust has been expunged shouldn’t be an issue. Parts won’t be dear, 14in tyres certainly aren’t, and you can expect mpg figures in the high 30s plus vehicle tax of £170. Probs best not to have an accident in one but with fewer than 70 of these 214s left on British roads this example has surely got to be worth saving even at £1,500. 

The Shed family has a dog by the way. They got it from the village blacksmith. When Shed got him home he made a bolt for the door. Here all week etc.


See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

Shortos

Original Poster:

13 posts

133 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
This may or may not be a good buy, but is so uninteresting I don’t care.

gonnagetyoursBenny

103 posts

131 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
About as desirable as sour lamb, and it needs its worth again in welding before its next MOT. How many scrappers have non-written off sub-50k miles Rovers on their lots I wonder?

There's actually a nicer one with more mileage for sale on PH for £1490. Nicer like street dogs are nicer than hyenas: one will laugh at you and empty your wallet on first contact whereas the other requires you to overlook every objective feature in order to say "but it is a family dog car".

Filibuster

3,387 posts

241 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
That ad laugh

Made me laugh on a rainy Friday morning. Regarding the car: not for me. I‘m all for some 90‘s nostalgia (that‘s why I bought an R129 earlier this year) but I don‘g care for those Rover. But for someone who does, this seems to be good car.

Of course you have to be prepared to spend some money on it.

Cambs_Stuart

3,502 posts

110 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
I think that looks like a usable classic. Assuming rust isn't too serious then it'll be cheap and easy to maintain. Even a head gasket replacementisn't that much.
Good spot.
But where's the innuendo? No mention of the post mistress? How is Mrs Shed?

soad

34,459 posts

202 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
Surprised there’s any left these days.

Quite easy to steal iirc.

anonymous-user

80 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
Kudos for the chiasmus right off the bat

Stoned

114 posts

155 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
What's with those photos, it's like they've all been filtered like some ladies do in their selfie shots laugh

0ddball

914 posts

165 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
Even when I started driving 25 years ago, this wasn't a desirable car. Now it's fallen into the category of 'i'd have to think twice if it were free'.

satfinal

2,625 posts

188 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
clean your finger grease off your fking camera lens

Edited by satfinal on Friday 30th September 07:15

Nsuro80

38 posts

91 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
Loving the Brussel sprouts on that kettle!

anonymous-user

80 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
L reg cars of any kind seem to be scarce - I’ve always wondered why.

Agent57

2,424 posts

180 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
In that spec - One for festival of the unexceptional, surely.

I had a 414SLi 16v and a 216 GTI 16v. Lovely cars. Much better than equivalent Escort or Belmont.

never_thought_id_buy

42 posts

210 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
As much as I liked, grew up with and owned BMC/ BL/ Rover products, this is one that I just would not want. As a 214i, I’m pretty sure that it only has the 74hp, 8 valve, single point injection engine. My then girlfriend had one as her first car - lovely and comfortable but slow just doesn’t describe it. It had none of the high rev eagerness that the K series is known for but had to be thrashed to get anywhere.

anonymous-user

80 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
I had one of these when I was 22. It was the facelift one though so smoked rear lights and clear indicators. Mine was the SLi, I thought the 1.4 multi point injection was 103bhp? It also had an electric sunroof as well. Being young, hip and cool, I had it lowered on PI springs, K&N induction kit, a GTI back box from Janspeed and Wolfrace Urban Racer 7 wheels. Oh and a "banging" sound system.... laugh Pioneer head unit with 12 cd changer and magnet component speakers and amp with an Aliante sub. Anyway, I digress. It wasn't a bad car by any means but you did have to replace parts quite often. Had mine for two years and had to replace the water pump, cat, alternator, battery and a few other things. It was seven years old but only had around 40k when I got it.

Jordie Barretts sock

6,018 posts

45 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
That is a real, usable, cheap shed. Exactly what the feature is about.

Great little car, much much better than anything Ford or GM put out at the time.

Just wishing it wasn't red.

Hub

7,069 posts

224 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
These were great cars at the time. Even the 1.4 k series was pretty sprightly as the article says (certainly compared to its contemporaries). Shame it is the base model, but otherwise a decent modern classic shed!

spikyone

1,879 posts

126 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
45k on the clock and an MOT advisory that the brake pedal rubber is wearing smooth? That doesn't add up. No interest in it anyway, it's a curio but not really much car for your money.

aston addict

464 posts

184 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
Rimmers. Says it all.

Alorotom

12,737 posts

213 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
“The coupe version was distinctly elegant”

Was it bks … well, maybe if you suffered from extreme cataracts.

These were dire at the time and no less so now.

fantheman80

2,481 posts

75 months

Friday 30th September 2022
quotequote all
Seller used a whole bottle of tyre spray, proper tyre walls back then...

if you squint you can still see a maestro under there